Follow the specification and make OffscreenCanvas objects are
transferable,
but not in case if there are a weak reference to placeholder canvas
element.
To handle it properly need to implement dedicated frame
provider/dispatcher
between canvas element (script thread) and offscreen canvas (dedicated
worker thread).
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/#the-offscreencanvas-interface:transferable-objects
Testing: Improvements in the following tests
-
html/canvas/element/drawing-images-to-the-canvas/2d.drawImage.detachedcanvas.html
-
html/canvas/offscreen/manual/convert-to-blob/offscreencanvas.convert.to.blob*
-
html/canvas/offscreen/manual/the-offscreen-canvas/offscreencanvas.transfer*
-
html/infrastructure/safe-passing-of-structured-data/transfer-errors.window.js
Part of #24276
Signed-off-by: Andrei Volykhin <andrei.volykhin@gmail.com>
According to specification ImageBitmap objects are serializable objects
and transferable objects.
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/#the-imagebitmap-interface:imagebitmap-11
Testing:
- html/canvas/element/manual/imagebitmap/*
- html/infrastructure/safe-passing-of-structured-data/*
- html/webappapis/structured-clone/*
- workers/semantics/structured-clone/*
Signed-off-by: Andrei Volykhin <andrei.volykhin@gmail.com>
Implement
[disentangle](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/#disentangle)
Remove bespoke gc logic which now becomes unnecessary.
Adds a wpt test that hits the "disentangle while in transfer" logic.
Updates streams code, fixing an error where disentanglement is
conditional on an error.
Test coverage: there are existing tests in
`/webmessaging/message-channels/close-event/explicitly-closed.tentative.window.js`
for the no transfer case, and the simple completed transfer case, and
this PR adds a test for the more complicated transfer in progress case.
Fix https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/36465
---------
Signed-off-by: gterzian <2792687+gterzian@users.noreply.github.com>
In #36364 I moved both serializable and transferable implementations
from the `script_traits` crate into a single file called
`message_ports.rs`. Gregory raised the point that this was a bit of a
inaccurate grouping. This change attempts to fix it according to the
division in the specification.
See [the relevant thread on zulip][thread].
[thread]:
https://servo.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/263398-general/topic/Organizing.20*_traits.20crates/near/510864104.
Testing: Covered by existing test as this is just code movement.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
