This implements fragment merging, in order to incrementally reflow linebroken
text. This makes the `whitespace_pre.html` reftest pass with incremental reflow
turned on with `-i`.
match L. David Baron's work-in-progress specification.
http://dbaron.org/css/intrinsic/
Column spans are not yet supported.
This effectively adds support for percentage widths, and it also fixes
many bugs, improving the layout of Google and Wikipedia.
matching, and use it for `<input size>` and `<td width>`.
This implements a general framework for legacy presentational attributes
to the DOM and style calculation, so that adding more of them later will
be straightforward.
Instead of taking margin size into account twice when positioning
layers, just rely on the absolute position calculated during display
list construction.
a separate `ClipDisplayItem`.
We push down clipping areas during absolute position calculation. This
makes display items into a flat list, improving cache locality. It
dramatically simplifies the code all around.
Because we need to push down clip rects even for absolutely-positioned
children of non-absolutely-positioned flows, this patch alters the
parallel traversal to compute absolute positions for
absolutely-positioned children at the same time it computes absolute
positions for other children. This doesn't seem to break anything either
in theory (since the overall order remains correct) or in practice. It
simplifies the parallel traversal code quite a bit.
See the relevant Gecko bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615734
Instead of taking margin size into account twice when positioning
layers, just rely on the absolute position calculated during display
list construction.
This makes layout more idempotent, which is important for incremental
layout.
Also converts `is_root` to a set of flags and fixes a `TODO` concerning
percentage inline heights of images.
r? @glennw
writing it to a temporary location and overwriting it.
This makes layout more idempotent, which is important for incremental
layout.
Also converts `is_root` to a set of flags and fixes a `TODO` concerning
percentage inline heights of images.
This patch puts in the initial framework for incremental reflow. Nodes' styles
are no longer recalculated unless the node has changed.
I've been hacking on the general problem of incremental reflow for the past
couple weeks, and I've yet to get a full implementation that actually passes all
the reftests + wikipedia + cnn. Therefore, I'm going to try to land the different
parts of it one by one.
This patch only does incremental style recalc, without incremental flow
construction, inline-size bubbling, reflow, or display lists. Those will be coming
in that order as I finish them.
At least with this strategy, I can land a working version of incremental reflow,
even if not yet complete.
r? @pcwalton
absolutely-positioned elements declared with `display: inline`.
Although the computed `display` property of elements with `position:
absolute` is `block`, `position: absolute; display: inline` can still
behave differently from `position: absolute; display: block`. This is
because the hypothetical box for `position: absolute` can be at the
position it would have been if it had `display: inline`. CSS 2.1 §
10.3.7 describes this case in a parenthetical:
"The static-position containing block is the containing block of a
hypothetical box that would have been the first box of the element if
its specified 'position' value had been 'static' and its specified
'float' had been 'none'. (Note that due to the rules in section 9.7 this
hypothetical calculation might require also assuming a different
computed value for 'display'.)"
To handle this, I had to change both style computation and layout. For
the former, I added an internal property
`-servo-display-for-hypothetical-box`, which stores the `display` value
supplied by the author, before the computed value is calculated. Flow
construction now uses this value.
As for layout, implementing the proper behavior is tricky because the
position of an inline fragment in the inline direction cannot be
determined until height assignment, which is a parallelism hazard
because in parallel layout widths are computed before heights. However,
in this particular case we can avoid the parallelism hazard because the
inline direction of a hypothetical box only affects the layout if an
absolutely-positioned element is unconstrained in the inline direction.
Therefore, we can just lay out such absolutely-positioned elements with
a bogus inline position and fix it up once the true inline position of
the hypothetical box is computed. The name for this fix-up process is
"late computation of inline position" (and the corresponding fix-up for
the block position is called "late computation of block position").
This improves the header on /r/rust.
* Enabled acid2 on mac + linux. Updated the reference image. The only difference from the
real acid2 now is the paint order and a 1 pixel horizontal offset on the nose.
* Change line-height to be calculated correctly.
* Apply enclosing element style to text fragments.
construction.
The iteration was incorrect here. Although it accidentally worked
before, it will cause problems when we have incremental style
recalculation.
The `after_block_iteration` reftest will become interesting once we have
incremental style recalc.
Also fixes calculation of background-position percentages:
Rather than multiplying the container size by a percent and aligning the top
left of the image at the resulting width, we also need to subtract a
corresponding percent of the image size, per
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css2/colors.html#propdef-background-position
"A value pair of '100% 100%' places the lower right corner of the image in the
lower right corner of the padding box. With a value pair of '14% 84%', the
point 14% across and 84% down the image is to be placed at the point 14%
across and 84% down the padding box."
This still needs a lot of work, but it covers the basic
cases and improves wikipedia while passing all existing tests.
Tweak reftest to deal with linux/travis black background.
This fixes the visual artifacts seen at the top of wikipedia pages by:
- Setting clipping rect to avoid images going outside their bounds.
- Handling case of background-position being >= 100% such that wrapping is required.
However, the gradient is not currently visible on wikipedia. This relies on bug #1997 being fixed.
