style: Add support to the animation shorthand and fix parsing of animation-name
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Part of #11916.
r? @SimonSapin
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/12118)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
The previous behavior is plain wrong, since that array has always at least one
element, so we effectively couldn't specify anything else than "ease" in our
animations.
Add new compositor message to get scroll_offset;
Add new layout query for computed value of overflow-x/y;
Implement layer_id method for ThreadSafeLayoutNode;
Add new layout query for layer_id;
Implement script interface for getting scrollTop and scrollLeft, as well as relavant helper functions.
layout: Make child stacking contexts of fixed position stacking contexts also fixed position.
Improves YouTube.
Improves the Washington Post.
Closes#10526.
r? @glennw
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10529)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
set to be scrolled.
This makes them establish stacking contexts, which is a CSS 2.1 spec
violation. However, we were already violating the spec here for
absolutely-positioned elements with `overflow: scroll`. It will probably
be easier to fix this spec violation once we either switch entirely to
WebRender or we have multiple layers per stacking context.
Closes#2742.
This allows keeping the VertexAttrib* calls asynchronous.
Another option would be to do the validation in the apply() function,
but that'd require us passing an unnecessary channel around and add
extra synchronization.
The counterpart of this is that it has to be updated when the context
changes, but that's less problem.
absolutely-positioned flows separately when storing overflow.
This code dates back to the time when absolutely positioned flows were
ignored by all of their ancestors up to the containing block. This
hasn't been true for at least a year.
Closes#9306.
Closes#9309.
Is a partial fix for #9308.
styles of nodes that represent the dirty node, *including its
pseudo-element*.
Fixes lots more jumpiness.
A manual test, `inline-pseudo-repair-jumpiness.html`, has been added. I
was unable to automate it, so I will file a followup issue on that.
This implements the `canvas`, `drawingBufferHeight` and
`drawingBufferWidth` getters to `WebGLRenderingContext`, and an initial
version of `getParameter`.
r? @jdm
I couldn't add the `getContextAttributes` method since `CodegenRust`
doesn't know how to return a dictionary value, I'll take a look at it ASAP.
I think the helper functions can return directly the renderer, since they're used just for that, but I wanted to hear your opinions about this.
By the way I'm interested in adding more serious tests for WebGL, and I think the [khronos conformance suit](https://github.com/KhronosGroup/WebGL/tree/master/conformance-suites/1.0.3) should be the best option.
Should I try to integrate it in wpt, or making a `tests/webgl` directory (or similar) inside the servo tree? (Maybe this question should be for @Ms2ger)
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6183)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
