Automated downstream sync of changes from upstream as of 21-09-2025
[no-wpt-sync]
---------
Signed-off-by: WPT Sync Bot <ghbot+wpt-sync@servo.org>
Signed-off-by: Euclid Ye <yezhizhenjiakang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Euclid Ye <yezhizhenjiakang@gmail.com>
The `overflow-*` values of either the root element or the `<body>` get
propagated to the viewport. However, we were missing this part:
> The element from which the value is propagated must then have a used
`overflow` value of `visible`.
See https://drafts.csswg.org/css-overflow/#overflow-propagation
Testing:
- `css/cssom-view/scrolling-quirks-vs-nonquirks.html`
- `css/css-overflow/overflow-body-propagation-007.html`
- `css/css-overflow/overflow-body-propagation-008.html`
- `css/css-overflow/overflow-body-propagation-009.html`
- `css/css-overflow/scrollable-overflow-with-nested-elements-001.html`
- `css/css-overflow/scrollable-overflow-with-nested-elements-002.html`
- `css/css-overflow/scrollable-overflow-with-nested-elements-003.html`
- `css/css-overflow/scrollable-overflow-with-nested-elements-004.html`
- `css/css-overflow/scrollbar-gutter-scroll-into-view.html`
Failures:
- `css/css-overflow/overflow-body-propagation-010.html`
Failing because of missing support for `contain: paint`.
- `css/css-overflow/scrollable-overflow-with-nested-elements-005.html`
Failing because of wrong `data-expected-height`, but correct
`data-expected-scroll-height` which is core of this PR.
`data-expected-height` can be dealt separately.
Fixes: #38248
---------
Signed-off-by: Shubham Gupta <shubham13297@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
The metadata provided by usvg has unreliable sizes. Ignore it, and rely
on the `width`, `height` and `viewBox` attributes instead.
Note that inline SVG with a natural aspect ratio but no natural sizes
should stretch to the containing block. This is left for a follow-up.
Bumps Stylo to https://github.com/servo/stylo/pull/229
Testing: Improves several WPT.
---------
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mukilan Thiyagarajan <mukilan@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Mukilan Thiyagarajan <mukilan@igalia.com>
This patch adds support for rendering static inline SVG documents in the
DOM tree by serializing the SVGElement's subtree and leveraging the
existing resvg based SVG stack for rendering. Serialiing the subtree is
necessary as resvg's tree representation (roxmltree) is immutable, so we
can't construct the tree incrementally.
Few other design choices here:
1. The `SVGSVGElement` is now treated as a replaced element and the
layout code is responsible for plumbing the serialized SVG source
(encoded as a base64 data: url) into the image cache, much like how
background images are handled.
2. The serialization is done on the script thread after an initial
layout pass. This is necessary because the serialization code asserts
that it is invoked from script thread i.e we can't call it from layout
workers.
3. The serialized SVG data: url is cached to avoid recomputing it on
subsequent layouts. The cache is invalidated when the SVGSVGElement's
subtree is mutated.
The original SVGSVGElement code was behind the `dom_svg_enabled` pref.
This patch also removes the preference and make SVG support using resvg
available unconditionally.
Below is the analysis of the new test failures:
These tests use inline SVG but used to pass by accident.
They now fail because they contain SVG with no intrinsic
sizing which is not handled by resvg in a way that would
allows us to distinguish it from the sized case. The same
limitation applies to non-inline SVG.
- /css/CSS2/positioning/absolute-replaced-width-003a.xht
- /css/CSS2/positioning/absolute-replaced-width-003b.xht
- /css/CSS2/positioning/absolute-replaced-width-003c.xht
These tests employ CSS styles in the HTML that
target the elements in inline SVG, which is not currently
supported.
-
/css/compositing/mix-blend-mode/mix-blend-mode-plus-lighter-svg-basic.html
- /css/compositing/mix-blend-mode/mix-blend-mode-plus-lighter-svg.html
This is a tentative test that uses the unsupported 'border-shape' CSS
property. The ref uses SVG, so it used to pass accidentally. The ref
still doesn't render correctly since it also relies on styling SVG
elements using CSS classes in the HTML (instead of inline in SVG).
- /css/css-borders/tentative/border-shape/border-shape-stroke.html
These tests use the attribute 'clip-path=circle(...)' in the
test, but this doesn't seem to work in resvg.
