mirror of
https://github.com/servo/servo.git
synced 2025-08-06 06:00:15 +01:00
Move away from the repeat().take().collect() pattern.
This was the preferred pattern between the deprecation of Vec::from_elem and the addition of the count argument to the vec![] macro.
This commit is contained in:
parent
6a728712f9
commit
ce4d442941
6 changed files with 7 additions and 16 deletions
|
@ -25,7 +25,6 @@ use euclid::{Point2D, Rect};
|
|||
use gfx::display_list::DisplayList;
|
||||
use std::cmp;
|
||||
use std::fmt;
|
||||
use std::iter;
|
||||
use std::sync::Arc;
|
||||
use style::computed_values::{border_collapse, border_spacing, table_layout};
|
||||
use style::properties::ComputedValues;
|
||||
|
@ -718,8 +717,7 @@ fn perform_border_collapse_for_row(child_table_row: &mut TableRowFlow,
|
|||
}
|
||||
PreviousBlockCollapsedBorders::FromTable(collapsed_border) => {
|
||||
child_table_row.final_collapsed_borders.block_start =
|
||||
iter::repeat(collapsed_border).take(child_table_row.block_flow.base.children.len())
|
||||
.collect()
|
||||
vec![collapsed_border; child_table_row.block_flow.base.children.len()]
|
||||
}
|
||||
PreviousBlockCollapsedBorders::NotCollapsingBorders => {}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue