Add a new struct `LayoutBoxBase`, that will be used throughout the box
tree. The idea of this struct is that we have a place to consistently
store common layout information (style and node information) and also to
cache layout results such as content sizes (inline and maybe later box
sizes) and eventually layout results.
In addition to the addition of this struct,
`IndependentFormattingContext` is flattened slightly so that it directly
holds the contents of both replaced and non-replaced elements.
This is only added to independent formatting contexts, but will later be
added to all block containers as well.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
* Refactor computation of preferred aspect ratios
Computing min/max-content sizes required a ContainingBlock in order to
resolve the padding and border when determining the preferred aspect
ratio. However, all callers already knew the padding and border, so they
can compute the ratio themselves, and pass it directly instead of
the ContainingBlock.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* Put preferred aspect ratio into ConstraintSpace
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
In order to support size keywords in block layout, we may need to call
`inline_content_sizes()` in order to compute the min/max-content sizes.
But this required a mutable reference in order the update the cache,
and in various places we already had mutable references.
So this switches the cache into a RwLock to avoid needing mutable refs.
Note OnceCell wouldn't work because it's not thread-safe.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
To compute the min-content and max-content inline sizes of a replaced
element, we were only using the aspect ratio to transfer definite block
sizes resulting from clamping the preferred block size between the min
and max block sizes.
However, if the preferred block size is indefinite, then we weren't
transfering the min and max through the aspect ratio.
This patch adds a `SizeConstraint` enum that can represent these cases,
and a `ConstraintSpace` struct analogous to `IndefiniteContainingBlock`
but with no inline size, and a `SizeConstraint` block size.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This is the second flexbox caching change. It seeks to detect when a
relayout can be avoided in the case of a stretching flex item. This
heuristic can be combined, because currently we still do relayout
sometimes when we do not need to.
For instance currently we always relayout when a flex child is itself a
column flex. This only needs to happen when the grandchildren themselves
grow or shrink. That optimization is perhaps a lower priority as
`flex-grow: 0 / flex-shrink: 1` is the default behavior for flex.
Since this change means we more consistenly zero out the percentage part
of `calc` expressions when they have circular dependencies, this causes one
test to start failing (`/css/css-values/calc-min-height-block-1.html`).
This is related to w3c/csswg-drafts#10969, which is pending on further
discussion in the working group.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
The result of `inline_content_sizes()` may depend on the block size of
the containing block, so we were always recomputing in case we got
a different block size.
However, if no content has a vertical percentage or stretches vertically,
then we don't need to recompute: the result will be the same anyways.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
CAPMIN is the largest min-content contribution of the table captions.
In Servo, the standard way to compute min/max-content contributions is
`outer_inline_content_sizes()`, so just use that instead of reinventing
the wheel.
This also fixes cyclic percentages to resolve consistently with normal
block boxes.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* Use app unit in `ComputedValuesExt`
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: atbrakhi <atbrakhi@igalia.com>
* Some miscellaneous fixes
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
* remove redundant defination of `containing_block_inline_size`
Signed-off-by: atbrakhi <atbrakhi@igalia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: atbrakhi <atbrakhi@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
In particular, this takes into account that flex items may be stretched,
and if they have an aspect ratio, we ma6y need to convert the stretched
size through the ratio.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
We were only handling the aspect ratio of a replaced element when
computing its min/max-content contribution, but not when computing
the min/max-content size. Now both cases will take it into account.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
When computing the min-content or max-content size of an element we
need to ignore `inline-size`, `min-inline-size` and `max-inline-size`.
However, we should take the block-axis sizing properties into account.
That's because the contents could have percentages depending on them,
which can then affect their inline size via an aspect ratio.
Therefore, this patch adds `IndefiniteContainingBlock`, which is similar
to `ContainingBlock`, but it allows an indefinite inline-size. This
struct is then passed arround during intrinsic sizing.
More refinement will be needed in follow-up patches in order to fully
address the problem.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
For non-replaced formatting contexts, this method redirected directly to
`NonReplacedFormattingContextContents::inline_content_sizes()`, which
has the actual logic for the computation.
