Mirrors/servo
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/servo/servo.git synced 2025-08-06 14:10:11 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Auto merge of #14167 - emilio:rule-tree-list, r=Manishearth

Browse source 
style: Don't assume siblings are alive in the rule tree when removing ourselves from the child list.

<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->

---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors

<!-- Either: -->
- [x] There are tests for these changes OR

<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->

We can't assume all our siblings are alive because they may very well be in the
free list too.

This tempts to happen when the rule nodes are destroyed as part of the last GC,
the one that runs in the root destructor.

Also, properly put the next sibling back into the list when the rules are GCd.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14167)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
This commit is contained in:
bors-servo 2016-11-11 13:33:06 -06:00 • committed by GitHub
commit d49840eeec
1 changed files with 15 additions and 10 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

25
components/style/rule_tree/mod.rs
View file

@ -200,21 +200,26 @@ impl RuleNode {
unsafe fn remove_from_child_list(&self) {
debug!("Remove from child list: {:?}, parent: {:?}",
self as *const RuleNode, self.parent.as_ref().map(|p| p.ptr()));
let prev_sibling = self.prev_sibling.swap(ptr::null_mut(), Ordering::SeqCst);
let next_sibling = self.next_sibling.swap(ptr::null_mut(), Ordering::SeqCst);
// NB: The other siblings we use in this function can also be dead, so
// we can't use `get` here, since it asserts.
let prev_sibling = self.prev_sibling.swap(ptr::null_mut(), Ordering::Relaxed);
let next_sibling = self.next_sibling.swap(ptr::null_mut(), Ordering::Relaxed);
if prev_sibling != ptr::null_mut() {
let really_previous = WeakRuleNode { ptr: prev_sibling };
really_previous.upgrade()
.get().next_sibling.store(next_sibling, Ordering::SeqCst);
// Store the `next` pointer as appropriate, either in the previous
// sibling, or in the parent otherwise.
if prev_sibling == ptr::null_mut() {
let parent = self.parent.as_ref().unwrap();
parent.get().first_child.store(next_sibling, Ordering::Relaxed);
} else {
self.parent.as_ref().unwrap()
.get().first_child.store(ptr::null_mut(), Ordering::SeqCst);
let previous = &*prev_sibling;
previous.next_sibling.store(next_sibling, Ordering::Relaxed);
}
// Store the previous sibling pointer in the next sibling if present,
// otherwise we're done.
if next_sibling != ptr::null_mut() {
let really_next = WeakRuleNode { ptr: next_sibling };
really_next.upgrade().get().prev_sibling.store(prev_sibling, Ordering::SeqCst);
let next = &*next_sibling;
next.prev_sibling.store(prev_sibling, Ordering::Relaxed);
}
}