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-borderBox-1b.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-contentBox-1b.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-contentBox-1c.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-fillBox-1b.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-marginBox-1a.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-paddingBox-1b.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-strokeBox-1b.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-strokeBox-1c.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-viewBox-1a.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-viewBox-1b.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-viewBox-1d.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/svg-clip-path-circle-offset.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/svg-clip-path-ellipse-offset.html
Additionally, the below two tests use a `foreignObject` SVG element
which
embeds a html div fragment. This is also not supported by resvg.
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-viewBox-1d.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-fillBox-1b.html
The following test fails because of apparent pixel differences
between a circle rendered purely using CSS clip-path vs a circle
rendered in SVG using resvg.
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-contentBox-1c.html
These tests style the inline SVG elements using CSS in the HTML or
separate stylesheet. This is not supported by this implementation.
- /css-transforms/document-styles/svg-document-styles-{001..004}.html
- /css-transforms/document-styles/svg-document-styles-012.html
- /css-transforms/external-styles/svg-external-styles-{001..004}.html
- /css-transforms/external-styles/svg-external-styles-014.html
These tests seem like they should pass, but they fail because of what
seems like an anti-aliasing issue in the rendering engine. The
transformed element has a thin outline which is causing pixel difference
with the ref:
- /css/css-transforms/group/svg-transform-group-008.html
- /css/css-transforms/group/svg-transform-group-009.html
- /css/css-transforms/group/svg-transform-nested-009.html
- /css/css-transforms/group/svg-transform-nested-013.html
- /css/css-transforms/group/svg-transform-nested-014.html
- /css/css-transforms/group/svg-transform-nested-018.html
- /css/css-transforms/group/svg-transform-nested-019.html
- /css/css-transforms/group/svg-transform-nested-008.html
The below tests fail because resvg is calculating the wrong size for the
'rect' inside the SVG. The dimensions of the SVG are established via the
CSS in the HTML, so it seems resvg is using incorrect coordinates for
the children of the svg when explict width/height are not specified in
the root svg element.
- /css/css-transforms/group/svg-transform-group-011.html
- /css/css-transforms/group/svg-transform-nested-021.html
- /css/css-transforms/group/svg-transform-nested-029.html
All these tests use an SVG that doesn't have width nor height attributes
and this causes resvg to use incorrect coordinates for the SVG's
children. In addition, the following tests use the CSS syntax for
transforms inside the SVG (using style attribute) which is not supported
by resvg (it only supports the SVG 1.1 transform syntax).
- /css/css-transforms/inline-styles/svg-inline-styles-{001..004}.html
- /css/css-transforms/inline-styles/svg-inline-styles-012.html
In the case of these four tests, the `style` attribute specifies an
invalid transform, but resvg doesn't fallback to the transform specified
via the `transform` attribute on the same element.
- /css/css-transforms/inline-styles/svg-inline-styles-005.html
- /css/css-transforms/inline-styles/svg-inline-styles-006.html
- /css/css-transforms/inline-styles/svg-inline-styles-010.html
- /css/css-transforms/inline-styles/svg-inline-styles-013.html
The following test fails because of the lack of width/height in SVG as
described above but it also exposes gaps in our CSS tranform
implementation.
- /css/css-transforms/preserve3d-and-filter-with-perspective.html
These tests failure because resvg doesn't handle the SVG without
explicit width and height, but specified via CSS in the HTML. In
addition, there are pixel differences between the ref due to
antialiasing issues.
- /css/css-transforms/matrix/svg-matrix-{005...008}.html
- /css/css-transforms/matrix/svg-matrix-010.html
- /css/css-transforms/matrix/svg-matrix-012.html
- /css/css-transforms/matrix/svg-matrix-{015..069}.html
- /css/css-transforms/rotate/svg-rotate-angle-45-001.html
- /css/css-transforms/rotate/svg-rotate-angle-45-011.html
- /css/css-transforms/rotate/svg-rotate-angle-45-022.html
- /css/css-transforms/scale/svg-scale-006.html
- /css/css-transforms/scale/svg-scale-007.html
These tests seem to be failing due to some sort of antialiasing issue,
where a transformed SVG element has a thin border that causes pixel
differences compared to the solid colored reference.