Thus it was bypassing the cache, which is handled in
`NonReplacedFormattingContext::inline_content_sizes()`.
Therefore, this patch redirects to the latter.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
We want to selectively enable right-to-left writing modes per layout
context. This change makes that possible by allowing access to
`writing-mode` though an interface that always returns the default
horizontal top-to-bottom (implicitly left-to-right) writing mode.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Rakhi Sharma <atbrakhi@igalia.com>
This change removes restrictions on using the column layout mode of
flexbox and adds an initial implementation of sizing for that flex
direction. There's a lot of missing pieces still, but in some cases this
does render column flexbox.
In particular, there are now two code paths for preferred widths
(intrinsic size) calcuation: one in the main axis (row) and one in
the cross axis (column) corresponding to the flex direciton with
horizontal writing modes.
In addition, `FlexItemBox::inline_content_sizes` is removed in favor of
making `sizing::outer_inline` /
`IndependentFormattingContext::outer_inline_content_sizes` generic
enough to handle using a different value for auto minimum sizes, which
flexbox needs.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This adds initial support for table captions. To do this, the idea of
the table wrapper becomes a bit more concrete. Even so, the wrapper is
still reponsible for allocating space for the grid's border and padding,
as those properties are specified on the wrapper and not grid in CSS.
In order to account for this weirdness of HTML/CSS captions and grid are
now laid out and placed with a negative offset in the table wrapper
content rect.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Instead of duplicating some of `NonReplacedContents` in `Contents`,
divide it into either replaced and non-replaced content, since this is
how the layout system processes `Contents` always. In addition, stop
using `TryInto` to match replaced or non-replaced contents, as it is
quite confusing to handle an `Err` as a success case.
This requires passing through information about whether or not the
element in question is replaced when checking to see if it's
transformable and transitively all functions that make decisions about
containing blocks. A new FragmentFlag is added to help track this -- it
will be set on both the replaced items BoxFragment container as well as
the Fragment for the replaced item itself.
Fixes#31806.
* Fix size of tables in flow layout
The contents of a table can make it bigger than what we would expect
from its 'width', 'min-width', 'height' and ' min-height' properties.
Also, 'width: auto' doesn't stretch it to fill the containing block.
We had to refactor the resolution of margins to happen after layout,
otherwise 'auto' margins wouldn't align correctly.
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
* Feedback
* Consistently use `containing_block_for_table` in table layout
* Update test result
---------
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
This implements a very naive row height allocation approach. It has just
enough to implement `vertical-align` in table cells. Rowspanned cells
get enough space for their content, with the extra space necessary being
allocated to the last row. There's still a lot missing here, including
proper distribution of row height to rowspanned cells.
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This change starts collecting the starting baseline set for fragments,
which is necessary for some layout modes (flex and tables, namely) as
well as being important for the implementation of `align-items`. In
addition, it converts baseline measurement to use `Au` everywhere.
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Shape text during InlineFormattingContext construction rather than doing
it twice during fragment tree construction. This is a step on the way
toward proper font fallback.
This also moves all `TextRun` related code into `text_run.rs` to try to
trim down the size of `inline.rs`.
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by
`[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate
data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes do not require tests because this should only have
performance impacts.
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox
is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the
way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they
will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
* layout: Add *very* basic support for table layout
This is the first step to proper table layout. It implements a naive
layout algorithm, notably only taking into account the preferred widths
of the first table row. Still, it causes some float tests to start
passing, so turn on the `layout.tables.enabled` preference for those
directories.
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* Address review comments
* Fix a crash with rowspan=0
* Turn on pref and update results for `/css/css-tables` and `/css/CSS2/tables`
---------
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* layout: Implement support for `line-height` and `vertical-align`
This is an initial implementation of proper `line-height` and
`vertical-align` support. While this change includes the bulk of the
work there are still many missing pieces for full support. In particular
some big missing things are:
- Flex containers do not properly compute their baselines. The idea is
to tackle this in a followup change. This causes various flex tests
to start failing because everything used to be top aligned.
