layout/context: Wrap `image_cache_thread` in a `Mutex<>` as well
`SharedLayoutContext.image_cache_thread` didn't get the `Mutex<>`
treatment along with all the other channels in there, because
`ipc-channel::Sender` is presently inherently `Sync`. I believe this to
be an implementation accident though, that should be rectified in the
future -- not something users should actually rely on...
Note that sharing senders (be it `mpsc` or `ipc-channel`) in is probably
not a good idea anyway: just cloning them -- and letting them handle the
sharing internally -- should be both simpler and cheaper. But right now
that's how things are handled here; so let's go with the flow...
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14048)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
`SharedLayoutContext.image_cache_thread` didn't get the `Mutex<>`
treatment along with all the other channels in there, because
`ipc-channel::Sender` is presently inherently `Sync`. I believe this to
be an implementation accident though, that should be rectified in the
future -- not something users should actually rely on...
Note that sharing senders (be it `mpsc` or `ipc-channel`) in is probably
not a good idea anyway: just cloning them -- and letting them handle the
sharing internally -- should be both simpler and cheaper. But right now
that's how things are handled here; so let's go with the flow...
Update Rust to 1.14.0-nightly (7c69b0d5a 2016-11-01)
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14028)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
This makes the API used to build display lists quite a bit simpler and
reduces the amount of auxiliary data structures that need to be passed
around. It is also important preparation work for separating scrolling
areas from stacking contexts.
We also make sure that an element never has an ElementData with ElementDataStyles::Uninitialized,
and eagerly call prepare_for_styling whenever an ElementData is instantiated.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 9YP6eSmdMt0
Track overflow:scroll stacking contexts with ScrollRootId instead of StackingContextId
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [x] These changes do not require tests because this PR should not change behavior.
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/13957)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
This is a step in disassociating scrolling areas from stacking
contexts. Now scroll areas are defined by unique ids, which means that
in the future stacking context will be able to contain more than one.
incremental restyle: Hoist more stuff to Element
The patch here hoists pseudo-element handling onto ThreadSafeLayoutElement. I have another patch which hoists stuff from TNode to TElement, but want to make sure this patch passes try first.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/13951)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Instead of maintaining a dummy restyle damage field for text nodes, we can just
perform the necessary parent inheritance and is_changed adjustments on the fly
in ThreadSafeLayoutNode, simplifying the requirements on the style system.
MozReview-Commit-ID: DCqiCRLsLUF
This patch introduces a "legalizer", which encapsulates all the
anonymous flow generation logic in one place. The legalizer knows how
to, for example, place adjacent blocks with `display: table-cell` in the
same table row.
Improves etsy.com.
Closes#13782.
layout: Remove margins from inline absolute hypothetical boxes.
As they're hypothetical, their margins shouldn't take up space!
Improves Google search results.
Closes#13915.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/13923)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
incremental restyle: Introduce StylingMode and deprecate explicit dirtiness
This is another chunk of work to move us toward the new incremental restyle architecture.
Eventually, we'll make a fine-grained decision at each node about what style to recompute based on the RestyleHint on the node data (along with other things). For now, we use the existence of RestyleData as a coarse-grained approximation of this.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/13913)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Prefer auto-generation for some keyword props
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build-geckolib` does not report any errors
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] These changes do not require tests because it's a refactor
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
r? @Manishearth or @emilio
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/13902)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