- /css/css-transforms/skewX/svg-skewx-001.html
- /css/css-transforms/skewX/svg-skewx-006.html
- /css/css-transforms/skewX/svg-skewx-011.html
- /css/css-transforms/skewX/svg-skewx-016.html
- /css/css-transforms/skewX/svg-skewx-021.html
- /css/css-transforms/skewX/svg-skewxy-001.html
- /css/css-transforms/skewY/svg-skewy-001.html
- /css/css-transforms/skewY/svg-skewy-006.html
- /css/css-transforms/skewY/svg-skewy-011.html
- /css/css-transforms/skewY/svg-skewy-016.html
- /css/css-transforms/skewY/svg-skewy-021.html
These tests specify several SVG attributes such as transform,
vector-effect etc via CSS in the HTML (rather than inline in SVG). The
current implementation doesn't support this.
- /css/css-transforms/transform-box/stroke-box-mutation-001.html
- /css/css-transforms/transform-box/stroke-box-mutation-002.html
- /css/css-transforms/transform-box/stroke-box-mutation-003.html
- /css/css-transforms/transform-box/stroke-box-mutation-004.html
- /css/css-transforms/transform-box/svgbox-stroke-box-002.html
- /css/css-transforms/transform-box/svgbox-stroke-box-003.html
- /css/css-transforms/transform-box/svgbox-stroke-box-004.html
- /css/css-transforms/transform-box/svgbox-stroke-box-005.html
These tests depend on 'transform-origin' specified on an element inside
an SVG, but this transform is influenced by the 'tranform-box' set via
CSS in the HTML itself (not the SVG). The current implementation doesn't
support styling the SVG using document styles, so these tests just fail.
- /css/css-transforms/transform-origin/svg-origin-relative-length-*.html
These tests check the fallback behaviour when invalid syntax is
encountered in the 'transform-origin' value. resvg doesn't correctly
fallback to 0,0 causing the tests to fail.
-
/css/css-transforms/transform-origin/svg-origin-relative-length-invalid-001.html
-
/css/css-transforms/transform-origin/svg-origin-relative-length-invalid-002.html
-
/css/css-transforms/transform-origin/svg-origin-relative-length-invalid-003.html
-
/css/css-transforms/transform-origin/svg-origin-relative-length-invalid-004.html
These tests use unimplemented Canvas APIs like 'beginLayer' and
the 'CanvasFilter' constructor and hence fail at runtime.
-
/html/canvas/element/filters/2d.filter.canvasFilterObject.gaussianBlur.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/element/filters/2d.filter.layers.gaussianBlur.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/element/layers/2d.layer.anisotropic-blur.isotropic.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/element/layers/2d.layer.anisotropic-blur.mostly-x.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/element/layers/2d.layer.anisotropic-blur.mostly-y.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/element/layers/2d.layer.anisotropic-blur.x-only.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/element/layers/2d.layer.anisotropic-blur.y-only.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/element/layers/2d.layer.css-filters.blur-and-shadow.tentative.html
- /html/canvas/element/layers/2d.layer.css-filters.blur.tentative.html
- /html/canvas/element/layers/2d.layer.css-filters.shadow.tentative.html
- /html/canvas/element/layers/2d.layer.ctm.layer-filter.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/offscreen/filters/2d.filter.canvasFilterObject.dropShadow.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/offscreen/filters/2d.filter.canvasFilterObject.gaussianBlur.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/offscreen/filters/2d.filter.layers.dropShadow.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/offscreen/filters/2d.filter.layers.gaussianBlur.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/offscreen/layers/2d.layer.anisotropic-blur.isotropic.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/offscreen/layers/2d.layer.anisotropic-blur.mostly-x.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/offscreen/layers/2d.layer.anisotropic-blur.mostly-y.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/offscreen/layers/2d.layer.anisotropic-blur.x-only.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/offscreen/layers/2d.layer.anisotropic-blur.y-only.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/offscreen/layers/2d.layer.css-filters.blur-and-shadow.tentative.html
- /html/canvas/offscreen/layers/2d.layer.css-filters.blur.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/offscreen/layers/2d.layer.css-filters.shadow.tentative.html
- /html/canvas/offscreen/layers/2d.layer.ctm.layer-filter.tentative.html
These tests fail because resvg doesn't seem to honour the 'translate'
CSS property specified on an SVG element using an inline 'style'
attribute.
- /css/css-transforms/translate/svg-translate-with-units.html
-
/css/css-transforms/translate/translate-and-transform-attribute-in-svg.html
-
/css/css-transforms/translate/translate-and-transform-css-property-in-svg.html
- /css/css-transforms/translate/translate-in-svg.html
These tests seem to fail due to the filter effect implementation in
resvg either not being complete or spec compliant.
