style: Invalidate shadow part pseudo-class styles correctly.

I was going to send a test for `:focus` via wpt, but then realized it was
probably not spec-compliant with the new rules people want to follow for
:focus, so I filed https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4555 instead.

Testing `:hover` / `:active` via wpt looked quite a bit of a hassle.

Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D55591
This commit is contained in:
Emilio Cobos Álvarez 2019-12-09 13:40:16 +00:00
parent 6973317a58
commit 7cd59da2a0
3 changed files with 53 additions and 4 deletions

View file

@ -807,6 +807,9 @@ pub trait TElement:
/// data if it comes from Shadow DOM.
///
/// Returns whether normal document author rules should apply.
///
/// TODO(emilio): We could separate the invalidation data for elements
/// matching in other scopes to avoid over-invalidation.
fn each_applicable_non_document_style_rule_data<'a, F>(&self, mut f: F) -> bool
where
Self: 'a,
@ -841,11 +844,42 @@ pub trait TElement:
// Slots can only have assigned nodes when in a shadow tree.
let shadow = slot.containing_shadow().unwrap();
if let Some(data) = shadow.style_data() {
f(data, shadow.host());
if data.any_slotted_rule() {
f(data, shadow.host());
}
}
current = slot.assigned_slot();
}
if target.has_part_attr() {
if let Some(mut inner_shadow) = target.containing_shadow() {
loop {
let inner_shadow_host = inner_shadow.host();
match inner_shadow_host.containing_shadow() {
Some(shadow) => {
if let Some(data) = shadow.style_data() {
if data.any_part_rule() {
f(data, shadow.host())
}
}
// TODO: Could be more granular.
if !shadow.host().exports_any_part() {
break;
}
inner_shadow = shadow;
}
None => {
// TODO(emilio): Should probably distinguish with
// MatchesDocumentRules::{No,Yes,IfPart} or
// something so that we could skip some work.
doc_rules_apply = true;
break;
}
}
}
}
}
doc_rules_apply
}