ComputedValues is now ServoComputedValues
This is the first part of #10185. More to follow. I have built this locally with both servo and geckolib without errors; let's see if it succeeds on all platforms as well.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10210)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
This is the first part of #10185. More to follow. I have built this locally with both servo and geckolib without errors; let's see if it succeeds on all platforms as well.
speculation code.
The old code tried to do the speculation as a single bottom-up pass
after intrinsic inline-size calculation, which was unable to handle
cases like this:
<div>
<div style="float: left">Foo</div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="overflow: hidden">Bar</div>
</div>
No single bottom-up pass could possibly handle this case, because the
inline-size of the float flowing out of the "Foo" block could never make
it down to the "Bar" block, where it is needed for speculation.
On the pages I tried, this regresses layout performance by 1%-2%.
I first noticed this breaking some pages, like the Google SERPs, several
months ago.
`memmove` was showing up high in the profile when concatenating and
shorting display lists. This change drastically reduces the `memmove`
cost in exchange for some minor additional allocation cost.
Instead of producing a tree of stacking contexts, display list
generation now produces a flat list of display items and a tree of
stacking contexts. This will eventually allow display list construction
to produce and modify WebRender vertex buffers directly, removing the
overhead of display list conversion. This change also moves
layerization of the display list to the paint thread, since it isn't
currently useful for WebRender.
To accomplish this, display list generation now takes three passes of
the flow tree:
1. Calculation of absolute positions.
2. Collection of a tree of stacking contexts.
3. Creation of a list of display items.
After collection of display items, they are sorted based upon the index
of their parent stacking contexts and their position in CSS 2.1
Appendeix E stacking order.
This is a big change, but it actually simplifies display list generation.
More aggressively remove Fragment RestyleDamage
Now clean up damage on all fragments that belong to a Flow. This ensures
that damage does not re-propagate up to the parent Flow from the
Fragments. It also means that the flow tree dump should show a more
accurate picture of the state of the flow tree.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/9008)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
We do a few things-here:
* Hoist non-layout-dependent fields in SharedLayoutData and LocalLayoutData into style/.
* Hoist parts of css/matching.rs into style/.
* Hoist parts of layout/animation.rs into style/animation.rs.
* Remove the duplicated-but-slightly-different definition of OpaqueNode.
Now clean up damage on all fragments that belong to a Flow. This ensures
that damage does not re-propagate up to the parent Flow from the
Fragments. It also means that the flow tree dump should show a more
accurate picture of the state of the flow tree.
Use the PrintTree utility to improve the readability of flow tree
dumps. Blocks and fragments are now split over two dump levels, because
otherwise they are impenetrable. Also start printing the restyle damage of
fragments.
This flag is no longer necessary, because stacking contexts can now
create layers lazily for content that needs to be stacked above a
layer. This should reduce the number of layers on pages, hopefully
reducing overdraw.
Flows never care about their own text-align, only the text-align of
their parent; change the text-align flags to account for that. Make the
"align descendants" rule use the flags instead of the current node's style.
Fixes#7301.
Simplify stacking context creation
Have Fragment::create_stacking_context understand which stacking
contexts need layers and which do not. This simplifies the way it is
called and eliminates a bunch of code.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/7804)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Have Fragment::create_stacking_context understand which stacking
contexts need layers and which do not. This simplifies the way it is
called and eliminates a bunch of code.
each iframe.
The old code that attempted to do this during layout wasn't able to work
for multiple reasons: it couldn't know where the iframe was going to be
on the page (because of nested iframes), and at the time it was building
the display list for a fragment it couldn't know where that fragment was
going to be in page coordinates.
This patch rewrites that code so that both the sizes and positions of
iframes are determined by the compositor. Layout layerizes all iframes
and marks the iframe layers with the appropriate pipeline and subpage
IDs so that the compositor can place them correctly. This approach is
similar in spirit to Gecko's `RefLayer` infrastructure. The logic that
determines when it is time to take the screenshot for reftests has been
significantly revamped to deal with this change in delegation of
responsibility.
Additionally, this code removes the infrastructure that sends layout
data back to the layout task to be destroyed, since it is now all
thread-safe and can be destroyed on the script task.
The failing tests now fail because of a pre-existing bug related to
intrinsic heights and borders on inline replaced elements. They happened
to pass before because we never rendered the iframes at all, which meant
they never had a chance to draw the red border the tests expect to not
render!
Closes#7377.
Currently pseudo-elements, like the fragments created for ::before and
::after, with layers will have the same LayerId as the body of their
owning fragments. Instead all LayerIds should be unique.
Fixes#2010.
