Make the rule tree actually threadsafe
RuleTree::gc is now a safe method that any thread can call
at any time, and StrongRuleNode values can all be dropped
whenever their owner want to, on any thread.
RuleTree::gc is now a safe method that any thread can call
at any time, and StrongRuleNode values can all be dropped
whenever their owner want to, on any thread.
Replace glutin by winit + surfman 0.2
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
This PR updates surfman to 0.2, and replaces glutin with winit+surfman.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes do not require tests because this should all be invisible
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Always upgrade existing weak child references in the rule tree
Just because we didn't find a child when read-locking a node children list
doesn't mean it still won't exist while we wait to upgrade the read lock
into a write lock to create the child.
Eliminate `AnimationFrame`
This intermediate data structure doesn't really buy us anything and is a
bit confusing.
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #___ (GitHub issue number if applicable)
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [x] These changes do not require tests because they do not change behavior.
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Just because we didn't find a child when read-locking a node children list
doesn't mean it still won't exist while we wait to upgrade the read lock
into a write lock to create the child.
This implements the easy / straight-forward parts of the :where / :is
selectors.
The biggest missing piece is to handle properly invalidation when there
are combinators present inside the :where. That's the hard part of this,
actually.
But this is probably worth landing in the interim. This fixes some of
the visitors that were easy to fix.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D70788
Refactor ImageCache::find_image_or_metadata -> ImageCache::{get_image, track_image}
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Updated the `ImageCache` trait to replace `find_image_or_metadata` with two new functions `track_image` and `get_image`, as well as a new enum (`ImageCacheResult`).
As a result, I was able to refactor the functions that previously called `find_image_or_metadata` pretty cleanly. For a list of these functions, please see the commit information.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#21289 (GitHub issue number if applicable)
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [x] These changes do not require tests because tests already exist for these components. I ran `cargo test` in `net`, `net_traits`, `layout`, and `script` successfully.
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/23661)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
