mirror of
https://github.com/servo/servo.git
synced 2025-08-03 04:30:10 +01:00
Increase the size of the style sharing cache to 31.
Still a lot of guesswork here, but this does seem to get us better sharing. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1369621 for some data.
This commit is contained in:
parent
93271e199b
commit
2f2b93c521
2 changed files with 12 additions and 16 deletions
|
@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ use context::TraversalStatistics;
|
|||
use dom::{OpaqueNode, SendNode, TElement, TNode};
|
||||
use rayon;
|
||||
use scoped_tls::ScopedTLS;
|
||||
use sharing::STYLE_SHARING_CANDIDATE_CACHE_SIZE;
|
||||
use smallvec::SmallVec;
|
||||
use std::borrow::Borrow;
|
||||
use std::mem;
|
||||
|
@ -36,21 +35,10 @@ use traversal::{DomTraversal, PerLevelTraversalData, PreTraverseToken};
|
|||
/// The maximum number of child nodes that we will process as a single unit.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Larger values will increase style sharing cache hits and general DOM locality
|
||||
/// at the expense of decreased opportunities for parallelism. The style sharing
|
||||
/// cache can hold 8 entries, but not all styles are shareable, so we set this
|
||||
/// value to 16. These values have not been measured and could potentially be
|
||||
/// tuned.
|
||||
/// at the expense of decreased opportunities for parallelism. This value has not
|
||||
/// been measured and could potentially be tuned.
|
||||
pub const WORK_UNIT_MAX: usize = 16;
|
||||
|
||||
/// Verify that the style sharing cache size doesn't change. If it does, we should
|
||||
/// reconsider the above. We do this, rather than defining WORK_UNIT_MAX in terms
|
||||
/// of STYLE_SHARING_CANDIDATE_CACHE_SIZE, so that altering the latter doesn't
|
||||
/// have surprising effects on the parallelism characteristics of the style system.
|
||||
#[allow(dead_code)]
|
||||
fn static_assert() {
|
||||
unsafe { mem::transmute::<_, [u32; STYLE_SHARING_CANDIDATE_CACHE_SIZE]>([1; 8]); }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// A list of node pointers.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Note that the inline storage doesn't need to be sized to WORK_UNIT_MAX, but
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue