Mirrors/servo
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/servo/servo.git synced 2025-07-22 23:03:42 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Bug 1349553: Account for negations of state-dependent selectors.

Browse source 
MozReview-Commit-ID: VyHuxh9q5N
Signed-off-by: Emilio Cobos Álvarez <emilio@crisal.io>
This commit is contained in:
Emilio Cobos Álvarez 2017-03-22 14:41:22 +01:00
parent 2b99c76052
commit ab2956a815
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 056B727BB9C1027C
2 changed files with 19 additions and 1 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

3
components/style/gecko/selector_parser.rs
View file

@ -154,6 +154,9 @@ macro_rules! pseudo_class_name {
$s_name(Box<[u16]>),
)*
/// The non-standard `:-moz-any` pseudo-class.
///
/// TODO(emilio): We disallow combinators and pseudos here, so we
/// should use SimpleSelector instead
MozAny(Vec<ComplexSelector<SelectorImpl>>),
}
}

17
components/style/restyle_hints.rs
View file

@ -358,7 +358,8 @@ impl<'a, E> Element for ElementWrapper<'a, E>
}
}
/// Returns the union of any `ElementState` flags for components of a `ComplexSelector`
/// Returns the union of any `ElementState` flags for components of a
/// `ComplexSelector`.
pub fn complex_selector_to_state(sel: &ComplexSelector<SelectorImpl>) -> ElementState {
sel.compound_selector.iter().fold(ElementState::empty(), |state, s| {
state | selector_to_state(s)
@ -368,6 +369,11 @@ pub fn complex_selector_to_state(sel: &ComplexSelector<SelectorImpl>) -> Element
fn selector_to_state(sel: &SimpleSelector<SelectorImpl>) -> ElementState {
match *sel {
SimpleSelector::NonTSPseudoClass(ref pc) => SelectorImpl::pseudo_class_state_flag(pc),
SimpleSelector::Negation(ref negated) => {
negated.iter().fold(ElementState::empty(), |state, s| {
state | complex_selector_to_state(s)
})
}
_ => ElementState::empty(),
}
}
@ -502,6 +508,15 @@ impl DependencySet {
if !sensitivities.attrs {
sensitivities.attrs = is_attr_selector(s);
}
// NOTE(emilio): I haven't thought this thoroughly, but we may
// not need to do anything for combinators inside negations.
//
// Or maybe we do, and need to call note_selector recursively
// here to account for them correctly, but keep the
// sensitivities of the parent?
//
// In any case, perhaps we should just drop it, see bug 1348802.
}
if !sensitivities.is_empty() {
self.add_dependency(Dependency {