Use the is_absolute_containing_block method everywhere
This is a better approach than relying on
contains_positioned_fragments, because in the future other properties
will create absolute containing blocks.
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [x] These changes do not require tests because they do not change behavior.
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18112)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Unwrap function before calling IsConstructor
`IsConstructor` returns true for all wrappers that are callable. Wrapped
arrow functions are callable and thus `IsConstructor` will return true
if given one; however, if we unwrap the arrow function, `IsConstructor`
will return false. The latter is the correct behavior here.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/17250)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Remove unused StackingContextType
This hasn't been in use for quite some time.
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [x] These changes do not require tests because they do not change behavior.
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18107)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
This is a better approach than relying on
contains_positioned_fragments, because in the future other properties
will create absolute containing blocks.
Don't allow interpolating 'fill:none' with 'fill:none'
From [Gecko bug 1390364](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1390364).
In SMIL we don't expect the 'none' value of the 'fill' property to be additive and hence the following animation should have no effect:
```svg
<rect width="100" height="100" y="100" fill="blue">
<animate attributeName="fill" dur="3s" from="red" by="none"/>
</rect>
```
Although SMIL doesn't make this entirely clear, [it says](https://www.w3.org/TR/smil-animation/#AnimFuncValues) that "by animation" and "from-by animation" may only be used "with attributes that support addition (e.g. most numeric attributes)" and [SVG says](https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/animate.html#AnimationAttributesAndProperties) that `<paint>`s are "only additive if each value can be converted to an RGB color". As a result, the animation above should have no effect.
By extrapolation, animating from 'none' by 'none' should also have no effect:
```svg
<rect width="100" height="100" y="100" fill="blue">
<animate attributeName="fill" dur="3s" from="none" by="none"/>
</rect>
```
However, in Servo's interpolation of `<paint>`s we special case the interpolation and addition of 'none' such that if both values are 'none' it is allowed.
We should disallow this in order to produce the expected behavior and in order to match Gecko's behavior.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18103)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
This moves us to clear on rebuild, which allows us to remove yet another place
where we track stylist dirtiness.
Bug: 1390255
Reviewed-by: heycam
MozReview-Commit-ID: nihQbUAbh8
Signed-off-by: Emilio Cobos Álvarez <emilio@crisal.io>
In SMIL we don't expect the 'none' value of the 'fill' property to be
additive and hence the following animation should have no effect:
<rect width="100" height="100" y="100" fill="blue">
<animate attributeName="fill" dur="3s" from="red" by="none"/>
</rect>
Although SMIL doesn't make this entirely clear, [1] says that "by
animation" and "from-by animation" may only be used "with attributes
that support addition (e.g. most numeric attributes)" and [2] says that
<paint>s are "only additive if each value can be converted to an RGB
color". As a result, the animation above should have no effect.
By extrapolation, animating from 'none' by 'none' should also have no
effect:
<rect width="100" height="100" y="100" fill="blue">
<animate attributeName="fill" dur="3s" from="none" by="none"/>
</rect>
However, in Servo's interpolation of <paint>s we special case the
interpolation and addition of 'none' such that if both values are 'none'
it is allowed.
We should disallow this in order to produce the expected behavior and in
order to match Gecko's behavior.
[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/smil-animation/#AnimFuncValues
[2] https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/animate.html#AnimationAttributesAndProperties
Make emtpy rule can be inserted into rule tree
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
We really want to ensure empty rule nodes appear in the rule tree for devtools, this condition ensures that if we find an empty rule node, we insert it at the normal level.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix [Bug 1384802](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1384802)
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [X] These changes do not require tests because of the test cases are in Gecko.
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18099)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Bindgen bitfield enums don't work as return values with the Linux 32-bit ABI at
the moment because they wrap the value in a struct.
This causes the Rust side to believe the callee expects space for the struct
return value, while C++ believes it's just an integer value.
MozReview-Commit-ID: FRBqlZuMiAR
Update Firefox version in user agent
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
GitHub has started throwing warnings about using an outdated version of Firefox when loaded with Servo. I am assuming that this is due to Servo using Firefox 37.0 in its user agent which was set in 2015 and hasn't been updated since then. I don't know if updating this should cause any site compatibility issues or not.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [ ] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [ ] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18040)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Make content animatable
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] There are tests for these changes. The test codes are patch part 3 and 4 in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1382136
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18085)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
cleanup embedder/compositor/constellation/script messages
Fix: #17226#17200#17201
This is work in progress. Some tests still fail.
I'd like to get early feedback as it's a pretty large PR.
There is nothing fundamentally new. Basically, I added TopLevelBrowsingContrextId to the relevant messages between the embedder, the compositor and the constellation, and enforced the PipelineId to be attached to each ScriptMsg (see #17201).
I unaliased all the ScriptMsg. It was getting difficult to understand the nature of the message as ScriptMsg was used aliased CompositorMsg sometimes (CompositorMsg is an actually type of message already). I renamed constellation_chan to script_to_constellation_chan, again, for clarification.
This cleanup code is necessary for #15934 and for tabs support.
/cc @asajeffrey can I ask you to look at this? No need for a formal review, I need feedback at this stage.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/17425)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Don't convert zero component value to 'auto' in clone__moz_image_region.
Currently Gecko treats 'auto' component value as zero for animation.
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1387951
---
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18079)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
