This is simpler, and has been successfully shipped in Blink.
See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12053 for more
information.
Testing: Improves WPT tests.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
The metadata provided by usvg has unreliable sizes. Ignore it, and rely
on the `width`, `height` and `viewBox` attributes instead.
Note that inline SVG with a natural aspect ratio but no natural sizes
should stretch to the containing block. This is left for a follow-up.
Bumps Stylo to https://github.com/servo/stylo/pull/229
Testing: Improves several WPT.
---------
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mukilan Thiyagarajan <mukilan@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Mukilan Thiyagarajan <mukilan@igalia.com>
This patch adds support for rendering static inline SVG documents in the
DOM tree by serializing the SVGElement's subtree and leveraging the
existing resvg based SVG stack for rendering. Serialiing the subtree is
necessary as resvg's tree representation (roxmltree) is immutable, so we
can't construct the tree incrementally.
Few other design choices here:
1. The `SVGSVGElement` is now treated as a replaced element and the
layout code is responsible for plumbing the serialized SVG source
(encoded as a base64 data: url) into the image cache, much like how
background images are handled.
2. The serialization is done on the script thread after an initial
layout pass. This is necessary because the serialization code asserts
that it is invoked from script thread i.e we can't call it from layout
workers.
3. The serialized SVG data: url is cached to avoid recomputing it on
subsequent layouts. The cache is invalidated when the SVGSVGElement's
subtree is mutated.
The original SVGSVGElement code was behind the `dom_svg_enabled` pref.
This patch also removes the preference and make SVG support using resvg
available unconditionally.
Below is the analysis of the new test failures:
These tests use inline SVG but used to pass by accident.
They now fail because they contain SVG with no intrinsic
sizing which is not handled by resvg in a way that would
allows us to distinguish it from the sized case. The same
limitation applies to non-inline SVG.
- /css/CSS2/positioning/absolute-replaced-width-003a.xht
- /css/CSS2/positioning/absolute-replaced-width-003b.xht
- /css/CSS2/positioning/absolute-replaced-width-003c.xht
These tests employ CSS styles in the HTML that
target the elements in inline SVG, which is not currently
supported.
-
/css/compositing/mix-blend-mode/mix-blend-mode-plus-lighter-svg-basic.html
- /css/compositing/mix-blend-mode/mix-blend-mode-plus-lighter-svg.html
This is a tentative test that uses the unsupported 'border-shape' CSS
property. The ref uses SVG, so it used to pass accidentally. The ref
still doesn't render correctly since it also relies on styling SVG
elements using CSS classes in the HTML (instead of inline in SVG).
- /css/css-borders/tentative/border-shape/border-shape-stroke.html
These tests use the attribute 'clip-path=circle(...)' in the
test, but this doesn't seem to work in resvg.
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-borderBox-1b.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-contentBox-1b.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-contentBox-1c.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-fillBox-1b.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-marginBox-1a.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-paddingBox-1b.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-strokeBox-1b.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-strokeBox-1c.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-viewBox-1a.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-viewBox-1b.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-viewBox-1d.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/svg-clip-path-circle-offset.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/svg-clip-path-ellipse-offset.html
Additionally, the below two tests use a `foreignObject` SVG element
which
embeds a html div fragment. This is also not supported by resvg.
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-viewBox-1d.html
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-fillBox-1b.html
The following test fails because of apparent pixel differences
between a circle rendered purely using CSS clip-path vs a circle
rendered in SVG using resvg.
- /css/css-masking/clip-path/clip-path-contentBox-1c.html
These tests style the inline SVG elements using CSS in the HTML or
separate stylesheet. This is not supported by this implementation.
- /css-transforms/document-styles/svg-document-styles-{001..004}.html
- /css-transforms/document-styles/svg-document-styles-012.html
- /css-transforms/external-styles/svg-external-styles-{001..004}.html
- /css-transforms/external-styles/svg-external-styles-014.html
These tests seem like they should pass, but they fail because of what
seems like an anti-aliasing issue in the rendering engine. The
transformed element has a thin outline which is causing pixel difference
with the ref:
- /css/css-transforms/group/svg-transform-group-008.html
- /css/css-transforms/group/svg-transform-group-009.html
- /css/css-transforms/group/svg-transform-nested-009.html
- /css/css-transforms/group/svg-transform-nested-013.html
- /css/css-transforms/group/svg-transform-nested-014.html
- /css/css-transforms/group/svg-transform-nested-018.html
- /css/css-transforms/group/svg-transform-nested-019.html
- /css/css-transforms/group/svg-transform-nested-008.html
The below tests fail because resvg is calculating the wrong size for the
'rect' inside the SVG. The dimensions of the SVG are established via the
CSS in the HTML, so it seems resvg is using incorrect coordinates for
the children of the svg when explict width/height are not specified in
the root svg element.
