The specification doesn't say how to deal with percentages when
determining the minimum and maximum size of a table grid, so follow the
approach that Chromium uses.
Essentially, figure out the "missing" percentage from the non-percentage
columns and then use that to work backwards to fine the size of the
percentage ones.
This change is larger than one might expect, because this percentage
approach shouldn't happen for tables that are descendants of a flex,
grid or table container (except when there is an interceding absolute).
We have to pass this information down when building the box tree. This
will also make it easier to improve propagated text decorations in the
future.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
We were only parsing the `width` attribute as a presentation hint for
`<table>`, `<td>` and `<th>`. This patch also handles `<colgroup>` and
`<col>`.
Also, we weren't parsing `height` at all, now we do it for `<table>`,
`<td>`, `<th>`, `<tr>`, `<tbody>`, `<thead>` and `<tfoot>`.
One test is now crashing, but this was an existing issue: #33423
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
* Fix size of tables in flow layout
The contents of a table can make it bigger than what we would expect
from its 'width', 'min-width', 'height' and ' min-height' properties.
Also, 'width: auto' doesn't stretch it to fill the containing block.
We had to refactor the resolution of margins to happen after layout,
otherwise 'auto' margins wouldn't align correctly.
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
* Feedback
* Consistently use `containing_block_for_table` in table layout
* Update test result
---------
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
