This adds basic support for `getClientRects()` by sharing code with the
implementation of `getBoundingClientRect()`. In addition to sharing
code, it also shares all of the bugs. Primarily, scrolilng positions are
not taken into account when return boundary rectangles.
This brings the version of WebRender used in Servo up-to-date with Gecko
upstream. The big change here is that HiDPI is no longer handled via
WebRender. Instead this happens via a scale applied to the root layer in
the compositor. In addition to this change, various changes are made to
Servo to adapt to the new WebRender API.
Co-authored-by: Mukilan Thiyagarajan <mukilan@igalia.com>
The specification gives instructions for how these values should be
propagated. The other big changs here is that they aren't applied to the
`<body>`.
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This adds support for table rows, columns, rowgroups and colgroups.
There are few additions here:
1. The createion of fragments, which allows script queries and hit
testing to work properly. These fragments are empty as all cells are
still direct descendants of the table fragment.
2. Properly handling size information from tracks and track groups as
well as frustrating rules about reordering rowgroups.
3. Painting a background seemlessly across track groups and groups. This
is a thing that isn't done in legacy layout (nor WebKit)!
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* layout: Round getClientRect queries to pixels properly
Instead of just flooring all pixels in getClientRect queries, we should
round the rectangle.
* Fix scrollWidth/scrollHeight too, and tests
* Tests passing
* Test expectation for legacy layout
---------
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Refactor the scrolling and scrollable area calculation on the window
object, to make it better match the specification. This has some mild
changes to behavior, but in general things work the same as they did
before. This is mainly preparation for properly handling viewport
propagation of the `overflow` property but seems to fix a few issues as
well.
There is one new failure in Layout 2020 regarding `position: sticky`,
but this isn't a big deal because there is no support for `position:
sticky` in Layout 2020 yet.
Co-authored-by: Rakhi Sharma <atbrakhi@igalia.com>
This is a simple code organization change with no behavior change with
the idea of making Layout 2020 easier to understand by new folks to the
project. The idea is that we will have a cleaner separation between the
different parts of layout ie one directory for the fragment tree and one
(currently multiple) directory for the box tree.