- /css/css-transforms/group/svg-transform-group-011.html
- /css/css-transforms/group/svg-transform-nested-021.html
- /css/css-transforms/group/svg-transform-nested-029.html
All these tests use an SVG that doesn't have width nor height attributes
and this causes resvg to use incorrect coordinates for the SVG's
children. In addition, the following tests use the CSS syntax for
transforms inside the SVG (using style attribute) which is not supported
by resvg (it only supports the SVG 1.1 transform syntax).
- /css/css-transforms/inline-styles/svg-inline-styles-{001..004}.html
- /css/css-transforms/inline-styles/svg-inline-styles-012.html
In the case of these four tests, the `style` attribute specifies an
invalid transform, but resvg doesn't fallback to the transform specified
via the `transform` attribute on the same element.
- /css/css-transforms/inline-styles/svg-inline-styles-005.html
- /css/css-transforms/inline-styles/svg-inline-styles-006.html
- /css/css-transforms/inline-styles/svg-inline-styles-010.html
- /css/css-transforms/inline-styles/svg-inline-styles-013.html
The following test fails because of the lack of width/height in SVG as
described above but it also exposes gaps in our CSS tranform
implementation.
- /css/css-transforms/preserve3d-and-filter-with-perspective.html
These tests failure because resvg doesn't handle the SVG without
explicit width and height, but specified via CSS in the HTML. In
addition, there are pixel differences between the ref due to
antialiasing issues.
- /css/css-transforms/matrix/svg-matrix-{005...008}.html
- /css/css-transforms/matrix/svg-matrix-010.html
- /css/css-transforms/matrix/svg-matrix-012.html
- /css/css-transforms/matrix/svg-matrix-{015..069}.html
- /css/css-transforms/rotate/svg-rotate-angle-45-001.html
- /css/css-transforms/rotate/svg-rotate-angle-45-011.html
- /css/css-transforms/rotate/svg-rotate-angle-45-022.html
- /css/css-transforms/scale/svg-scale-006.html
- /css/css-transforms/scale/svg-scale-007.html
These tests seem to be failing due to some sort of antialiasing issue,
where a transformed SVG element has a thin border that causes pixel
differences compared to the solid colored reference.
- /css/css-transforms/skewX/svg-skewx-001.html
- /css/css-transforms/skewX/svg-skewx-006.html
- /css/css-transforms/skewX/svg-skewx-011.html
- /css/css-transforms/skewX/svg-skewx-016.html
- /css/css-transforms/skewX/svg-skewx-021.html
- /css/css-transforms/skewX/svg-skewxy-001.html
- /css/css-transforms/skewY/svg-skewy-001.html
- /css/css-transforms/skewY/svg-skewy-006.html
- /css/css-transforms/skewY/svg-skewy-011.html
- /css/css-transforms/skewY/svg-skewy-016.html
- /css/css-transforms/skewY/svg-skewy-021.html
These tests specify several SVG attributes such as transform,
vector-effect etc via CSS in the HTML (rather than inline in SVG). The
current implementation doesn't support this.
- /css/css-transforms/transform-box/stroke-box-mutation-001.html
- /css/css-transforms/transform-box/stroke-box-mutation-002.html
- /css/css-transforms/transform-box/stroke-box-mutation-003.html
- /css/css-transforms/transform-box/stroke-box-mutation-004.html
- /css/css-transforms/transform-box/svgbox-stroke-box-002.html
- /css/css-transforms/transform-box/svgbox-stroke-box-003.html
- /css/css-transforms/transform-box/svgbox-stroke-box-004.html
- /css/css-transforms/transform-box/svgbox-stroke-box-005.html
These tests depend on 'transform-origin' specified on an element inside
an SVG, but this transform is influenced by the 'tranform-box' set via
CSS in the HTML itself (not the SVG). The current implementation doesn't
support styling the SVG using document styles, so these tests just fail.
- /css/css-transforms/transform-origin/svg-origin-relative-length-*.html
These tests check the fallback behaviour when invalid syntax is
encountered in the 'transform-origin' value. resvg doesn't correctly
fallback to 0,0 causing the tests to fail.
