Mirrors/servo
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/servo/servo.git synced 2025-08-03 20:50:07 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Update CSS tests to revision 2baa72daab8bf37e3e910a9fd311a1eaa5b0f4a8

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
James Graham 2015-07-27 17:47:31 +01:00
parent 662c00a810
commit df03062d62
10934 changed files with 428309 additions and 254265 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

1
tests/wpt/css-tests/css-transforms-1_dev/testinfo.data
View file

@ -970,6 +970,7 @@ transform3d-backface-visibility-004 reference/transform-lime-square-ref Backface
transform3d-backface-visibility-005 reference/transform-lime-square-ref Backface-Visibility With Transformed Parent in Different Rendering Context http://www.w3.org/TR/css-transforms-1/#propdef-backface-visibility 9e07ff34af1db7a890b79dcb298e64eb1627252c `Aryeh Gregor`<mailto:ayg@aryeh.name> This tests that if an element is not transformed, but its parent is rotated 180deg in a different rendering context, the child's 'backface-visibility: hidden' does not make it disappear. Only transforms that affect the child itself are relevant to 'backface-visibility'.
transform3d-backface-visibility-006 reference/transform-lime-square-ref Backface-Visibility With Transformed Parent in Same Rendering Context http://www.w3.org/TR/css-transforms-1/#propdef-backface-visibility ed5bf56a29c8a140962b5dc474805afe1e8d7fae `Aryeh Gregor`<mailto:ayg@aryeh.name> This is the same as transform3d-backface-visibility-005.html, except that the parent has 'transform-style: preserve-3d'. Thus the child is affected by the parent's transform and should not be visible.
transform3d-backface-visibility-007 reference/transform-lime-square-ref Simple Backface-Visibility, scalez(-1) http://www.w3.org/TR/css-transforms-1/#propdef-backface-visibility 5ea0eb31d5c2035a94a78230fdc04dff1ed55f1e `Aryeh Gregor`<mailto:ayg@aryeh.name> This is the same as transform3d-backface-visibility-001.html, except it uses scalez(-1) instead of rotatex(180deg). scalez(-1) has no visible effect when applied by itself to a box, since the box's Z-coordinates are all 0, but it still causes it to be affected by 'backface-visibility'.
transform3d-backface-visibility-008 reference/ref-filled-green-100px-square backface-visibility - visible http://www.w3.org/TR/css-transforms-1/#backface-visibility-property 61294acdc554248884a73193ade9a5a0f5e9d5f8 `Intel`<http://www.intel.com> When 'backface-visiblity' is set to visible, the back side of a transformed element is visible.
transform3d-image-scale-001 reference/transform-lime-square-ref scale3d() on a Bitmap http://www.w3.org/TR/css-transforms-1/#three-d-transform-functions,http://www.w3.org/TR/css-transforms-1/#funcdef-scale3d 11390f114b2c6d58dfd83f7771d1c3bf0708cf8c `Aryeh Gregor`<mailto:ayg@aryeh.name> This tests that applying a simple 3D transform to a bitmap image works properly. This is motivated by a real-world implementation bug: <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735373>.
transform3d-image-scale-002 reference/transform-lime-square-ref scale3d() on an SVG http://www.w3.org/TR/css-transforms-1/#three-d-transform-functions,http://www.w3.org/TR/css-transforms-1/#funcdef-scale3d 48c89f9c3a1cdc597aa6e3f5d40b88332b557493 `Aryeh Gregor`<mailto:ayg@aryeh.name> This is the same as transform3d-image-scale-001.html, but using an SVG image instead of a bitmap.
transform3d-matrix3d-001 reference/transform3d-matrix3d-001-ref,!reference/transform-lime-square-ref matrix3d(1,2,0,0, 3,4,0,0, 0,0,1,0, 5,6,0,1) http://www.w3.org/TR/css-transforms-1/#three-d-transform-functions,http://www.w3.org/TR/css-transforms-1/#funcdef-matrix3d 6183883abb7f7967bd346f58f590acc2f27e2f59 `Matt Woodrow`<mailto:mwoodrow@mozilla.com>,`Aryeh Gregor`<mailto:ayg@aryeh.name> This is part of a series that tests that various matrix3d()s are equivalent to other transform functions.