Layers were a feature of the legacy drawing path. If we re-add them at
some point, it probably makes more sense to make them a product of
display list inspection.
This change also remove a bunch of dead painting code.
fragments if `overflow` is not `visible` per CSS 2.1 § 10.8.1.
Additionally, this patch reverts the change introduced in #12642 in
favor of the spec-compliant behavior described above. This patch also
removes the `inline_block_overflow.html` reftest introduced in #3725, as
the behavior it expected contradicted CSS 2.1 (and in fact the test
fails in Gecko).
The changes that this patch makes to `input_selection_a.html` and
`input_selection_incremental_a.html` are necessary workarounds to make
the tests pass in light of the fact that Servo's UA stylesheet applies
`overflow: hidden` to `<input>` elements. I believe that the changes are
not necessary in other rendering engines because they hard-code
`overflow: hidden`-like behavior for `<input>` elements, while Servo
uses the actual CSS `overflow: hidden` behavior. As far as I can tell,
Servo's behavior is arguably more spec-compliant, but it remains to be
seen how Web compatible it is.
Improves the Google results pages.
Closes#13707.
10.8, and implement `vertical-align: middle` per CSS 2.1 § 10.8.1.
`InlineMetrics` has been split into `InlineMetrics` for fragments and
`LineMetrics` for lines. Both structures' fields have been renamed in
order to more clearly delineate the difference between *space* and
*content*. Vertical positioning of fragments has been reworked to take
margins and borders into account only for replaced content.
This patch fixes the `vertical_align_super_a.html` reftest. Servo now
matches the rendering that Gecko and WebKit produce.
Additionally, this includes a test for the popular inline-block
centering technique described here:
https://s.codepen.io/shshaw/fullpage/gEiDt?#Inline-Block
Support SVG element
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
minimal SVG element implementation
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#12974 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/13589)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Honor SERVO_ENABLE_DEBUG_ASSERTIONS on the build machines.
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
As part of #13127.
cc @aneeshusa
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/13387)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
It's not possible to implement a Ref::map equivalent method on AtomicRefCell
while having AtomicRefCell implemented on top of RwArc. We could potentially
reimplement AtomicRefCell to be more like RefCell and add a Ref::map equivalent
method, but I (and pcwalton) think we should try just cloning a few extra
Arcs at these callsites instead.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 6H8vAWguO3z
Otherwise we might mix writing modes. Not totally sure this change is correct in
the case we're mixing them, we might need to just not checking that operation.
Fixed layout flow tree JSON serialization
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
The second argument for the `emit_struct()` is the number of fields, if given `0`, the output JSON will always be empty.
This is used in `./mach run -d -Z trace-layout https://servo.org`, which will dump the layout flow tree into a `layout_trace.json` file for debugging.
This also unblocks https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/12675
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] These changes do not require tests because its a debugging tool, not critical for normal code path
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/12935)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Implement flexible box layout for row container
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
This pull requests implements basic flexible box layout for row container.
It has implemented most basic flexbox features, including grow, shrink, multi-line, *reverse properties, and alignment under `justify-content`, `align-items`, `align-self`, `align-content`.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
r? @pcwalton
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/12330)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Let textarea wrap lines
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
1. Change textarea's style from white-space: pre to white-space: pre-wrap.
2. Display insertion point when a line is wrapped.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#10053 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/12388)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
The 'box_sizing_boundary()' method return the border_padding width in
certain direction if fragment has property 'box-sizing: border-box'. The
'border_padding' field should be initialized before.
This was making us fall in a loop where the start split was empty, but we didn't
ignore it because the current fragment had this flag, but then we treated it
differently depending on the white_space property.
Not totally sure this is the proper fix, but it makes sense to me. In case it
is:
Fixes#12369.
The display list item for a line of text has a single color assigned for
it, so text fragments with different colors cannot be merged.
There is no issue number for this, as far as I know. I found this while
trying an internal program that uses red asterisks for required text
fields.
Fragment debug_id u16 only exists in debug, prod will format mem address
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Each fragment has a `u16` `debug_id` in debug mode, but no `debug_id` in production to save memory. To format a debug id in production, the address of the empty `debug_id` is displayed.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#87 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] These changes do not require tests because it looks like it's not possible to mock out `cfg` options in `#[test]`s
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/11442)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Do not create stacking contexts for text fragments
Without this change, each text fragment in a block that establishes a
stacking context will establish its own stacking context. This is
unnecessary and increases the amount of work done during display list
construction. This change should not change output, but should improve
performance.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/11035)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Without this change, each text fragment in a block that establishes a
stacking context will establish its own stacking context. This is
unnecessary and increases the amount of work done during display list
construction.
WebRender.
This happens asynchronously, just as it does in non-WebRender mode.
This functionality is a prerequisite for doing proper display-list-based
hit testing in WebRender, since it moves the scroll offsets into Servo
(and, specifically, into the script thread, enabling iframe event
forwarding) instead of keeping them private to WebRender.
Requires servo/webrender_traits#55 and servo/webrender#277.
Partially addresses #11108.