- /css/filter-effects/feconvolve-divisor.html
- /css/filter-effects/feconvolve-region-001.html
- /css/filter-effects/feconvolve-region-002.html
- /css/filter-effects/filter-subregion-01.html
- /css/filter-effects/svg-feimage-002.html
- /css/filter-effects/svg-feimage-003.html
- /css/filter-effects/svg-feimage-004.html
- /css/filter-effects/svg-feoffset-001.html
The test /css/filter-effects/svg-feimage-004.html should ideally PASS
but currently fails because we don't propagate height/width set using
CSS in HTML element to the root SVG, so resvg uses the wrong dimensions
when rendering the children of the SVG.
These failures are due to deficienies in our current implementation
i.e we don't support styling SVG elements using CSS in HTML.
-
/css/css-transforms/gradientTransform/svg-gradientTransform-combination-001.html
- /css/selectors/sharing-in-svg-use.html
The below test fails as our current implementation relies on resvg to
tell us the intrinsic ratio of the SVG, but this doesn't always work
correctly.
- /css/css-sizing/svg-intrinsic-size-005.html
This failure is due to lack of proper fallback to no-op transform in
resvg when the `rotate()` syntax is specified with an invalid list e.g
`rotate(90,)`.
- /css/css-transforms/rotate/svg-rotate-3args-invalid-002.html
This test only passes in CI and based on the raw log output, it seems
that no text inside the SVG is rendered in the CI. This could be an font
stack related issue.
- /css/css-display/display-contents-svg-elements.html
This test asserts that the CSP blocks loads triggered using `use`
elements in SVG. It used to TIMEOUT as without inline SVG support, no
CSP violation event was triggered. It fails now since the event is now
triggered for the load of the SVG itself (our current implementation
loads inline SVGs as serialized base64 data: urls). This doesn't match
the blocked URL in the use element though.
- /content-security-policy/img-src/svg-use-blocked.tentative.html
Signed-off-by: Mukilan Thiyagarajan <mukilan@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mukilan Thiyagarajan <mukilan@igalia.com>
No longer store scroll offsets for elements in the DOM. Instead
consistently get and set these in layout's `ScrollTree`. This more
consistently requires layout to run when querying scroll offsets, which
ensures that they are up-to-date and properly bounded by scrollable
overflow area.
Testing: This causes several WPT tests to start passing, and one to
start
failing. In the case of
`/shadow-dom/scroll-to-the-fragment-in-shadow-tree.html`, I believe the
issue
is that we don't properly handle scrolling and shadow DOM elements.
Before, the
faulty scrolling was hiding this issue.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Previously, layout was handling scrollable overflow and srolling area
calculation separately, only excluding the "unreachable scrollable
overflow region" at the last step. In addition, `position: absolute` was
not included in scrollable overflow calculation.
This change combines the two concepts into a single scrollable overflow
calculation and starts taking into account `position: absolute`.
Finally, `BoxFragment::scrollable_overflow_for_parent` is converted to
use early returns which reduces the amount of indentation.
Fixes#35928.
Fixes#37204.
Testing: This causes some WPT test to pass, but also two to start
failing:
- `/css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-fixed-scroll.html`: This seems
to fail
because script is scrolling past the boundaries of the document. This is
a
failure that was uncovered by the fixed element now being added to the
page's scroll area.
- `/css/css-overflow/overflow-outside-padding.html`: One test has
started to fail
here because now the absolutely positioned element is included in the
scroll area,
and I think there is an issue with how we are placing RTL items with
negative margins.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
This change adds support for rendering static SVG images using the
`resvg` crate, allowing svg sources in the `img` tag and in CSS
`background` and `content` properties. There are some limitations in
using resvg:
1. There is no support for animations or interactivity as these would
require implementing the full DOM layer of SVG specification.
2. Only system fonts can be used for text rendering. There is some
mechanism to provide a custom font resolver to usvg, but that is not
explored in this change.
3. resvg's handling of certain edge cases involving lack of explicit
`width` and `height` on the root svg element deviates from what the
specification expects from browsers. For example, resvg uses the values
in `viewBox` to derive the missing width or height dimension, but
without scaling that dimension to preserve the aspect ratio. It also
doesn't allow overriding this behavior.
