Mirrors/servo
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/servo/servo.git synced 2025-08-05 13:40:08 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Avoid crash in replaced layout, and fix behavior for non-auto aspect-ratio (#34006)

Browse source 
Also, it was assuming that the aspect ratio would work with the content
box dimensions, but that isn't the case for `aspect-ratio: <ratio>` with
`box-sizing: border-box`.

Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This commit is contained in:
Oriol Brufau 2024-10-25 19:13:07 +02:00 • committed by GitHub
parent 43c8441f6c
commit dfe1c95aa6
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
4 changed files with 140 additions and 8 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

16
components/layout_2020/replaced.rs
View file

@ -614,13 +614,13 @@ impl ReplacedContent {
},
// Rows 6-7.
(Violation::Above(max_inline_size), Violation::Above(max_block_size)) => {
if max_inline_size.0 * block_size.0 <= max_block_size.0 * inline_size.0 {
let transferred_block_size =
ratio.compute_dependent_size(Direction::Block, max_inline_size);
if transferred_block_size <= max_block_size {
// Row 6.
LogicalVec2 {
inline: max_inline_size,
block: ratio
.compute_dependent_size(Direction::Block, max_inline_size)
.max(min_box_size.block),
block: transferred_block_size.max(min_box_size.block),
}
} else {
// Row 7.
@ -634,12 +634,12 @@ impl ReplacedContent {
},
// Rows 8-9.
(Violation::Below(min_inline_size), Violation::Below(min_block_size)) => {
if min_inline_size.0 * block_size.0 <= min_block_size.0 * inline_size.0 {
let transferred_inline_size =
ratio.compute_dependent_size(Direction::Inline, min_block_size);
if min_inline_size <= transferred_inline_size {
// Row 8.
LogicalVec2 {
inline: ratio
.compute_dependent_size(Direction::Inline, min_block_size)
.clamp_below_max(max_box_size.inline),
inline: transferred_inline_size.clamp_below_max(max_box_size.inline),
block: min_block_size,
}
} else {

18
tests/wpt/meta/MANIFEST.json vendored
View file

@ -553,6 +553,17 @@
]
]
}
},
"visudet": {
"crashtests": {
"canvas-huge-min-max-sizes.html": [
"63413085347c0d85a9e8c0b5f2b7c13467dba962",
[
null,
{}
]
]
}
}
},
"compositing": {
@ -569016,6 +569027,13 @@
{}
]
],
"replaced-element-042.html": [
"2a301c3e1930d3351435ad17938b19c67ad85e8d",
[
null,
{}
]
],
"sign-function-aspect-ratio.html": [
"e5ba1a8321a42918cccee4ee164527fa25078e4f",
[

21
tests/wpt/tests/css/CSS2/visudet/crashtests/canvas-huge-min-max-sizes.html vendored Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
<!DOCTYPE html>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title>Don't crash with canvas with big min or max sizes</title>
<link rel="help" href="https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/visudet.html#min-max-widths">
<link rel="help" href="https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/33961">
<link rel="author" title="Oriol Brufau" href="mailto:obrufau@igalia.com">
<!--
According to https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/visudet.html#min-max-widths,
we need to check whether max-width/w ≤ max-height/h holds.
Or equivalently we can check whether max-width*h ≤ max-height*w holds,
but 100000 * 100001 = 10000200001 doesn't fit in a 32-bit integer.
-->
<canvas height="100001" width="100001" style="max-width: 100000px; max-height: 100000px;"></canvas>
<!--
Similarly, here we need to check whether min-width/w ≤ min-height/h holds.
Or equivalently we can check whether min-width*h ≤ min-height*w holds,
but again 100001 * 100000 = 10000200001 doesn't fit in a 32-bit integer.
-->
<canvas height="100000" width="100000" style="min-width: 100001px; min-height: 100001px;"></canvas>

93
tests/wpt/tests/css/css-sizing/aspect-ratio/replaced-element-042.html vendored Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
<!DOCTYPE html>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title>CSS aspect-ratio: replaced element with box-sizing</title>
<link rel="help" href="https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-4/#aspect-ratio">
<link rel="help" href="https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/visudet.html#min-max-widths">
<link rel="author" title="Oriol Brufau" href="mailto:obrufau@igalia.com">
<style>
canvas {
box-sizing: border-box;
aspect-ratio: 1;
width: auto;
height: auto;
background: black;
}
</style>
<div id="log"></div>
<!--
From https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/visudet.html#min-max-widths
> for replaced elements with an intrinsic ratio and both `width` and `height` specified as `auto`,
> the algorithm is as follows:
>
> Select from the table the resolved height and width values for the appropriate constraint violation.
> Take the max-width and max-height as max(min, max) so that min ≤ max holds true.
> In this table w and h stand for the results of the width and height computations
> ignoring the `min-width`, `min-height`, `max-width` and `max-height` properties.
> Normally these are the intrinsic width and height, but they may not be
> in the case of replaced elements with intrinsic ratios.
Note the testcases below ensure that w/h is 1 to match the provided `aspect-ratio`,
which didn't exist in CSS2.
Also note that `aspect-ratio: 1` refers to the border-box due to `box-sizing`,
so we need to perform all calculations using border-box sizes.
-->
<!--
w = 100 + 0 = 100
h = 50 + 50 = 100
max-width = 50
max-height = 70
Constraint Violation = "(w > max-width) and (h > max-height), where (max-width/w ≤ max-height/h)"
Resolved Width = max-width = 50
Resolved Height = max(min-height, max-width * h/w) = max(0, 50*100/100) = 50
-->
<canvas width="100" height="50" style="max-width: 50px; max-height: 70px; padding-top: 50px"
data-expected-width="50" data-expected-height="50"></canvas>
<!--
w = 50 + 50 = 100
h = 100 + 0 = 100
max-width = 70
max-height = 50
Constraint Violation = "(w > max-width) and (h > max-height), where (max-width/w > max-height/h)"
Resolved Width = max(min-width, max-height * w/h) = max(0, 50*100/100) = 50
Resolved Height = max-height = 50
-->
<canvas width="50" height="100" style="max-width: 70px; max-height: 50px; padding-left: 50px"
data-expected-width="50" data-expected-height="50"></canvas>
<!--
w = 50 + 50 = 100
h = 100 + 0 = 100
min-width = 150
min-height = 175
Constraint Violation = "(w < min-width) and (h < min-height), where (min-width/w ≤ min-height/h)"
Resolved Width = min(max-width, min-height * w/h) = min(∞, 175*100/100) = 175
Resolved Height = min-height = 175
-->
<canvas width="50" height="100" style="min-width: 150px; min-height: 175px; padding-left: 50px"
data-expected-width="175" data-expected-height="175"></canvas>
<!--
w = 100 + 0 = 100
h = 50 + 50 = 100
min-width = 175
min-height = 150
Constraint Violation = "(w < min-width) and (h < min-height), where (min-width/w > min-height/h)"
Resolved Width = min-width = 175
Resolved Height = min(max-height, min-width * h/w) = min(∞, 175*100/100) = 175
-->
<canvas width="100" height="50" style="min-width: 175px; min-height: 150px; padding-top: 50px"
data-expected-width="175" data-expected-height="175"></canvas>
<script src="/resources/testharness.js"></script>
<script src="/resources/testharnessreport.js"></script>
<script src="/resources/check-layout-th.js"></script>
<script>
checkLayout("canvas");
</script>