layout: When repairing styles for incremental reflow, only repair styles of nodes that represent the dirty node, *including its pseudo-element*.
r? @mbrubeck
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6940)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
layout: Don't use the block container inline size as the initial computed table inline size.
Makes google.com fully centered.
r? @glennw
cc @SimonSapin
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6947)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
styles of nodes that represent the dirty node, *including its
pseudo-element*.
Fixes lots more jumpiness.
A manual test, `inline-pseudo-repair-jumpiness.html`, has been added. I
was unable to automate it, so I will file a followup issue on that.
construct: When repairing styles for incremental reflow, only repair styles of nodes that represent the dirty node.
Fixes jumpiness on many pages; e.g. the WPT results pages.
For some reason, this would not reproduce with an automated test.
r? @mbrubeck
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6938)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Start reporting memory usage for Window and all nodes in all DOM tree…
…s for frame treese in script tasks.
This underreports by a significant amount, since only Document, Window and CharacterData (ie. text) nodes are fully represented. That being said, every HTML element in the tree is measured, but only counted as a Node. It's easy to improve this, it just requires adding the appropriate HeapSizeOf derives and increasing the granularity of `measure_memory_for_eventtarget`. google.com shows a dom-tree value of 0.24 MB for me at the moment.
r? @nnethercote
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6874)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
The three tests that are marked as failures are because they use offsetWidth as a dummy to force a layout flush. Now that these exist, they expose an unrelated bug with reflow.
styles of nodes that represent the dirty node.
Fixes jumpiness on many pages; e.g. the WPT results pages.
For some reason, this would not reproduce with an automated test.
Lock and flush stdout in Window#alert.
We use alert() to communicate test results to wptrunner. Unfortunately,
sometimes the alert output is interleaved with other output on stdout,
causing wptrunner to classify the test result as a timeout. I hope this will
avoid that scenario.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6917)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
We use alert() to communicate test results to wptrunner. Unfortunately,
sometimes the alert output is interleaved with other output on stdout,
causing wptrunner to classify the test result as a timeout. I hope this will
avoid that scenario.
It's not possible to correctly determine during the css cascade whether the container height
is explicitly specified. Additionally, the spec https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/visudet.html#the-height-property
says this should affect the *used* height, rather than the computed height.
This significantly improves the layout in #6643.
