Most of types just derive it using proc_macro directly. Some of value
types need manual impl.
In my current plan, this new trait will be used in bug 1434130 to expose
values as well.
Bug: 1455576
Reviewed-by: emilio
MozReview-Commit-ID: LI7fy45VkRw
This more concrete wrapper type can write a prefix the very first time something
is written to it. This allows removing plenty of useless monomorphisations caused
by the former W/SequenceWriter<W> pair of types.
Servo currently uses `heapsize`, but Stylo/Gecko use `malloc_size_of`.
`malloc_size_of` is better -- it handles various cases that `heapsize` does not
-- so this patch changes Servo to use `malloc_size_of`.
This patch makes the following changes to the `malloc_size_of` crate.
- Adds `MallocSizeOf` trait implementations for numerous types, some built-in
(e.g. `VecDeque`), some external and Servo-only (e.g. `string_cache`).
- Makes `enclosing_size_of_op` optional, because vanilla jemalloc doesn't
support that operation.
- For `HashSet`/`HashMap`, falls back to a computed estimate when
`enclosing_size_of_op` isn't available.
- Adds an extern "C" `malloc_size_of` function that does the actual heap
measurement; this is based on the same functions from the `heapsize` crate.
This patch makes the following changes elsewhere.
- Converts all the uses of `heapsize` to instead use `malloc_size_of`.
- Disables the "heapsize"/"heap_size" feature for the external crates that
provide it.
- Removes the `HeapSizeOf` implementation from `hashglobe`.
- Adds `ignore` annotations to a few `Rc`/`Arc`, because `malloc_size_of`
doesn't derive those types, unlike `heapsize`.
This patch replaces the handwritten MallocSizeOf implementation for
PropertyDeclaration with a derived one, which gives much more thorough
measurement.
This requires (a) deriving MallocSizeOf for a *lot* of additional types (most
of which already have `derive(HeapSizeOf)` in Servo builds), and (b)
implementing MallocSizeOf for a few more types in the `malloc_size_of` crate.
These changes would significantly improve the reporting coverage for gmail if
it weren't for the fact that SpecifiedUrl isn't measured due to a lack of
clarity about its fields; that can be fixed as a follow-up once bug 1397971 has
landed.
