mirror of
https://github.com/servo/servo.git
synced 2025-08-06 14:10:11 +01:00
Uplift bitfield fix for nsChangeHint
This commit is contained in:
parent
9fb589dfd2
commit
3d5b26ac26
5 changed files with 219 additions and 104 deletions
|
@ -23,24 +23,24 @@ macro_rules! check_enum_value {
|
|||
// const-fn and no other way to access the numerical value :-(
|
||||
macro_rules! check_enum_value_non_static {
|
||||
($a:expr, $b:expr) => {
|
||||
assert_eq!($a as usize, $b as usize);
|
||||
assert_eq!($a.0 as usize, $b as usize);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn assert_restyle_hints_match() {
|
||||
use style::restyle_hints::*; // For flags
|
||||
use style::gecko_bindings::structs::nsRestyleHint;
|
||||
use style::gecko_bindings::structs;
|
||||
|
||||
check_enum_value_non_static!(nsRestyleHint::eRestyle_Self, RESTYLE_SELF.bits());
|
||||
check_enum_value_non_static!(structs::nsRestyleHint_eRestyle_Self, RESTYLE_SELF.bits());
|
||||
// XXX This for Servo actually means something like an hypothetical
|
||||
// Restyle_AllDescendants (but without running selector matching on the
|
||||
// element). ServoRestyleManager interprets it like that, but in practice we
|
||||
// should align the behavior with Gecko adding a new restyle hint, maybe?
|
||||
//
|
||||
// See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1291786
|
||||
check_enum_value_non_static!(nsRestyleHint::eRestyle_SomeDescendants, RESTYLE_DESCENDANTS.bits());
|
||||
check_enum_value_non_static!(nsRestyleHint::eRestyle_LaterSiblings, RESTYLE_LATER_SIBLINGS.bits());
|
||||
check_enum_value_non_static!(structs::nsRestyleHint_eRestyle_SomeDescendants, RESTYLE_DESCENDANTS.bits());
|
||||
check_enum_value_non_static!(structs::nsRestyleHint_eRestyle_LaterSiblings, RESTYLE_LATER_SIBLINGS.bits());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Note that we can't call each_pseudo_element, parse_pseudo_element, or
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue