In particular, `main_content_sizes()` now works with columns.
`layout_for_block_content_size()` is now used for both intrinsic sizes
and intrinsic contributions, a IntrinsicSizingMode parameter is added
to choose the behavior.
Also, we consider the main size of a flex item as indefinite if its flex
basis is indefinite and the flex container has an indefinite main size.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
This change removes restrictions on using the column layout mode of
flexbox and adds an initial implementation of sizing for that flex
direction. There's a lot of missing pieces still, but in some cases this
does render column flexbox.
In particular, there are now two code paths for preferred widths
(intrinsic size) calcuation: one in the main axis (row) and one in
the cross axis (column) corresponding to the flex direciton with
horizontal writing modes.
In addition, `FlexItemBox::inline_content_sizes` is removed in favor of
making `sizing::outer_inline` /
`IndependentFormattingContext::outer_inline_content_sizes` generic
enough to handle using a different value for auto minimum sizes, which
flexbox needs.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This change adds a version of row height distribution that follows the
distribtuion algorithm used for tables in Blink's LayoutNG. This is just
an intermediate step toward implementing a distribution algorithm for
both rows and columns more similar to Layout NG.
The CSS Table 3 specification is often wrong with regard to web
compatability, which is why we have abandoned it in favor of the Layout
NG algorithm for row height distribution. this work.
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* layout: Implement computation of table column widths
This change implements the various steps of table column width
computation, ignoring features that don't exist yet (such as separated
borders, column elements, and colgroups).
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* Fix an issue with the assignment of column percent width
* Respond to review comments
---------
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Typically, block-level contents are stacked vertically, so this was just
taking the maximum size among all contents. However, floats can be
stacked horizontally, so we need to sum their sizes.
… and converting them to flow-relative geometric values.
These values are almost always used to size and position a fragment within its containing block, so using the mode of the containing block seems more correct.
Note that the `writing-mode` and `direction` properties are disabled in Servo at the moment, so this PR by itself should have no effect: the writing mode of an element is always the same of that of its containing block since they’re both horizontal rtl.
