Fix concept-headers-append

components/script/dom/headers.rs

@@ -64,57 +64,41 @@ impl Headers {
 impl HeadersMethods for Headers {
     // https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-headers-append
     fn Append(&self, name: ByteString, value: ByteString) -> ErrorResult {
-        // Step 1
         let value = normalize_value(value);
-        // Step 2
         let (mut valid_name, valid_value) = validate_name_and_value(name, value)?;
         valid_name = valid_name.to_lowercase();
-        // Step 3
+
         if self.guard.get() == Guard::Immutable {
             return Err(Error::Type("Guard is immutable".to_string()));
         }
-        // Step 4
         if self.guard.get() == Guard::Request && is_forbidden_header_name(&valid_name) {
             return Ok(());
         }
-        // Step 5
-        if self.guard.get() == Guard::RequestNoCors &&
-            !is_cors_safelisted_request_header(&valid_name, &valid_value)
-        {
-            return Ok(());
-        }
-        // Step 6
         if self.guard.get() == Guard::Response && is_forbidden_response_header(&valid_name) {
             return Ok(());
         }
-        // Step 7
+
-        // FIXME: this is NOT what WHATWG says to do when appending
+        if self.guard.get() == Guard::RequestNoCors {
-        // another copy of an existing header. HyperHeaders
+            let tmp_value = if let Some(value) = get_value_from_header_list(&valid_name, &self.header_list.borrow()) {
-        // might not expose the information we need to do it right.
+                let mut l = value.as_bytes().to_vec();
-        let mut combined_value: Vec<u8> = vec![];
+                l.extend(b", ");
-        if let Some(v) = self
+                l.extend(valid_value.clone());
-            .header_list
+                l
-            .borrow()
+            } else {
-            .get(HeaderName::from_str(&valid_name).unwrap())
+                valid_value.clone()
-        {
+            };
-            combined_value = v.as_bytes().to_vec();
+
-            combined_value.extend(b", ");
+            if !is_cors_safelisted_request_header(&valid_name, &tmp_value) {
+                return Ok(());
             }
-        combined_value.extend(valid_value.iter().cloned());
+        }
-        match HeaderValue::from_bytes(&combined_value) {
+
-            Ok(value) => {
+        if self.guard.get() != Guard::RequestNoCors || valid_name != "range" {
             self.header_list
                 .borrow_mut()
-                    .insert(HeaderName::from_str(&valid_name).unwrap(), value);
+                .append(HeaderName::from_str(&valid_name).unwrap(), HeaderValue::from_bytes(&valid_value).unwrap());
-            },
+        }
-            Err(_) => {
+
-                // can't add the header, but we don't need to panic the browser over it
-                warn!(
-                    "Servo thinks \"{:?}\" is a valid HTTP header value but HeaderValue doesn't.",
-                    combined_value
-                );
-            },
-        };
         Ok(())
     }
 

tests/wpt/metadata/fetch/api/headers/header-setcookie.any.js.ini

@@ -11,31 +11,13 @@
   [Headers iterator preserves set-cookie ordering]
     expected: FAIL
 
-  [Headers iterator preserves per header ordering, but sorts keys alphabetically]
-    expected: FAIL
-
   [Headers iterator preserves per header ordering, but sorts keys alphabetically (and ignores value ordering)]
     expected: FAIL
 
-  [Headers iterator is correctly updated with set-cookie changes]
-    expected: FAIL
-
   [Headers.prototype.append works for set-cookie]
     expected: FAIL
 
-  [Headers.prototype.getSetCookie with multiple headers]
+  [Headers.prototype.get combines set-cookie headers in order]
-    expected: FAIL
-
-  [Headers.prototype.getSetCookie with two equal headers]
-    expected: FAIL
-
-  [Headers.prototype.getSetCookie preserves header ordering]
-    expected: FAIL
-
-  [Headers iterator is correctly updated with set-cookie changes #2]
-    expected: FAIL
-
-  [Adding Set-Cookie headers normalizes their value]
     expected: FAIL
 
 
@@ -49,31 +31,13 @@
   [Headers iterator preserves set-cookie ordering]
     expected: FAIL
 
-  [Headers iterator preserves per header ordering, but sorts keys alphabetically]
-    expected: FAIL
-
   [Headers iterator preserves per header ordering, but sorts keys alphabetically (and ignores value ordering)]
     expected: FAIL
 
-  [Headers iterator is correctly updated with set-cookie changes]
-    expected: FAIL
-
   [Headers.prototype.append works for set-cookie]
     expected: FAIL
 
-  [Headers.prototype.getSetCookie with multiple headers]
+  [Headers.prototype.get combines set-cookie headers in order]
-    expected: FAIL
-
-  [Headers.prototype.getSetCookie with two equal headers]
-    expected: FAIL
-
-  [Headers.prototype.getSetCookie preserves header ordering]
-    expected: FAIL
-
-  [Headers iterator is correctly updated with set-cookie changes #2]
-    expected: FAIL
-
-  [Adding Set-Cookie headers normalizes their value]
     expected: FAIL