Do not use lookup tables for put_image_data
Fixes#9599
"This is the first Rust code I have ever written" (and also my first time writing real browser code, it's been quite the learning experience).
Some questions:
> For really fast CPU results, use integer SIMD instructions to handle more than one pixel at a time.
This was out of the scope of #9599, right? I started looking into doing that, but it seems to be a lot more work than the `E-easy` label would suggest. [`std::simd`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.0.0/std/simd/index.html) is marked as "unstable", is that a blocker?
> 128 can be added before dividing to round more accurately.
@michaelwu, what did you mean by that?
Also, the #9599 is `Do not use lookup tables for {Get,Put}ImageData operations`, but we only use lookup tables for the `Put`, not the `Get`, right?
Sorry for all the noobish questions.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="40" alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/9911)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
implements data-url fetching
Fixes#10165
jdm mentioned of decoupling the, payload loading mechanism to data_loader.rs. So accordingly a `decoder` method has been added to data_loader.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10272)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Removed panicking when frame or pipeline lookup fails.
Removed the methods `pipeline(id)`, `pipeline_mut(id)`, `frame(id)` and `frame_mut(id)` from constellation, which panicked when the table lookup failed.
The panics were causing race conditions, e.g. visiting google.com and resizing the page would cause a panic, most likely due to an iframe being added and removed, with the `DOMLoad` event arriving after the iframe had been removed, causing a panic.
This patch fixes#10017 and #8769 (although in non-webrender builds there's now a different panic, see https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/10017#issuecomment-198160200).
There are a few `TODO` items in the initial commit, for cases where it's not completely obvious what to do in the case of failure.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10082)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Update webrender to master
I'll rebase #10224 against it.
Sorry for the blocking of #10224, I expected it to be reviewed way sooner, my fault for landing breaking changes.
r? @nox or @pcwalton
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10302)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Include square brackets for IPv6 addresses in Document::domain.
The specification changed out from under us.
It's unfortunately impossible to write a test for this right now.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10287)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Implement ::selection pseudo-element
It only supports `color` and `background`, for now, but it shouldn't be hard to add more properties (like text-shadow).
r? @mbrubeck
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10252)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Replace any uses of .send().unwrap() by .send().unwrap_or_else().
This is part of the effort to harden the constellation (#10124), in this case against panics caused by channel send.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10242)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Reduce size of layout::fragment::Fragment struct
This reduces the size of the SpecificFragmentInfo enum from 48 to 24.
r? @pcwalton
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10255)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
