get_image_pixels() implementation for video element
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Implements the webgl's get_image_pixels() call for video element
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix#21995 (GitHub issue number if applicable)
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24233)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Switch to the new Cargo.lock format
The way the Cargo.lock file is encoded on stable Rust is quite unfriendly
to Git when multiple pull requests change that file at the same time,
how version numbers are everywhere and all checksums are in the same place
often produces merge conflicts for nothing.
This patch brings the new Cargo.lock format to Servo.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/63579
The main caveat is that for now, cargo-tree and similar tools won't work
anymore.
I checked that the duplicate crate tidy check still does its job though.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24334)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Add missing package dependency for Arch Linux in README
Without LLVM installed you get: "Error: Can't find llvm-objdump" when
running ./mach build --dev. LLVM is not installed automatically because it's not a dependency for any of the other dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Jakob Sinclair <sinclair.jakob@mailbox.org>
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
- [X] These changes do not require tests because only the README.md file was updated
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24361)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
The way the Cargo.lock file is encoded on stable Rust is quite unfriendly
to Git when multiple pull requests change that file at the same time,
how version numbers are everywhere and all checksums are in the same place
often produces merge conflicts for nothing.
This patch brings the new Cargo.lock format to Servo.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/63579
The main caveat is that for now, cargo-tree and similar tools won't work
anymore.
I checked that the duplicate crate tidy check still does its job though.
The way the Cargo.lock file is encoded on stable Rust is quite unfriendly
to Git when multiple pull requests change that file at the same time,
how version numbers are everywhere and all checksums are in the same place
often produces merge conflicts for nothing.
This patch brings the new Cargo.lock format to Servo.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/63579
The main caveat is that for now, cargo-tree and similar tools won't work
anymore.
I checked that the duplicate crate tidy check still does its job though.
Sync WPT with upstream (03-10-2019)
Automated downstream sync of changes from upstream as of 03-10-2019.
[no-wpt-sync]
r? @servo-wpt-sync
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24358)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Use unfiltered response body when replicating body of cached responses.
The amount of time it took me to track this down makes me wonder if there would be a better way of representing response bodies and filtered responses.
---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#24350
- [ ] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24356)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Use correct OpenSSL arch in UWP builds.
This is a followup from #24257. I forgot to run the UWP WACK tests after making my changes, or I would have noticed that the wrong DLLs were being selected for UWP builds.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24352)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Without LLVM installed you get: "Error: Can't find llvm-objdump" when
running ./mach build --dev
Signed-off-by: Jakob Sinclair <sinclair.jakob@mailbox.org>
Remove [PrimaryGlobal]
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#24336
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24354)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Fix intermittent macOS reftest failures
CTCreateFontWithName intermittently returns the wrong font for a given postscript name. These changes rely on obtaining a font descriptor, using it to get the path to the actual font file on disk, getting the bytes that make up the font, and using Core Graphics to create a font handle and obtaining the Core Graphics font from the CGFont reference. This is the same strategy that font-kit uses.
---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#23290
- [x] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24347)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Support `--features vslatestinstalled`
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Matches https://github.com/servo/rust-mozjs/pull/477.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#24331
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24344)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Migrate to new constructor operation syntax
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Marking everything as `[Throws]` for simplicity sake (and this matches the previous codegen behavior), but we'll want to unmark some of them as not everything throws.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#24157
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24345)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
XMLHttpRequest.responseXML returns null when a network error occurs
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#24285 (GitHub issue number if applicable)
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because tests ___
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24342)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Update to UWP compatible OpenSSL build.
This uses OpenSSL binaries built from https://github.com/servo/openssl-windows-build which yield no more WACK violations.
---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#24138
- [x] These changes do not require tests because no CI for WACK or windows yet.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24257)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Isolate UWP builds from external gstreamers
Fixes https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/24327
This further seals the UWP build from the non-cross regular environment and makes pkg-config look at the UWP package.
This makes sure external gstreamer stuff doesn't sneak in. We already kinda do this by setting the LIB environment variable, but PKG_CONFIG_PATH also sneaks in and causes problems. Thing is, it turns out that the pkgconfig in gstreamer-uwp isn't enough for a full servo build, since we don't package gstreamer-webrtc, and the gstreamer-webrtc crate requires it to be around, even if we won't end up loading the library at runtime. Stuff has succeeded so far because people have gstreamer installations whose PKG_CONFIG_PATH is pulled in, despite us using a different set of DLLs, which somehow works but sometimes doesn't (I still don't know why).
I've added a fake gstreamer-webrtc-1.0.pc file to both targets in the gstreamer-uwp package with the following contents. It doesn't do anything the other pc files don't, so it doesn't end up pulling in additional libraries, it just exists to convince pkgconfig that we *have* this library (even though we don't), so that the build may succeed (we'll fail at runtime when we try to open WebRTC connections, but those are disabled anyway).
<details>
```pkgconfig
prefix=c:/gstreamer/1.0/arm64.uwp-release
exec_prefix=${prefix}
libdir=${prefix}/lib
includedir=${prefix}/include/gstreamer-1.0
datarootdir=${prefix}/share
datadir=${datarootdir}
girdir=${datadir}/gir-1.0
typelibdir=${libdir}/girepository-1.0
Name: Fake GStreamer WebRTC library
Description: Hacky stand-in for gstreamer-webrtc, does nothing but stops the Rust gstreamer-webrtc crate from failing during build
Requires: gstreamer-1.0 gstreamer-base-1.0
Version: 1.16.0
Libs: -L${libdir}
Cflags: -I${includedir}
```
</details>
r? @jdm
Perhaps don't merge yet, I can't test this until tomorrow (and ideally would like to test this from scratch tomorrow evening)
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24343)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Integrates media track selection
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Updates audio/video track selection to use the servo media player track selection methods.
This is technically only a partial fix because only one audio track can be set at a time and servo_media needs to be updated to handle multiple audio tracks. Once/if this goes through I can file follow up issue for that.
I believe this also inadvertently covers at least some of #22912
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#22799 (GitHub issue number if applicable)
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [x] These changes do not require tests because - This probably should have a test case. But I am not aware of a way, at least not from servo, to test that the actual audio or video changed in the underlying player or on screen.
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24265)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