Demo screenshot:
<details>
<summary>Source</summary>
```
<style>
#svg1 {
border: 1px solid red;
}
#svg2 {
border: 1px solid red;
width: 300px;
}
#svg3 {
border: 1px solid red;
width: 300px;
height: 200px;
object-fit: contain;
}
#svg4 {
border: 1px solid red;
width: 300px;
height: 200px;
object-fit: cover;
}
#svg5 {
border: 1px solid red;
width: 300px;
height: 200px;
object-fit: fill;
}
#svg6 {
border: 1px solid red;
width: 300px;
height: 200px;
object-fit: none;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div>
<img id="svg1" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/servo/servo/refs/heads/main/resources/servo.svg" alt="Servo logo">
</div>
<div>
<img id="svg2" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/servo/servo/refs/heads/main/resources/servo.svg" alt="Servo logo">
<img id="svg3" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/servo/servo/refs/heads/main/resources/servo.svg" alt="Servo logo">
<img id="svg4" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/servo/servo/refs/heads/main/resources/servo.svg" alt="Servo logo">
</div>
<div>
<img id="svg5" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/servo/servo/refs/heads/main/resources/servo.svg" alt="Servo logo">
<img id="svg6" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/servo/servo/refs/heads/main/resources/servo.svg" alt="Servo logo">
</div>
</body>
```
</details>
---------
Signed-off-by: Mukilan Thiyagarajan <mukilan@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
In the scrollable overflow calcutation, apply CSS transforms to boxes
and scrollable overflow of the descendant. Clip unreachable scrollable
overflow according to it's block start and inline start scrolling
direction. And, renamed `Fragment::scrolling_overflow` to
`Fragment::scrolling_overflow_for_parent` as it was calculating the
scrolling overflow contribution from a child.
Add several WPT tests, testing the transform interaction `rotate`,
`scale`, and `skew` with scrollable overflow. There are several WPT test
that are testing the interaction that not expected from current browsers
implementation according to the spec.
Testing: Existing and new WPT.
Fixes: #36031
---------
Signed-off-by: stevennovaryo <steven.novaryo@gmail.com>
This PR introduces an initial, straightforward implementation for
displaying text selection and the caret.
This is achieved by passing the selection range and insertion point
index down to `TextFragment`, along with the starting offset of each
`TextFragment` to determine the proper range for displaying the caret
and text selection. Additionally, the `selected_style` was passed into
`TextFragment` to specify the background color.
During the final build phase, although whitespace is typically ignored
when constructing glyphs, we still need to retrieve it to render both
the caret and text selection at the correct location. This ensures that
whitespace is not overlooked when the `TextFragment` contains an
insertion point or selection range.
There are several improvements yet to be made, including:
- The caret is static and does not flash.
- The caret is not rendered when the input field is empty. (I suppose
there should be an easy fix somewhere but I haven't found it yet)
**Working Examples**
macOS
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f3622cbe-9fa6-40c0-b2d8-b3a8f9842c28
Windows
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9b008a0d-0011-4c76-a2e2-0e35869a216c
Linux
[Screencast from 03-07-2025 11_05_41
AM.webm](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/09a311ad-f975-4450-a66c-b20be525a5ed)
---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix part of #33237 (But the cursor isn't blinking
yet)
- [x] These changes do not require tests because there's no behavior
change
Signed-off-by: DK Liao <dklassic@gmail.com>
* feat: patch for video layout sizes
added rebase from main 2024/10/05
Co-authored-by: Josh Matthews <josh@joshmatthews.net>
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* feat: take width and height parameters if provided
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* chore: tidy the code and update test expectations
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* feat: handle removing poster
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* chore: update test expectations and remove debug code
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* fix: issues after rebasing to main
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* feat: pass src remove test and tidy
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* chore: clippy fixes
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* chore: update passing test expectations
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* fix object-position-svg test
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* fix unintentional override of video size and resize events
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* change how resize events are sent to better match the spec
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* simplify poster mutation handling
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: eri <eri@inventati.org>
* improved handling of intrinsic sizes
- differentiate between natural size and css size
- presentational attributes
- fallback ratio for video element
- handle more cases where the src/poster are added/removed
- aspect ratio hints
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* update test expectations
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* fix cleaning current frame
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* update test expectations
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: eri <eri@inventati.org>
* More code review suggestions
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* Prevent aspect-ratio:auto from pulling the ratio from the default object size
As resolved in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7524#issuecomment-1204462924
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: eri <eri@inventati.org>
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Josh Matthews <josh@joshmatthews.net>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
