Correct x and y input for origin_rect
Fix error in construction of the `origin_rect` for `UnioningFragmentBorderBoxIterator`.
r? @asajeffrey
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10444)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Add some machinery to allow us to disable CSS properties/values per-product
Here's an initial stab at solving the issues @SimonSapin brought up in #10408.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10461)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Fixes for insertion point caret rendering
This contains several fixes for the code to position and render the insertion point. The main effect is that the insertion point is now rendered correctly when in an empty input field. See the individual commit messages for more detais. r? @pcwalton
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10361)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Before this fix, if a TextRun containing an insertion point was split into
multiple ScannedText fragments, text layout would draw an insertion point
inside of each of the fragments. This patch records the insertion point
position at most once per TextRun, and copies it only into the appropriate
ScannedText fragment.
This PR mistakenly removed JIT enabling/disabling by preference:
https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/10342/files
Look for `get_pref`.
I'm putting the missing piece of code into the appropriate place in
script_runtime.rs
layout: Allow non-absolutely-positioned elements with `overflow: scroll` set to be scrolled.
This makes them establish stacking contexts, which is a CSS 2.1 spec
violation. However, we were already violating the spec here for
absolutely-positioned elements with `overflow: scroll`. It will probably
be easier to fix this spec violation once we either switch entirely to
WebRender or we have multiple layers per stacking context.
r? @mbrubeck
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10450)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Added --soft-fail option.
At the moment, wptrunner always runs the WPT tests with `servo --hard-fail`. To test hardening, we need to switch off `--hard-fail`. This PR introduces a `--soft-fail` option to do that.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10420)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
set to be scrolled.
This makes them establish stacking contexts, which is a CSS 2.1 spec
violation. However, we were already violating the spec here for
absolutely-positioned elements with `overflow: scroll`. It will probably
be easier to fix this spec violation once we either switch entirely to
WebRender or we have multiple layers per stacking context.
Closes#2742.
This fixes https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/10260 by pulling in
https://github.com/servo/ipc-channel/pull/61 (fix receive for messages
close to packet size) and https://github.com/servo/ipc-channel/pull/62
(properly handle ENOBUFS); where the latter is not critical per se, as
there was a workaround already -- but that workaround aggrevated the
first bug, resulting in the urgent issue...
This bump requires a tidy override for `uuid`: `ipc-channel` was updated
to `uuid 0.2` in https://github.com/servo/ipc-channel/pull/63 (don't
know why...), while other crates are still with `0.1`. That was blocking
this urgent bug fix; and according to a discussion with @mbrubeck on
IRC, the override should be OK in this case.
Move some CSS properties to match Gecko's representation
Fixes#10403. Animation had an extra transition-delay property, which was also moved to Box. Let me know if I should squash the commits.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10407)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Added Uniform{1iv, 2f, 2fv}
The remaining ones need changes to webrender_traits, so I'll have to open a PR there too.
r? @emilio
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10432)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
