From ecdb10ef5c07aa41797d5c30fc42e1d942825504 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Emilio=20Cobos=20=C3=81lvarez?= <emilio@crisal.io>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 17:35:14 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Be more precise in should_process_descendants.

---
 components/style/invalidation/element/collector.rs | 7 ++-----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/components/style/invalidation/element/collector.rs b/components/style/invalidation/element/collector.rs
index 271e16f323c..08456e032e7 100644
--- a/components/style/invalidation/element/collector.rs
+++ b/components/style/invalidation/element/collector.rs
@@ -186,11 +186,8 @@ where
             Some(ref data) => data,
         };
 
-        // FIXME(emilio): should check only RESTYLE_DESCENDANTS.
-        //
-        // Also, could probably return false if data.styles.is_display_none()
-        // returns true.
-        !data.hint.contains_subtree()
+        !data.styles.is_display_none() &&
+            !data.hint.contains(RESTYLE_DESCENDANTS)
     }
 
     fn recursion_limit_exceeded(