This should help out quite a bit with uBO, which has lots of very
general attribute selectors. We invalidate per attribute name rather
than using a SelectorMap, which prevents matching for attribute
selectors that can't have changed.
The idea is that this should be generally cheaper, though there are
cases where this would be a slight pesimization. For example, if there's
an attribute selector like:
my-specific-element[my-attribute] { /* ... */ }
And you change `my-attribute` in an element that isn't a
`my-specific-element`, before that the SelectorMap would've prevented us
from selector-matching completely. Now we'd still run selector-matching
for that (though the matching would be pretty cheap).
However I think this should speed up things generally, let's see what
the perf tests think before landing this though.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D76825
That way we can look at the parent dependency as described in the previous
patch. An alternative would be to add a:
parent_dependency: Option<&'a Dependency>
on construction to `Invalidation`, but this way seems slightly better to avoid
growing the struct. It's not even one more indirection because the selector is
contained directly in the Dependency struct.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D71422
The tricky part of :is() and :where() is that they can have combinators inside,
so something like this is valid:
foo:is(#bar > .baz) ~ taz
The current invalidation logic is based on the assumption that you can
represent a combinator as a (selector, offset) tuple, which are stored in the
Dependency struct. This assumption breaks with :is() and :where(), so we need
to make them be able to represent a combinator in an "inner" selector.
For this purpose, we add a `parent` dependency. With it, when invalidating
inside the `:is()` we can represent combinators inside as a stack.
The basic idea is that, for the example above, when an id of "bar" is added or
removed, we'd find a dependency like:
Dependency {
selector: #bar > .baz,
offset: 1, // pointing to the `>` combinator
parent: Some(Dependency {
selector: foo:is(#bar > .baz) > taz,
offset: 1, // Pointing to the `~` combinator.
parent: None,
})
}
That way, we'd start matching at the element that changed, towards the right,
and if we find an element that matches .baz, instead of invalidating that
element, we'd look at the parent dependency, then double-check that the whole
left-hand-side of the selector (foo:is(#bar > .baz)) actually changed, and then
keep invalidating to the right using the parent dependency as usual.
This patch only builds the data structure and keeps the code compiling, the
actual invalidation work will come in a following patch.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D71421
Some of the stuff, in particular inside GeckoBindings stuff should be
refactored to be less ugly and duplicate a bit less code, but the rest of the
code should be landable as is.
Some invalidation changes are already needed because we weren't matching with
the right shadow host during invalidation (which made existing ::part() tests
fail).
Pending invalidation work:
* Making exportparts work right on the snapshots.
* Invalidating parts from descendant hosts.
They're not very hard but I need to think how to best implement it:
* Maybe get rid of ShadowRoot::mParts and just walk DOM descendants in the
Shadow DOM.
* Maybe implement a ElementHasExportPartsAttr much like HasPartAttr and use
that to keep the list of elements.
* Maybe invalidate :host and ::part() together in here[1]
* Maybe something else.
Opinions?
[1]: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/131338e5017bc0283d86fb73844407b9a2155c98/servo/components/style/invalidation/element/invalidator.rs#561
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D53730
And do a full restyle only when the state goes from visited to unvisited or vice
versa. That is, use regular invalidation for addition or removals of href
attributes, for example.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D50821
Still does nothing, since we still do not collect part rules, but this is all
the plumbing that should allow us to invalidate parts when attributes or state
change on their ancestors.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32642
We match with AllLinksVisitedAndUnvisited for style invalidation, and we already
do a subtree restyle because :visited matching doesn't depend on the actual
element state.
So all this stuff is just not needed. The comment points to the attribute tests
in bug 1328509, but those still trivially pass with this change.
I think this was unneeded since I introduced AllLinksVisitedAndUnvisited, or
maybe since https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/19520. In any case it doesn't
really matter, and I already had done this cleanup in my WIP patches for
bug 1406622, but I guess this is a slightly more suitable place to land them :)
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D3305
We force a repaint from ContentStateChangedInternal if visited links are
disabled, and that's observable. Let's cut it off as early as we can to avoid
timing attacks even when :visited is disabled.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D3304
It used to be this way because of lifetime issues (plus the shadow
datas were in RwLocks at some point IIRC). Now we guarantee that as long as the
element is away the cascade data is as well, so we don't need to thread it
around.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2768
And general Element logging. We now print all the attributes for comparison.
If this turns out to be too verbose we can change it to diff them or something.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2471
Kinda tricky because :host only matches rules on the shadow root where the rules
come from. So we need to be careful during invalidation and style sharing.
I didn't use the non_ts_pseudo_class_list bits because as soon as we implement
the :host(..) bits we're going to need to special-case it anyway.
The general schema is the following:
* Rightmost featureless :host selectors are handled inserting them in the
host_rules hashmap. Note that we only insert featureless stuff there. We
could insert all of them and just filter during matching, but that's slightly
annoying.
* The other selectors, like non-featureless :host or what not, are added to the
normal cascade data. This is harmless, since the shadow host rules are never
matched against the host, so we know they'll just never match, and avoids
adding more special-cases.
* Featureless :host selectors to the left of a combinator are handled during
matching, in the special-case of next_element_for_combinator in selectors.
This prevents this from being more invasive, and keeps the usual fast path
slim, but it's a bit hard to match the spec and the implementation.
We could keep a copy of the SelectorIter instead in the matching context to
make the handling of featureless-ness explicit in match_non_ts_pseudo_class,
but we'd still need the special-case anyway, so I'm not fond of it.
* We take advantage of one thing that makes this sound. As you may have
noticed, if you had `root` element which is a ShadowRoot, and you matched
something like `div:host` against it, using a MatchingContext with
current_host == root, we'd incorrectly report a match. But this is impossible
due to the following constraints:
* Shadow root rules aren't matched against the host during styling (except
these featureless selectors).
* DOM APIs' current_host needs to be the _containing_ host, not the element
itself if you're a Shadow host.
Bug: 992245
Reviewed-by: xidorn
MozReview-Commit-ID: KayYNfTXb5h
It's just a struct aggregating stylesheets + CascadeData, with a quirks_mode
parameter because XBL sucks so bad.
Bug: 1436059
Reviewed-by: xidorn
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7q99tSNXo0K
This is a partial revert of
ce1d8cd232
If you're in a shadow tree, you may not be slotted but you still need to look at
the slotted rules, since a <slot> could be a descendant of yours.
Just use the same invalidation map everywhere, and remove complexity.
This means that we can do some extra work while trying to gather invalidation
if there are slotted rules, but I don't think it's a problem.
The test is ported from https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/fast/css/invalidation/slotted.html?l=1&rcl=58d68fdf783d7edde1c82a642e037464861f2787
Curiously, Blink fails the test as written, presumably because they don't flush
styles from getComputedStyle correctly (in their test they do via
updateStyleAndReturnAffectedElementCount), due to <slot>s not being in the flat
tree in their implementation.
Bug: 1429846
Reviewed-by: heycam
MozReview-Commit-ID: 6b7BQ6bGMgd