-
/css/css-transforms/transform-origin/svg-origin-relative-length-invalid-001.html
-
/css/css-transforms/transform-origin/svg-origin-relative-length-invalid-002.html
-
/css/css-transforms/transform-origin/svg-origin-relative-length-invalid-003.html
-
/css/css-transforms/transform-origin/svg-origin-relative-length-invalid-004.html
These tests use unimplemented Canvas APIs like 'beginLayer' and
the 'CanvasFilter' constructor and hence fail at runtime.
-
/html/canvas/element/filters/2d.filter.canvasFilterObject.gaussianBlur.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/element/filters/2d.filter.layers.gaussianBlur.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/element/layers/2d.layer.anisotropic-blur.isotropic.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/element/layers/2d.layer.anisotropic-blur.mostly-x.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/element/layers/2d.layer.anisotropic-blur.mostly-y.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/element/layers/2d.layer.anisotropic-blur.x-only.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/element/layers/2d.layer.anisotropic-blur.y-only.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/element/layers/2d.layer.css-filters.blur-and-shadow.tentative.html
- /html/canvas/element/layers/2d.layer.css-filters.blur.tentative.html
- /html/canvas/element/layers/2d.layer.css-filters.shadow.tentative.html
- /html/canvas/element/layers/2d.layer.ctm.layer-filter.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/offscreen/filters/2d.filter.canvasFilterObject.dropShadow.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/offscreen/filters/2d.filter.canvasFilterObject.gaussianBlur.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/offscreen/filters/2d.filter.layers.dropShadow.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/offscreen/filters/2d.filter.layers.gaussianBlur.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/offscreen/layers/2d.layer.anisotropic-blur.isotropic.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/offscreen/layers/2d.layer.anisotropic-blur.mostly-x.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/offscreen/layers/2d.layer.anisotropic-blur.mostly-y.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/offscreen/layers/2d.layer.anisotropic-blur.x-only.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/offscreen/layers/2d.layer.anisotropic-blur.y-only.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/offscreen/layers/2d.layer.css-filters.blur-and-shadow.tentative.html
- /html/canvas/offscreen/layers/2d.layer.css-filters.blur.tentative.html
-
/html/canvas/offscreen/layers/2d.layer.css-filters.shadow.tentative.html
- /html/canvas/offscreen/layers/2d.layer.ctm.layer-filter.tentative.html
These tests fail because resvg doesn't seem to honour the 'translate'
CSS property specified on an SVG element using an inline 'style'
attribute.
- /css/css-transforms/translate/svg-translate-with-units.html
-
/css/css-transforms/translate/translate-and-transform-attribute-in-svg.html
-
/css/css-transforms/translate/translate-and-transform-css-property-in-svg.html
- /css/css-transforms/translate/translate-in-svg.html
These tests seem to fail due to the filter effect implementation in
resvg either not being complete or spec compliant.
- /css/filter-effects/feconvolve-divisor.html
- /css/filter-effects/feconvolve-region-001.html
- /css/filter-effects/feconvolve-region-002.html
- /css/filter-effects/filter-subregion-01.html
- /css/filter-effects/svg-feimage-002.html
- /css/filter-effects/svg-feimage-003.html
- /css/filter-effects/svg-feimage-004.html
- /css/filter-effects/svg-feoffset-001.html
The test /css/filter-effects/svg-feimage-004.html should ideally PASS
but currently fails because we don't propagate height/width set using
CSS in HTML element to the root SVG, so resvg uses the wrong dimensions
when rendering the children of the SVG.
These failures are due to deficienies in our current implementation
i.e we don't support styling SVG elements using CSS in HTML.
-
/css/css-transforms/gradientTransform/svg-gradientTransform-combination-001.html
- /css/selectors/sharing-in-svg-use.html
The below test fails as our current implementation relies on resvg to
tell us the intrinsic ratio of the SVG, but this doesn't always work
correctly.
- /css/css-sizing/svg-intrinsic-size-005.html
This failure is due to lack of proper fallback to no-op transform in
resvg when the `rotate()` syntax is specified with an invalid list e.g
`rotate(90,)`.
- /css/css-transforms/rotate/svg-rotate-3args-invalid-002.html
This test only passes in CI and based on the raw log output, it seems
that no text inside the SVG is rendered in the CI. This could be an font
stack related issue.
