It turns out that it's problematic to embed ThreadLocalStyleContext within
LayoutContext, because parameterizing the former on TElement (which we do
in the next patch) infects all the traversal stuff with the trait parameters,
which we don't really want.
In general, it probably makes sense to use separate scoped TLS types for
the separate DOM and Flow tree passes, so we can add a different ScopedTLS
type for the Flow pass if we ever need it.
We also reorder the |scope| and |shared| parameters in parallel.rs, because
it aligns more with the order in style/parallel.rs. I did this when I was
adding a TLS parameter to all these functions, which I realized we don't need
for now.
This allows us to get rid of a bunch of lifetimes and simplify a lot of code. It
also lets us get rid of that nasty lifetime transmute, which is awesome.
The situation with thread-local contexts is still suboptimal, but we fix that in
subsequent patches.
Introduce a PropertyId enum and use it instead of strings of property names
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
* `LonghandId` and `ShorthandId` are C-like enums
* `Atom` is used for the name of custom properties.
* `PropertyDeclarationId` is the identifier for `PropertyDeclaration`,
after parsing and shorthand expansion. (Longhand or custom property.)
* `PropertyId` represents any CSS property, e.g. in CSSOM.
(Longhand, shorthand, or custom.)
CC @upsuper
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14535)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
The primary idea of this patch is to ditch the rigid enum of Previous/Current
styles, and replace it with a series of indicators for the various types of
work that needs to be performed (expanding snapshots, rematching, recascading,
and damage processing). This loses us a little bit of sanity checking (since
the up-to-date-ness of our style is no longer baked into the type system), but
gives us a lot more flexibility that we'll need going forward (especially when
we separate matching from cascading). We also eliminate get_styling_mode in
favor of a method on the traversal.
This patch does a few other things as ridealongs:
* Temporarily eliminates the handling for transfering ownership of styles to the
frame. We'll need this again at some point, but for now it's causing too much
complexity for a half-implemented feature.
* Ditches TRestyleDamage, which is no longer necessary post-crate-merge, and is
a constant source of compilation failures from either needing to be imported
or being unnecessarily imported (which varies between gecko and servo).
* Expands Snapshots for the traversal root, which was missing before.
* Fixes up the skip_root stuff to avoid visiting the skipped root.
* Unifies parallel traversal and avoids spawning for a single work item.
* Adds an explicit pre_traverse step do any pre-processing and determine whether
we need to traverse at all.
MozReview-Commit-ID: IKhLAkAigXE
added dom obj counting to decide sequential/parallel layout (#10110)
This is a rebased version of #11713
---
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#10110 (github issue number if applicable).
- [X] There are no tests for these changes because it's an optimization with no visible behavioral changes
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/12862)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Reimplement scrolling to fragments
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#13736, #10753 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
This reimplemntation of the feature uses ScrollRootIds to scroll
particular scrollable areas of the page.
Fixes#13736.
Fixes#10753.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14367)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
layout: Fix some particularly bad cases of spurious reflows leading to script thread unresponsiveness.
See commits for details. This improves nytimes.com quite a bit.
r? @notriddle
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14418)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Use new DisplayListBuilder improvements in Servo
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [x] These changes do not require tests because they should not change behavior.
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
In particular, we no longer to have a WebRenderFrameBuilder. All of the
complication is now handled by the DisplayListBuilder itself.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14386)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
CSSOM: Make Stylesheet fields have their own synchronization
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
r? @upsuper
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix bug 1314208.
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14232)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Report panics using the top-level frame id rather than the pipeline id
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
At the moment, we report panics from script and layout using the root pipeline id. Once we are sharing more script threads, there won't be a root pipeline id any more. The plan is only to share script threads in the same tab, so there will be a top-level frame id that all the pipelines have in common. This PR reports panics using that top-level frame id.
This mostly makes a difference to the browser API: rather than targeting a `mozbrowsererror` event at the root iframe of the script thread that panicked, it targets it at the containing mozbrowser iframe.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes do not require tests because we don't test crash reporting
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14173)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Urlmageddon
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Still needs a bunch of code in net to be converted in order to get more
advantage of this for images and stuff, but meanwhile this should help quite a
bit with #13778.
Still wanted to get this in.
r? @SimonSapin
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14246)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
The style system never actually does anything with the document. This allows us
to remove a bunch of stubbing on the Gecko side and streamline some things on
the Servo side in future patches.
Don't promote all scrollable regions to stacking contexts
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Don't promote all scrollable regions to stacking contexts
Instead annotate all flows with their owning ScrollRoots. When
processing the display list items into a flattened display list, we add
PushScrollRoot and PopScrollRoot to signal when scrolling regions start
and end. It is possible for content from different scrolling regions to
intersect and when they do, the stack of scrolling regions is
duplicated. When these duplicated scrolling regions stacks reach
WebRender, it will scroll them in tandem.
The PushScrollRoot and PopScrollRoot items are currently represented as
StackingContexts in WebRender, but eventually these will be replaced
with special WebRender display items.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#13529 and #13298. (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14084)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Instead annotate all flows with their owning ScrollRoots. When
processing the display list items into a flattened display list, we add
PushScrollRoot and PopScrollRoot to signal when scrolling regions start
and end. It is possible for content from different scrolling regions to
intersect and when they do, the stack of scrolling regions is
duplicated. When these duplicated scrolling regions stacks reach
WebRender, it will scroll them in tandem.
The PushScrollRoot and PopScrollRoot items are currently represented as
StackingContexts in WebRender, but eventually these will be replaced
with special WebRender display items.
Fixes#13529.
Fixed#13298.
This patch introduces infrastructure for the rule tree, and constructs it.
We don't use it yet, nor have good heuristics for GC'ing it, but this should not
happen anymore once we store the rule node reference in the node.
I haven't messed up with memory orders because I want to do a try run with it,
then mess with them.
Take down the ApplicableDeclarationsCache, use the rule tree for doing the cascade.
Make `FlowRef` a newtype
This creates a sharp distinction between `Arc<Flow>`s, which may be
owned by anyone, and `FlowRef`s, which may only be owned by the
traversal code. By checking the reference count, we ensure that a `Flow`
cannot be pointed to by `Arc`s and `FlowRef`s simultaneously.
This is not a complete fix for #6503, though it is a necessary start
(enforcing the no-aliasing rule of `FlowRef::deref_mut` will require far
more work).
---
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#14014 (github issue number if applicable).
- [X] These changes do not require tests because the existing tests, plus the added assertions, should be sufficient
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14053)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
This creates a sharp distinction between `Arc<Flow>`s, which may be
owned by anyone, and `FlowRef`s, which may only be owned by the
traversal code. By checking the reference count, we ensure that a `Flow`
cannot be pointed to by `Arc`s and `FlowRef`s simultaneously.
This is not a complete fix for #6503, though it is a necessary start
(enforcing the no-aliasing rule of `FlowRef::deref_mut` will require far
more work).
Fixes#14014
layout/context: Wrap `image_cache_thread` in a `Mutex<>` as well
`SharedLayoutContext.image_cache_thread` didn't get the `Mutex<>`
treatment along with all the other channels in there, because
`ipc-channel::Sender` is presently inherently `Sync`. I believe this to
be an implementation accident though, that should be rectified in the
future -- not something users should actually rely on...
Note that sharing senders (be it `mpsc` or `ipc-channel`) in is probably
not a good idea anyway: just cloning them -- and letting them handle the
sharing internally -- should be both simpler and cheaper. But right now
that's how things are handled here; so let's go with the flow...
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14048)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
