* Remove script_plugins
* Use crown instead of script_plugins
* crown_is_not_used
* Use crown in command base
* bootstrap crown
* tidy happy
* disable sccache
* Bring crown in tree
* Install crown from tree
* fix windows ci
* fix warning
* fix mac
libscript_plugins.dylib is not available anymore
* Update components/script/lib.rs
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
* Update for nightly-2023-03-18
Mostly just based off https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/30630
* Always install crown
it's slow only when there is new version
* Run crown test with `mach test-unit`
* Small fixups; better trace_in_no_trace tests
* Better doc
* crown in config.toml
* Fix tidy for real
* no sccache on rustc_wrapper
* document rustc overrides
* fixup of compiletest
* Make a few minor comment adjustments
* Fix a typo in python/servo/platform/base.py
Co-authored-by: Samson <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
* Proper test types
* Ignore tidy on crown/tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
I moved away from the `Window` struct all the logic to handle task
sources, into a new struct called `TaskManager`. In a happy world, I'd
be able to just have there two functions, of the types:
```rust
fn task_source<T: TaskSource>(&self, name: TaskSourceName) -> Box<T>
fn task_source_with_canceller<T: TaskSource>(&self, name: TaskSourceName)
-> (Box<T>, TaskSourceCanceller)
```
And not so much duplicated code. However, because TaskSource can't be a
trait object (because it has generic type parameters), that's not
possible. Instead, I decided to reduce duplicated logic through macros.
For reasons[1], I have to pass both the name of the function with
canceller and the name of the function without, as I'm not able to
concatenate them in the macro itself. I could probably use
`concat_idents` to create both types already defined and reduce the
amount of arguments by one, but that macro is nightly only. At the same
time, not being able to declare macros inside `impl` forces me to pass
`self` as an argument.
All this makes this solution more verbose than it would be ideally. It
does reduce duplication, but it doesn't reduce the size of the file.
[1](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29599)
http://www.robohornet.org gives a score of 101.36 on master,
and 102.68 with this PR. The latter is slightly better,
but probably within noise level.
So it looks like this PR does not affect DOM performance.
This is expected since `Box::new` is defined as:
```rust
impl<T> Box<T> {
#[inline(always)]
pub fn new(x: T) -> Box<T> {
box x
}
}
```
With inlining, it should compile to the same as box syntax.
In a later PR, DomRoot<T> will become a type alias of Root<Dom<T>>,
where Root<T> will be able to handle all the things that need to be
rooted that have a stable traceable address that doesn't move for the
whole lifetime of the root. Stay tuned.