- /css/css-display/display-contents-svg-elements.html
This test asserts that the CSP blocks loads triggered using `use`
elements in SVG. It used to TIMEOUT as without inline SVG support, no
CSP violation event was triggered. It fails now since the event is now
triggered for the load of the SVG itself (our current implementation
loads inline SVGs as serialized base64 data: urls). This doesn't match
the blocked URL in the use element though.
- /content-security-policy/img-src/svg-use-blocked.tentative.html
Signed-off-by: Mukilan Thiyagarajan <mukilan@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mukilan Thiyagarajan <mukilan@igalia.com>
We were instead stretching to the containing block, which implied that
the behaviors of a `stretch` size and `stretch` alignment weren't
consistent.
As resolved by the CSSWG, the behavior will now be:
- If the cross size of the line is known, stretch to the line.
- Otherwise, stretch to the containing block.
See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11784
This aligns us with Blink, which has already shipped this new behavior.
Testing: Improves existing WPT and adds a new test.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This change aligns Servo with both Blink and WebKit in common cases.
When the `aspect-ratio` property is set to a different value than the
natural ratio, then Blink and WebKit disagree, we match Blink.
Gecko doesn't support intrinsic min/max block sizes at all.
Note this patch doesn't fix the intrinsic contributions, they will need
to be addressed in a follow-up patch.
Testing: Covered by WPT
Fixes: #37433
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This change adds support for rendering static SVG images using the
`resvg` crate, allowing svg sources in the `img` tag and in CSS
`background` and `content` properties. There are some limitations in
using resvg:
1. There is no support for animations or interactivity as these would
require implementing the full DOM layer of SVG specification.
2. Only system fonts can be used for text rendering. There is some
mechanism to provide a custom font resolver to usvg, but that is not
explored in this change.
3. resvg's handling of certain edge cases involving lack of explicit
`width` and `height` on the root svg element deviates from what the
specification expects from browsers. For example, resvg uses the values
in `viewBox` to derive the missing width or height dimension, but
without scaling that dimension to preserve the aspect ratio. It also
doesn't allow overriding this behavior.
Demo screenshot:
<details>
<summary>Source</summary>
```
<style>
#svg1 {
border: 1px solid red;
}
#svg2 {
border: 1px solid red;
width: 300px;
}
#svg3 {
border: 1px solid red;
width: 300px;
height: 200px;
object-fit: contain;
}
#svg4 {
border: 1px solid red;
width: 300px;
height: 200px;
object-fit: cover;
}
#svg5 {
border: 1px solid red;
width: 300px;
height: 200px;
object-fit: fill;
}
#svg6 {
border: 1px solid red;
width: 300px;
height: 200px;
object-fit: none;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div>
<img id="svg1" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/servo/servo/refs/heads/main/resources/servo.svg" alt="Servo logo">
</div>
<div>
<img id="svg2" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/servo/servo/refs/heads/main/resources/servo.svg" alt="Servo logo">
<img id="svg3" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/servo/servo/refs/heads/main/resources/servo.svg" alt="Servo logo">
<img id="svg4" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/servo/servo/refs/heads/main/resources/servo.svg" alt="Servo logo">
</div>
<div>
<img id="svg5" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/servo/servo/refs/heads/main/resources/servo.svg" alt="Servo logo">
<img id="svg6" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/servo/servo/refs/heads/main/resources/servo.svg" alt="Servo logo">
</div>
</body>
```
</details>
---------
Signed-off-by: Mukilan Thiyagarajan <mukilan@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Testing: No tests, if `test-wpt` broke again then we would notice pretty
quickly.
Fixes: https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/37124
---------
Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
Spec: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-3/#funcdef-width-fit-content
It's similar to the `fit-content` keyword but, instead of clamping the
stretch size between `min-content` and `max-content`, it clamps the
provided argument.
So now that we support `fit-content`, it's quite straightforward to add.
It's just not completely clear what should happen when the argument has
a cyclic percentage, so this may need some further adjustments depending
on the outcome of https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11805
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
The static position rect is calculated assuming that the containing
block would be established by the content box of some ancestor, but the
actual containing block is established by the padding box.
So we need to add the padding of that ancestor.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Adds support for min-content, max-content, fit-content and stretch on
the min and max main size properties of a flex item.
I'm removing `automatic_min_size()` and `flex_base_size()` because they
would need to share so much code among themselves and their one caller
that it's simpler to just inline the code.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
`block_size_is_zero_or_intrinsic()` was always returning true for
`stretch`. This function is used for the margin collapse heuristics
in block layout, so we were considering that an empty element with
`height: stretch` would self-collapse.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
In #35630 I treated an indefinite `stretch` as 0px on min sizing
properties, and as `none` on max sizing properties. However, this was
only for final layout sizes, I forgot about intrinsic contributions.
