into account only once.
There were two bugs here: (1) relative position applied to
scanned/unscanned text fragments independently of the container element
that applied that relative position, causing double-counting; (2)
relative position applied to inline block fragments independently of the
wrapped block itself, causing double-counting.
This commit also removes the `cascade_anonymous` function and the
related `Fragment` constructor. They were unused, and their
functionality has been replaced by the `modify_style_for_*` series of
functions.
Closes#7067.
layout: Rewrite whitespace stripping.
This patch makes Servo unconditionally strip whitespace before text run
scanning (assuming that the `white-space` property allows it). Whitespace
stripping during reflow is now only used for handling whitespace at the ends of
lines; reflow now never attempts to handle ignorable whitespace.
Many CSS tests pass now. There are some new failures, however.
The following reference tests now fail due to a pre-existing bug whereby
whitespace is used to calculate the position of inline hypothetical boxes for
elements with `display: inline; position: absolute`:
* `absolute-replaced-height-036.htm`
* `vertical-align-sub-001.htm`
* `vertical-align-super-001.htm`
The following reference tests fail due to a pre-existing bug whereby we don't
handle `font-size: 0` properly in inline reflow:
* `font-size-zero-1.htm`
* `font-size-zero-2.htm`
The following reference test fails due to the fact that it relied on our
incorrect insertion of whitespace to make room for the black background:
* `inline-formatting-context-007.htm`
r? @mbrubeck
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/7024)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
This patch makes Servo unconditionally strip whitespace before text run
scanning (assuming that the `white-space` property allows it). Whitespace
stripping during reflow is now only used for handling whitespace at the ends of
lines; reflow now never attempts to handle ignorable whitespace.
Many CSS tests pass now. There are some new failures, however.
The following reference tests now fail due to a pre-existing bug whereby
whitespace is used to calculate the position of inline hypothetical boxes for
elements with `display: inline; position: absolute`:
* `absolute-replaced-height-036.htm`
* `vertical-align-sub-001.htm`
* `vertical-align-super-001.htm`
The following reference tests fail due to a pre-existing bug whereby we don't
handle `font-size: 0` properly in inline reflow:
* `font-size-zero-1.htm`
* `font-size-zero-2.htm`
The following reference test fails due to the fact that it relied on our
incorrect insertion of whitespace to make room for the black background:
* `inline-formatting-context-007.htm`
Known issues:
* Display list optimization can sometimes optimize out elements that
should be shown. This affects the Enyo demo.
* The `overflow: scroll` container doesn't clip the inner layer properly
when borders, border radius, etc. are present.
* `overflow-x: scroll` and `overflow-y: scroll` don't work individually;
elements are scrolled all at once.
* Scrolling only works on absolutely-positioned elements.
At this point the only thing it does is to try to avoid adding display
items that are outside the root scrollable area, which is both wrong
(since it's incompatible with having scrollable areas outside the root)
and is useless (because we have displayports now).
at the last known good split point, and use it for `white-space:
nowrap`.
Fixes overflowing tables on Wikipedia.
This infrastructure should form the basis of our fix for inline layout
of fragments that don't themselves constitute valid split points. That
will require some more work, however.
The failing `float-applies-to-*` CSS 2.1 tests never really should have
been passing in the first place; they depend on floats inside
fixed-layout tables working properly, which they don't.
Closes#6078.
Closes#6709.
Closes#6858.
layout: Take inline margins into account when determining the intrinsic sizes of fragments.
Avoids a needless wrapped line in the repository name on GitHub.
r? @mbrubeck
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/7011)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Use Box<str> instead of Box<String> for UnscannedTextFragmentInfo
This removes an extraneous layer of indirection, without increasing the size of the `SpecificFragmentInfo` enum (because `Box<str>` is a fat pointer, which is the same size as the `FlowRef` trait object that is already stored in `InlineAbsoluteHypotheticalFragmentInfo`)
r? @pcwalton
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/7014)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
This removes an extraneous layer of indirection, without increasing the size
of the `SpecificFragmentInfo` enum (because `Box<str>` is a fat pointer, which
is the same size as the `FlowRef` trait object that is already stored in
`InlineAbsoluteHypotheticalFragmentInfo`)
layout: When repairing styles for incremental reflow, only repair styles of nodes that represent the dirty node, *including its pseudo-element*.
r? @mbrubeck
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6940)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
styles of nodes that represent the dirty node, *including its
pseudo-element*.
Fixes lots more jumpiness.
A manual test, `inline-pseudo-repair-jumpiness.html`, has been added. I
was unable to automate it, so I will file a followup issue on that.
construct: When repairing styles for incremental reflow, only repair styles of nodes that represent the dirty node.
Fixes jumpiness on many pages; e.g. the WPT results pages.
For some reason, this would not reproduce with an automated test.
r? @mbrubeck
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6938)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
