During layout it is often useful, for various specification reasons, to
know if an element is the `<body>` element of an `<html>` element root. There
are a couple places where a brittle heuristic is used to detect `<body>`
elements. This information is going to be even more important to
properly handle `<html>` elements that inherit their overflow property from
their `<body>` children.
Implementing this properly requires updating the DOM wrapper interface.
This check does reach up to the parent of thread-safe nodes, but this is
essentially the same kind of operation that `parent_style()` does, so is
ostensibly safe.
This change should not change any behavior and is just a preparation
step for properly handle `<body>` overflow.
Manage containing blocks and WebRender SpaceAndClip during stacking
context tree constuction using the ContainingBlockInfo data structure.
This will allow us to reuse this data structure whenever we traverse the
fragment tree. In addition, StackingContextBuilder is no longer
necessary at all. This change also fixes some bugs where fixed position
fragments were not placed in the correct spatial node. Unfortunately,
these fixes are difficult to test because of #29659.
It was only applied to the 1st inline formatting context of a block
container. Other IFCs were created with the Default trait, implying
TextDecorationLine::NONE.
… and converting them to flow-relative geometric values.
These values are almost always used to size and position a fragment within its containing block, so using the mode of the containing block seems more correct.
Note that the `writing-mode` and `direction` properties are disabled in Servo at the moment, so this PR by itself should have no effect: the writing mode of an element is always the same of that of its containing block since they’re both horizontal rtl.
We want to mutate them when lazily computing their content sizes, but they
are behind an Arc for the hoisting infra, so it also needs its own layer
of inner mutability.
We want to compute content sizes on demand rather than eagerly so we will
need to mutate the independent formatting contexts that own the content sizes.
This avoids the use of lookup tables for containing blocks when
constructing the stacking context tree.
This seems to catch some laid-out hoisted fragments that were otherwise
dropped in the previous design. The changes cause one new test to pass
and one to fail. Visual examination of the failing tests reveals that
it's a progression (list markers are appearing when they were previously
not rendered).
Add support for tracking containing blocks when doing inline layout.
This requires setting up a PositioningContext for inline boxes when
necessary. Instead of using the PositioningContext helper methods
and we reuse the contexts between line breaks.
Fixes#25279.
Instead of painting hoisted position fragments in the order to which
they are hoisted, paint them in tree order and properly incorporate them
into the stacking context.
We do this by creating a placeholder fragment in the original tree position
of hoisted fragments. The ghost fragment contains an atomic id which
links back to the hoisted fragment in the containing block.
While building the stacking context, we keep track of containing blocks
and their children. When encountering a placeholder fragment we look at
the containing block's hoisted children in order to properly paint the
hoisted fragment.
One notable design modification in this change is that hoisted fragments
no longer need an AnonymousFragment as their parent. Instead they are
now direct children of the fragment that establishes their containing block.
This method doesn't actually do any layout, but converts this block to a
HoistedAbsolutelyPositionedBox which is hoisted and then laid-out with
its containing block later. This makes the code a little easier to read.
It's not possible anymore, in the presence of min() / max(), to split a
<length-percentage> value into a <length> and a <percentage> component.
Tweak word_spacing to do what Gecko does (resolving it in advance).
Iits details are now private to the module.
It has a couple methods that take closures to make sure that "before" and "after" steps are done together:
* In an absolutely positioned box, take care of nested abspos (establish a new containing block, etc.)
* For a box that *might* be `position: relative`, optionally take care of the same.