Blink already modified the relevant test, I'm just reordering it a bit
since we are no longer treating `stretch` as `fit-content`, so it seems
better to test it at the end.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
The CSSWG resolved that `block-size: stretch` on a block-level box
stretches the margin box to fill the parent. However, if the parent
doesn't have padding nor border, and doesn't establish an independent
formatting context, then we assume that the margins will collapse.
Therefore, we treat the margins as zero when resolving the stretch size,
regardless of whether they will actually end up collapsing.
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11044#issuecomment-2599101601https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-4/#stretch-fit-sizing
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Adds support for min-content, max-content, fit-content and stretch on
the min and max cross size properties of a flex item.
With one exception: when resolving the main sizes, transferred cross
minimums and maximums will still ignore keywords.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Two floats with `width: 50%` each should fit on the same line,
and four floats with `width: 25%` each should fit on the same line.
That's even if the containing block width, expressed in layout units,
cannot be divided by 2 or 4.
This test checks cases that are tricky for browsers where 1 pixel
are either 60, 64 or 100 layout units.
It passes on other browsers but fails on Servo because of #34665.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This changes `FlexItem::content_cross_size` into `Size<Au>` to preserve
keyword sizes. The calculation of the hypothetical cross size still
ignores them though, that will be addressed in a follow-up.
Also, browsers don't follow the spec and treat a stretch size different
than a stretch alignment: the former stretches to the containing block,
while the latter stretches to the line. This aligns Servo with that
behavior (following the spec would require bigger refactorings), so
`stretches()` is renamed to `stretches_to_line()` for clarity.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
An intrinsic flex base size depends on the contents, which may depend on
the cross size through an aspect ratio. We were only taking this into
account if the preferred cross size was numeric, but `auto` or `stretch`
can also be definite.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
We were always treating an indefinite `stretch` as the automatic size.
This instead treats it as `0px` on min sizing properties, and as `none`
on max sizing properties, aligning with Blink and this recent CSSWG
resolution: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11006
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* Add tests for sizing keywords on flex items
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* layout: Partial support for sizing keywords on flex items
When a flex item has `flex-basis: auto`, the used `flex-basis` is the
value of the main size property. In that case, if the main size property
was set to keyword, we were always assuming it was `auto`. Now we handle
non-`auto` keywords correctly.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
layout: Basic implementation of size keywords on `flex-basis`
This splits the logic to resolve the used value of `flex-basis` into its
own method, which preserves size keywords.
And then it changes `flex_base_size()` to resolve the provided keywords
properly. However, it doesn't handle size keywords in the cross axis.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
`width` and `max-width` typically treat expressions with percentages as
their initial value, but for the min-content contribution of replaced
elements, they should instead be treated as zero.
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-3/#replaced-percentage-min-contribution
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Block layout uses some heuristics to guess whether margins are separated
by clearance and then don't collapse. These heuristics now take the
min-content, max-content, fit-content and stretch sizing keywords into
account.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Consider:
```html
<div style="position: relative; width: 50px; height: 50px; border: solid; margin: 5px">
<div style="position: absolute; top: 0; bottom: 0; height: max-content">
<canvas width="25" height="25" style="background: cyan; height: 100%"></canvas>
</div>
</div>
```
In order to determine the inline min/max-content sizes, we need a
tentative block size as the input, which only takes extrinsic values
into account.
In this case `height: max-content` is intrinsic, so we were treating it
as `height: initial`, which would behave as a definite `height: stretch`.
Therefore, the canvas was able to resolve its percentage.
However, it seems weird to treat an explicitly intrinsic keyword in an
extrinsic way, and Blink doesn't do it. So now we treat the tentative
block size as indefinite, therefore the percentage behaves as auto.
This adds a new test, we were previously failing 6 subtests, now only 3.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Adds support for min-content, max-content, fit-content and stretch,
for block-level elements that don't establish an independent formatting
context, and for block-level elements when there is no float.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
We were sizing absolutely positioned replaced elements within their
actual containing block instead of the inset-modified containing block.
Then the `stretch` keyword would result in a wrong size.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
We were using the preferred aspect ratio provided by the `aspect-ratio`
property instead of the natural aspect ratio. However, the preferred
aspect ratio should only be used to size the replaced element. To paint
the replaced contents into that element we need the natural ratio.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