- The implementation of the line-height quirks (only active in quirks
mode) are incomplete. While the quirk works in many cases, there are
still some cases where it is handled incorrectly. This requires more
redesign and refinement, better suited for a followup.
- Most of the features are CSS 3 such as precision control of the
baseline and first and last baselines are not implemented. This
change gets us close to CSS 2.x support.
While there are many new test passes with this change some tests are
starting to fail. An accounting of new failures:
Tests failing also in Layout 2013:
- /css/css2/positioning/toogle-abspos-on-relpos-inline-child.html (only passes in Chrome)
- /css/CSS2/fonts/font-applies-to-001.xht (potentially an issue with font size)
Invalid tests:
- /css/CSS2/visudet/inline-block-baseline-003.xht
- /css/CSS2/visudet/inline-block-baseline-004.xht
- These are are failing in all browsers. See https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1222151.
Missing table support:
- /_mozilla/mozilla/table_valign_middle.html
Missing `font-size-adjust` support :
- /css/css-fonts/font-size-adjust-zero-2.html (also failing in 2013)
Incomplete form field support :
- /html/rendering/widgets/the-select-element/option-add-label-quirks.html (label isn't rendered so button isn't the right size in quirks mode due to line height quirk)
Need support for calculating flexbox baseline:
- /css/css-flexbox/fieldset-baseline-alignment.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flex-inline.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flexbox-baseline-multi-line-horiz-001.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flexbox-baseline-single-item-001a.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flexbox-baseline-single-item-001b.html
Failing because we don't create anonymous inline boxes for text children of blocks:
- /css/CSS2/linebox/anonymous-inline-inherit-001.html
Passes locally (potentially related to fonts):
- /css/CSS2/css1/c414-flt-fit-004.xht
- /css/css-transforms/transform-input-017.html
- /html/obsolete/requirements-for-implementations/the-marquee-element-0/marquee-min-intrinsic-size.html
- /css/css-fonts/first-available-font-005.html
- /css/css-fonts/first-available-font-006.html
* Some cleanups after live review with @mukilan
Also update results.
This is the first part of constructing the box tree for table layout. No
layout is actually done and the construction of tables is now hidden
behind a flag (in order to not regress WPT). Notably, this does not
handle anonymous table part construction, when the DOM does not reflect
a fully-formed table. That's part two.
Progress toward #27459.
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Manish Goregaokar <manishsmail@gmail.com>
Absolutes with static insets need to be laid out at their ancestor
containing blocks, but their position is dependent on their parent's
layout. The static layout position is passed up the tree during hoisting
and ancestors each add their own offset to the position until it is
relative to the containing block that contains the absolute.
This is currently done with a closure and a fairly tricky "tree rank"
numbering system that needs to be threaded through the entire layout.
This change replaces that system.
Every time a child is laid out we create a positioning context to hold
any absolute children (this can be optimized away at a later time). At
each of these moments, we call a method to aggregate offsets to the
static insets of hoisted absolutes. This makes the logic easier to
follow and will also allow implementing this behavior for inline-blocks,
which was impossible with the old system.
This is a simple code organization change with no behavior change with
the idea of making Layout 2020 easier to understand by new folks to the
project. The idea is that we will have a cleaner separation between the
different parts of layout ie one directory for the fragment tree and one
(currently multiple) directory for the box tree.
During layout it is often useful, for various specification reasons, to
know if an element is the `<body>` element of an `<html>` element root. There
are a couple places where a brittle heuristic is used to detect `<body>`
elements. This information is going to be even more important to
properly handle `<html>` elements that inherit their overflow property from
their `<body>` children.
Implementing this properly requires updating the DOM wrapper interface.
This check does reach up to the parent of thread-safe nodes, but this is
essentially the same kind of operation that `parent_style()` does, so is
ostensibly safe.
This change should not change any behavior and is just a preparation
step for properly handle `<body>` overflow.
