This also changes their ToCss impl to use SequenceWriter instead of
checking has_value manually.
SpecifiedValueInfo for those types are also implemented in this patch.
Bug: 1434130
Reviewed-by: emilio
MozReview-Commit-ID: 23h2VWS417H
System font keywords are not a valid value for those properties.
The newly-added #[css(skip)] would be reused by deriving algorithm of
SpecifiedValueInfo to skip them as well.
Bug: 1434130
Reviewed-by: emilio
MozReview-Commit-ID: EmnhkaA9RR5
Most of types just derive it using proc_macro directly. Some of value
types need manual impl.
In my current plan, this new trait will be used in bug 1434130 to expose
values as well.
Bug: 1455576
Reviewed-by: emilio
MozReview-Commit-ID: LI7fy45VkRw
If I had to write that again I would've killed myself :).
This is still not perfect, and the system font code is still quite a mess, but
well, little steps.
Bug: 1455358
Reviewed-by: xidorn
MozReview-Commit-ID: BmrZlCSejo7
These won't "just work", pending changes from bug 1436048 to use a floating
point representation for those.
Bug: 1454883
Reviewed-by: xidorn
MozReview-Commit-ID: Bi5iTdFreMA
Implement a URL-generic type for ListStyleImage
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
This should fix the following two "expected to fail" tests described in https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/18015:
- getComputedStyle(elem) for url() listStyleImage uses the resolved URL
and elem.style uses the original URL
- getComputedStyle(elem) for url() listStyle uses the resolved URL
and elem.style uses the original URL
I updated the test failure expectations by removing the corresponding `.ini` file.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#18015 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20482)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
This should fix the following two "expected to fail" tests:
- getComputedStyle(elem) for url() listStyleImage uses the resolved URL
and elem.style uses the original URL
- getComputedStyle(elem) for url() listStyle uses the resolved URL
and elem.style uses the original URL
