Use usize and u32 for LayerId.

This commit is contained in:
Ms2ger 2015-03-27 17:55:20 +01:00
parent ac3c076892
commit 37c271a260
3 changed files with 6 additions and 9 deletions

View file

@ -1869,11 +1869,11 @@ impl Flow for BlockFlow {
self.fragment.border_box - self.fragment.style().logical_border_width()
}
fn layer_id(&self, fragment_index: uint) -> LayerId {
fn layer_id(&self, fragment_index: u32) -> LayerId {
// FIXME(#2010, pcwalton): This is a hack and is totally bogus in the presence of pseudo-
// elements. But until we have incremental reflow we can't do better--we recreate the flow
// for every DOM node so otherwise we nuke layers on every reflow.
LayerId(self.fragment.node.id() as uint, fragment_index)
LayerId(self.fragment.node.id() as usize, fragment_index)
}
fn is_absolute_containing_block(&self) -> bool {

View file

@ -311,12 +311,9 @@ pub trait Flow: fmt::Debug + Sync {
/// Returns a layer ID for the given fragment.
#[allow(unsafe_code)]
fn layer_id(&self, fragment_id: uint) -> LayerId {
unsafe {
let obj = mem::transmute::<&&Self, &raw::TraitObject>(&self);
let pointer: uint = mem::transmute(obj.data);
LayerId(pointer, fragment_id)
}
fn layer_id(&self, fragment_id: u32) -> LayerId {
let obj = unsafe { mem::transmute::<&&Self, &raw::TraitObject>(&self) };
LayerId(obj.data as usize, fragment_id)
}
/// Attempts to perform incremental fixup of this flow by replacing its fragment's style with

View file

@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ impl Epoch {
}
#[derive(Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Copy)]
pub struct LayerId(pub uint, pub uint);
pub struct LayerId(pub usize, pub u32);
impl Debug for LayerId {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut Formatter) -> fmt::Result {