* Add parser support for 3d transforms.
* Change ComputedMatrix to a representation that suits interpolation.
* Switch stacking contexts to use 4x4 matrices.
The transforms themselves are still converted to 2d and handled by azure for now, but this is a small standalone part that can be landed now to make it easier to review.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6214)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
This reverts commit 945adabd48.
The CSS Working Group resolved to drop this value from the spec:
http://log.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/2015-05-20/#e555680
The group was unable to come up with even a theoretical use case.
Gecko only implemented this value for completeness.
Other browsers vendors have clearly expressed they have no interest
in implementing this.
* Add parser support for 3d transforms.
* Change ComputedMatrix to a representation that suits interpolation.
* Switch stacking contexts to use 4x4 matrices.
The transforms themselves are still converted to 2d and handled by azure for now, but this is a small standalone part that can be landed now to make it easier to review.
This property determines the background positioning area, that is the position of
the origin of an image specified using the 'background-image' CSS property.
'background-origin' is ignored when background-attachment is fixed.
Spec: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-backgrounds-3/#background-originFixes#6045.
Improves the Google SERPs.
We mark `html/rendering/replaced-elements/images/space.html` as failing.
This test tested whether `<img hspace>` and inline margins do the same
thing. Since this was trivially the case before (since we implemented
neither) and now is not, this test now fails.
This add some properties to the style system and a new flow type, but the larger issues of dealing with fragmentation in the flow tree is still an open question.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/5480)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Known issues:
* Collapsed borders do not correctly affect the border-box of the table
itself.
* The content widths of all cells in a column and the content height of
all cells in a row is the same in this patch, but not in Gecko and
WebKit.
* Corners are not painted well. The spec does not say what to do here.
* Column spans are not handled well. The spec does not say what to do
here either.
`FontContext::get_layout_font_group_for_style()`.
There are several optimizations here:
* We make font families atoms, to allow for quicker comparisons.
* We precalculate an FNV hash of the relevant fields of the font style
structure.
* When obtaining a platform font group, we first check pointer equality
for the font style. If there's no match, we go to the FNV hash. Only
if both caches miss do we construct and cache a font group. Note that
individual fonts are *also* cached; thus there are two layers of
caching here.
15% improvement in total layout thread time for Facebook Timeline.
Transition events are not yet supported, and the only animatable
properties are `top`, `right`, `bottom`, and `left`. However, all other
features of transitions are supported. There are no automated tests at
present because I'm not sure how best to test it, but three manual tests
are included.
`cellspacing` attribute per HTML5 § 14.3.9.
Table layout code has been refactored to push the spacing down to
rowgroups and rows; this will aid the implementation of
`border-collapse` as well.
This commit also fixes two nasty issues in table layout:
* In fixed layout, extra space would not be divided among columns that
had auto width but had nonzero minimum width.
* In automatic layout, extra space would be distributed to constrained
columns as well even if unconstrained columns with percentage equal to
zero were present.
§ 12.3-12.5.
Only simple alphabetic and numeric counter styles are supported. (This
is most of them though.)
Although this PR adds a sequential pass to layout, I verified that on
pages that contain a reasonable number of ordered lists (Reddit
`/r/rust`), the time spent in generated content resolution is dwarfed by
the time spent in the parallelizable parts of layout. So I don't expect
this to negatively affect our parallelism expect perhaps in pathological
cases.
