Stop returning an Option from Window::browsing_context.
A Window always has a WindowProxy; the only reason it's wrapped in a nullable
field is the order in which those objects are created.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="40" alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/9729)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
According to JSProxy.h, without this the default implementation calls
ownPropertyKeys and filters out the unenumerable properties. We know when such
things exist so we don't need to do that.
Implement XHR::SetRequestHeader Step 3
Closes#9548.
Alternative implementation of #9595.
cc @timvandermeij
I'm not sure if a utility method on `ByteString` is the best place for this functionality, maybe a free function in XHR module would be more suitable.
Also where would be the correct place to add a test for this functionality (if required)?
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="40" alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/9598)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
The code was split into the following two abstractions.
- OneshotTimers can be used to schedule arbitrary oneshot timers, such
as XHR-Timeouts.
- JsTimers (`setTimeout` and `setInterval`) which use OneshotTimers to
schedule individual callbacks.
With this change the implementation (of JsTimers in particular) is in
much closer alignment with the specification.
Add methods to move ByteStrings underlying bytes
Add methods to move the underlying `Vec<u8>` for `ByteString`.
I saw this as at least two methods. One to "move and replace with and empty Vec<u8> (`bytes`), and one to take ownership of the whole object (`own_bytes`). I typically also don't like adding methods with out unit tests. If you think they're unnecessary, just let me know.
As always, please let me know if you have any comments, critiques, or nits!
Fixes#9655
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="40" alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/9684)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
mozbrowsersecuritychange event
Fixes#8544
No test yet. Is there a way to mock a https connection?
Also, I wish I could use the `HTTPSState` enum instead of a `String` when calling `trigger_mozbrowser_event` (https://github.com/servo/servo/compare/master...paulrouget:securitychange?expand=1#diff-30a18e04d7e0b66aafdf192e416cad44R306) but that would require `constellation_msg.rs` to know about `HTTPSState`, which is defined in `document.rs`, which would add a dependency to `components/msg`. I could define `HTTPSState` somewhere else maybe? Or maybe it's fine to use a `String`. But then, should I use the HTTPSState strings (`"modern/deprecated/none"`) or the mozbrowser strings (`"secure/insecure/broken"`) (as it is now)
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/9244)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
