Auto merge of #18572 - hiikezoe:immportant-in-keyframe, r=emilio

Handle !important in keyframe

<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1400926

---
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18572)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
This commit is contained in:
bors-servo 2017-09-20 13:40:12 -05:00 committed by GitHub
commit 46ae11b5d0
4 changed files with 54 additions and 10 deletions

View file

@ -481,11 +481,13 @@ fn compute_style_for_animation_step(context: &SharedStyleContext,
KeyframesStepValue::Declarations { block: ref declarations } => {
let guard = declarations.read_with(context.guards.author);
// No !important in keyframes.
debug_assert!(!guard.any_important());
let iter = || {
guard.declarations().iter().rev()
// It's possible to have !important properties in keyframes
// so we have to filter them out.
// See the spec issue https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1824
// Also we filter our non-animatable properties.
guard.normal_declaration_iter()
.filter(|declaration| declaration.is_animatable())
.map(|decl| (decl, CascadeLevel::Animations))
};

View file

@ -112,6 +112,40 @@ impl<'a> DoubleEndedIterator for DeclarationImportanceIterator<'a> {
}
}
/// Iterator over `PropertyDeclaration` for Importance::Normal.
pub struct NormalDeclarationIterator<'a>(DeclarationImportanceIterator<'a>);
impl<'a> NormalDeclarationIterator<'a> {
/// Constructor
pub fn new(declarations: &'a [PropertyDeclaration], important: &'a SmallBitVec) -> Self {
NormalDeclarationIterator(
DeclarationImportanceIterator::new(declarations, important)
)
}
}
impl<'a> Iterator for NormalDeclarationIterator<'a> {
type Item = &'a PropertyDeclaration;
fn next(&mut self) -> Option<Self::Item> {
loop {
let next = self.0.iter.next();
match next {
Some((decl, importance)) => {
if !importance {
return Some(decl);
}
},
None => return None,
}
}
}
fn size_hint(&self) -> (usize, Option<usize>) {
self.0.iter.size_hint()
}
}
/// Iterator for AnimationValue to be generated from PropertyDeclarationBlock.
pub struct AnimationValueIterator<'a, 'cx, 'cx_a:'cx> {
iter: DeclarationImportanceIterator<'a>,
@ -208,6 +242,11 @@ impl PropertyDeclarationBlock {
DeclarationImportanceIterator::new(&self.declarations, &self.declarations_importance)
}
/// Iterate over `PropertyDeclaration` for Importance::Normal
pub fn normal_declaration_iter(&self) -> NormalDeclarationIterator {
NormalDeclarationIterator::new(&self.declarations, &self.declarations_importance)
}
/// Return an iterator of (AnimatableLonghand, AnimationValue).
pub fn to_animation_value_iter<'a, 'cx, 'cx_a:'cx>(&'a self,
context: &'cx mut Context<'cx_a>,

View file

@ -375,9 +375,13 @@ fn get_animated_properties(keyframes: &[Arc<Locked<Keyframe>>], guard: &SharedRw
for keyframe in keyframes {
let keyframe = keyframe.read_with(&guard);
let block = keyframe.block.read_with(guard);
for (declaration, importance) in block.declaration_importance_iter() {
assert!(!importance.important());
// CSS Animations spec clearly defines that properties with !important
// in keyframe rules are invalid and ignored, but it's still ambiguous
// whether we should drop the !important properties or retain the
// properties when they are set via CSSOM. So we assume there might
// be properties with !important in keyframe rules here.
// See the spec issue https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1824
for declaration in block.normal_declaration_iter() {
if let Some(property) = AnimatableLonghand::from_declaration(declaration) {
// Skip the 'display' property because although it is animatable from SMIL,
// it should not be animatable from CSS Animations or Web Animations.