eca0acf459 uncovered a bug in the way that
the scrolling area of `window` was calculated and broke scrolling on the
root element. This change does two things in order to fix that:
1. Does a partial revert of eca0acf459 in
order to get scrolling from script working again on the window
object.
2. Has the compositor always generate a frame for scrolls starting from
script and waits for them. This is speculative fix for flakiness in
root scrolling tests on CI.
Before the code was only allowing `overflow: hidden` elements to scroll.
This fixes that issue and also clean up the code that deals with
detecting whether the body is a "potentially scrollable" in quirks mode.
Scrolling from script should flow layout and send a display list to
WebRender. This allows all of the scroll nodes to exist in WebRender
before asking it to move the node.
See https://gist.github.com/paulirish/5d52fb081b3570c81e3a.
Fixes#29659.
Use a stronger atomic guarantee when cancelling tasks
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
In the context of https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/22507
Note that the "other side" of these operations is at 0b61cfc3ae/components/script/task.rs (L102)
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [ ] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [ ] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #___ (GitHub issue number if applicable)
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Improve worker shutdown
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
FIX#26548FIX#25212
and also a step towards https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/26502
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [ ] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [ ] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #___ (GitHub issue number if applicable)
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Instead of having `ScriptThread` handle rooting nodes, do this in
`Animations`. This makes it easier to know when it is appropriate to
root and unroot nodes instead of relying on a certain order of events.
This also allows reducing quite a bit the amount of unsafe code.
This event is triggered when an animation iterates. This change also
moves iteration out of style calculation to an "update animations" which
is the next part of having animation event handling match the HTML spec.
This is preparation for sharing this code with layout_2020 and
implementing selective off-the-main-thread animations.
We still look for nodes not in the flow tree in the layout thread.
This is a small step toward fixing #19242. The main idea is that the
clock for animations should advance as the event loop ticks. We
accomplish this by moving the clock from layout and naming it the
"animation timeline" which is the spec language. This should fix
flakiness with animations and transitions tests where a reflow could
move animations forward while script was running.
This change also starts to break out transition and animation events
into their own data structure, because it's quite likely that the next
step in fixing #19242 is to no longer send these events through a
channel.
This change corrects synchronization issues with animations, by
reworking the animation processing model to do a quick restyle and
incremental layout when ticking animations.
While this change adds overhead to animation ticks, the idea is that
this will be the fallback when synchronous behavior is required to
fulfill specification requirements. In the optimistic case, many
animations could be updated and applied off-the-main-thread and then
resynchronized when style information is queried by script.
Fixes#13865.
This is triggered when an animation finishes. This is a high priority
because it allows us to start rooting nodes with animations in the
script thread.
This doesn't yet cause a lot of tests to pass because they rely on the
existence of `Document.getAnimations()` and the presence of
`animationstart` and animationiteration` events.
Implementing createImageBitmap
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Implementing createImageBitmap method for canvas image source.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix#20650 (GitHub issue number if applicable)
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Break the association between pipelines and browsing context actors.
Now there is one browsing context actor per actual browsing context,
and individual actors keep track of known pipelines as necessary.
There is also one console/performance/timeline/inspector/etc. actor
per browsing context.
This also centralizes more information in the browsing context actor.
Rather than duplicating state for the active pipeline in actors that
need to use it, each actor now remembers the name of its associated
browsing context actor and obtains that state whenever it's necessary.
webgl: Don't dirty canvas element while in immersive mode.
There are various WebGL APIs that are supposed to trigger a frame composite at the end of the event loop when they're used. We enforce this via dirtying the canvas element and ensuring that reflow occurs for normal content. This is redundant when we're using immersive mode and incurs extra work by the layout thread and compositor that inhibits the immersive rendering performance.
---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix (part of) #26019
- [x] These changes do not require tests because we do not have infrastructure to test immersive mode on CI.
Take origin from current window instead of creating a new one in event of reflow
Everytime a new `LayoutContext` was created, it created a new origin which
caused endless stream of image loads to occur in case of reflow. The reason
for this was that the existing image, although cached successfully, was not
used because the entry in hashmap did not match because of different(new)
origin.
This is solved by storing the origin of a window in enum `ScriptReflow` and
used in creating new `LayoutContext` in case of reflow.
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
r?@jdm
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#24720 (GitHub issue number if applicable)
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
