These files don't exist in the tree, and the codegen doesn't create them, so we shouldn't have them sitting around in .gitignore.
There are h/cpp files sitting around in the bindings codegen directory; I suppose one could make the argument that they're useful for examples, so we should keep them around, too?
Changes
* Implemented Storage Task
* Used Storage Task in methods of storage.rs
* Updated webstorage test expectations
Pending Changes:
* Handle Storage Event
* Throw QuotaExceededError in case of failure for method setItem
* localStorage as alias of sessionStorage
This adds the infrastructure necessary to support stacking contexts that
are not containing blocks for absolutely-positioned elements. Our
infrastructure did not support that before. This minor revamp actually
ended up simplifying the logic around display list building and
stacking-relative position computation for absolutely-positioned flows,
which was nice.
This will need this PR: https://github.com/servo/rust-azure/pull/112 I have not updated the Cargo.lock file yet because I want the merge commit.
r? @glennw
f? @SimonSapin
This adds the infrastructure necessary to support stacking contexts that
are not containing blocks for absolutely-positioned elements. Our
infrastructure did not support that before. This minor revamp actually
ended up simplifying the logic around display list building and
stacking-relative position computation for absolutely-positioned flows,
which was nice.
When inserting a node that was already dirtied, the dirtying logic
would short circuit: "This node is already dirty? Great! Then its
parents must be HAS_DIRTY_DESCENDANTS, too! Let's skip that step."
This isn't appropriate when nodes move around the tree. In that case,
the node may be marked HAS_CHANGED, but ancestors may not yet have
the HAS_DIRTY_DESCENDANTS flag set.
This patch adds a `content_and_heritage_changed` hook in the document,
to deal with these cases appropriately.
