* Rename IS_IN_DOC flag to IS_IN_A_DOCUMENT_TREE
Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
* Add BindContext::is_in_a_shadow_tree
Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
* Add UnbindContext::tree_is_in_shadow_tree
Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
* ./mach fmt
Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
* Update test expectations
Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
* fix build after rebasing
Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
---------
Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
Instead of sending a title change for each incremental parsing change, we now do it when:
- the element is bound to the tree.
- the parser is done with the element (in pop()).
- the title content changes after the parsing, eg. using document.title .
Signed-off-by: webbeef <me@webbeef.org>
* Remove script_plugins
* Use crown instead of script_plugins
* crown_is_not_used
* Use crown in command base
* bootstrap crown
* tidy happy
* disable sccache
* Bring crown in tree
* Install crown from tree
* fix windows ci
* fix warning
* fix mac
libscript_plugins.dylib is not available anymore
* Update components/script/lib.rs
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
* Update for nightly-2023-03-18
Mostly just based off https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/30630
* Always install crown
it's slow only when there is new version
* Run crown test with `mach test-unit`
* Small fixups; better trace_in_no_trace tests
* Better doc
* crown in config.toml
* Fix tidy for real
* no sccache on rustc_wrapper
* document rustc overrides
* fixup of compiletest
* Make a few minor comment adjustments
* Fix a typo in python/servo/platform/base.py
Co-authored-by: Samson <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
* Proper test types
* Ignore tidy on crown/tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
http://www.robohornet.org gives a score of 101.36 on master,
and 102.68 with this PR. The latter is slightly better,
but probably within noise level.
So it looks like this PR does not affect DOM performance.
This is expected since `Box::new` is defined as:
```rust
impl<T> Box<T> {
#[inline(always)]
pub fn new(x: T) -> Box<T> {
box x
}
}
```
With inlining, it should compile to the same as box syntax.
In a later PR, DomRoot<T> will become a type alias of Root<Dom<T>>,
where Root<T> will be able to handle all the things that need to be
rooted that have a stable traceable address that doesn't move for the
whole lifetime of the root. Stay tuned.
This should make it somewhat easier to experiment with alternative
representations in the future. To reduce churn, this commit leaves the String
field public, though.
Also, this will allow us to use the default String type to represent the IDL
USVString type, which explicitly forbids unpaired surrogates, ans as such is
a better match to the Rust String type.
This trait is used to hold onto the downcast and upcast functions of all
castable IDL interfaces. A castable IDL interface is one which either derives
from or is derived by other interfaces.
The deriving relation is represented by implementations of marker trait
DerivedFrom<T: Castable> generated in InheritTypes.
/^[ ]*use dom::bindings::codegen::InheritTypes::.*(Base|Cast|Derived)/ {
/::[a-zA-Z]+(Base|Cast|Derived);/d
s/([{ ])[a-zA-Z]+(Base|Cast|Derived), /\1/g
s/([{ ])[a-zA-Z]+(Base|Cast|Derived), /\1/g
s/, [a-zA-Z]+(Base|Cast|Derived)([},])/\2/g
s/, [a-zA-Z]+(Base|Cast|Derived)([},])/\2/g
/\{([a-zA-Z]+(Base|Cast|Derived))?\};$/d
s/\{([a-zA-Z_]+)\};$/\1;/
}
s/([a-zA-Z]+)Cast::from_ref\(\&?\**([a-zA-Z_]+)(\.r\(\))?\)/\2.upcast::<\1>()/g
s/([a-zA-Z]+)Cast::from_ref\(\&?\**([a-zA-Z_]+)(\.[a-zA-Z_]+\(\))?\)/\2\3.upcast::<\1>()/g
s/\(([a-zA-Z]+)Cast::from_ref\)/\(Castable::upcast::<\1>\)/g
s/([a-zA-Z]+)Cast::from_root/Root::upcast::<\1>/g
s/([a-zA-Z]+)Cast::from_layout_js\(\&([a-zA-Z_.]+)\)/\2.upcast::<\1>()/g
s/([a-zA-Z]+)Cast::to_ref\(\&?\**([a-zA-Z_]+)(\.r\(\))?\)/\2.downcast::<\1>()/g
s/([a-zA-Z]+)Cast::to_ref\(\&?\**([a-zA-Z_]+)(\.[a-zA-Z_]+\(\))?\)/\2\3.downcast::<\1>()/g
s/\(([a-zA-Z]+)Cast::to_ref\)/\(Castable::downcast::<\1>\)/g
s/([a-zA-Z]+)Cast::to_root/Root::downcast::<\1>/g
s/([a-zA-Z]+)Cast::to_layout_js\(&?([a-zA-Z_.]+(\(\))?)\)/\2.downcast::<\1>()/g
s/\.is_document\(\)/.is::<Document>()/g
s/\.is_htmlanchorelement\(\)/.is::<HTMLAnchorElement>()/g
s/\.is_htmlappletelement\(\)/.is::<HTMLAppletElement>()/g
s/\.is_htmlareaelement\(\)/.is::<HTMLAreaElement>()/g
s/\.is_htmlbodyelement\(\)/.is::<HTMLBodyElement>()/g
s/\.is_htmlembedelement\(\)/.is::<HTMLEmbedElement>()/g
s/\.is_htmlfieldsetelement\(\)/.is::<HTMLFieldSetElement>()/g
s/\.is_htmlformelement\(\)/.is::<HTMLFormElement>()/g
s/\.is_htmlframesetelement\(\)/.is::<HTMLFrameSetElement>()/g
s/\.is_htmlhtmlelement\(\)/.is::<HTMLHtmlElement>()/g
s/\.is_htmlimageelement\(\)/.is::<HTMLImageElement>()/g
s/\.is_htmllegendelement\(\)/.is::<HTMLLegendElement>()/g
s/\.is_htmloptgroupelement\(\)/.is::<HTMLOptGroupElement>()/g
s/\.is_htmloptionelement\(\)/.is::<HTMLOptionElement>()/g
s/\.is_htmlscriptelement\(\)/.is::<HTMLScriptElement>()/g
s/\.is_htmltabledatacellelement\(\)/.is::<HTMLTableDataCellElement>()/g
s/\.is_htmltableheadercellelement\(\)/.is::<HTMLTableHeaderCellElement>()/g
s/\.is_htmltablerowelement\(\)/.is::<HTMLTableRowElement>()/g
s/\.is_htmltablesectionelement\(\)/.is::<HTMLTableSectionElement>()/g
s/\.is_htmltitleelement\(\)/.is::<HTMLTitleElement>()/g
Given codegen now generates the various TypeId enums, it seems pointless to
still have to write their respective values in every DOM struct inheriting from
Node just to set the initial IS_IN_DOC flag in Document and IN_ENABLED_STATE in
form controls.
