* Use 2024 style edition
Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
* Reformat all code
Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
---------
Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
The specification doesn't say how to deal with percentages when
determining the minimum and maximum size of a table grid, so follow the
approach that Chromium uses.
Essentially, figure out the "missing" percentage from the non-percentage
columns and then use that to work backwards to fine the size of the
percentage ones.
This change is larger than one might expect, because this percentage
approach shouldn't happen for tables that are descendants of a flex,
grid or table container (except when there is an interceding absolute).
We have to pass this information down when building the box tree. This
will also make it easier to improve propagated text decorations in the
future.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
There were two kinds of layout tracing controlled by the same debugging
option:
- modern layout: Functionality that dumped a JSON serialization of the
layout tree before and after layout.
- legacy layout: A scope based tracing that reported the process of
layout in a structured way.
I don't think anyone working on layout is using either of these two
features. For modern layout requiring data structure to implement
`serde` serialization is incredibly inconvenient and also generates a
lot of extra code.
We also have a more modern tracing functionality based on perfetto that
we have started to use for layout and IMO it's actually being used and
more robust.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
It used to be an `AuOrAuto`, turning it into a `SizeConstraint` allows
passing the information about the min and max constraints when the
containing block doesn't have a definite block size.
This will be useful for table layout.
Note that in most cases we were already constructing the containing
block from a `SizeConstraint`, but we were calling `to_auto_or()` to
turn it into an `AuOrAuto`.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This might make caching these values a bit easier in the future.
Correcting the visibility of `ContainingBlock` also exposed some new
rustc and clippy warnings that are fixed here.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* Obey min and max properties when computing main size of column flex
When laying out a column flex container with an auto preferred main size,
we were resolving the used main size to the intrinsic max-content size.
However, we weren't clamping this amount between the min and max sizes.
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* Improve performance of flex column layouts by caching
We were already using a cache for layout_for_block_content_size(), but
we were only storing the intrinsic block size. Thus when laying out the
flex items for real, we would perform new layouts, triggering an
exponential complexity in case of nested flexboxes.
Now we cache the entire layout result so that we can avoid doing the
work again.
This improves the results of flexbox-deeply-nested-column-flow.html
(a Blink perf test) from ~40 runs/second to ~500 runs/second on my PC.
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
This is the second flexbox caching change. It seeks to detect when a
relayout can be avoided in the case of a stretching flex item. This
heuristic can be combined, because currently we still do relayout
sometimes when we do not need to.
For instance currently we always relayout when a flex child is itself a
column flex. This only needs to happen when the grandchildren themselves
grow or shrink. That optimization is perhaps a lower priority as
`flex-grow: 0 / flex-shrink: 1` is the default behavior for flex.
Since this change means we more consistenly zero out the percentage part
of `calc` expressions when they have circular dependencies, this causes one
test to start failing (`/css/css-values/calc-min-height-block-1.html`).
This is related to w3c/csswg-drafts#10969, which is pending on further
discussion in the working group.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This is the first part of caching intermediary layout during flexbox
layout. A later change will try to reuse these layouts, when possible,
for actual item layout and re-layout due to stretching.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This change removes the `effective_writing_mode` concept and tries to
properly implement right-to-left layout support for all non-inline
writing modes. In general, what needs to happen is that rectangles
need to be converted to physical rectangles using the containing block.
A right-to-left rectangle's inline start is on the right physical side
of the containing block. Likewise a positive inline offset in
right-to-left text is a negative physical one.
The implementation here is pretty good for most layout modes, but floats
are still a bit in process. Currently, floats are processed in the
logical layout of the block container, but there still might be issues
with float interaction with mixed RTL and LTR.
While this does move us closer to supporting vertical writing modes,
this is still unsupported.
New failures:
- Vertical writing mode not supported:
- `/css/CSS2/floats/floats-placement-vertical-001b.xht`
- `/css/CSS2/floats/floats-placement-vertical-001c.xht`
- Absolutes inlines should avoid floats (#33323)
- `/css/css-position/position-absolute-dynamic-static-position-floats-004.html`
- No support for grid
- `/css/css-align/self-alignment/self-align-safe-unsafe-grid-003.html`
- `/css/css-position/static-position/inline-level-absolute-in-block-level-context-009.html`
- `/css/css-position/static-position/inline-level-absolute-in-block-level-context-010.html`
- Cannot reproduce these locally on any platform. Very mysterious:
- `/css/css-tables/row-group-margin-border-padding.html`
- `/css/css-tables/row-margin-border-padding.html`
- Exposes bugs we have related to hanging whitespace in preserved
whitespace inlines:
- `/css/css-text/white-space/trailing-space-and-text-alignment-rtl-003.html`
- `/css/css-text/white-space/white-space-pre-wrap-trailing-spaces-023.html`
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Rakhi Sharma <atbrakhi@igalia.com>
This implements the requirements outlined in the [flexbox specification]
about how to position absolute children of flex containers. We must
establish a static position rectangle (to use if all insets are auto)
and also align the child into that rectangle.
[flebox specification]: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#abspos-items
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
When a baseline is orthogonal to the main flexbox axis, it should not
take part in baseline alignment. This change does that for column flex.
While there is no support for vertical writing modes, this change is
made to be as writing mode-agnostic as possible.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This change adds an expensive layout for the determination of minimum
automatic size and flex basis in process of flexbox layout. Currently,
the layout is not cached, so may be performed up to 2 more times than
necessary.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
