This patch:
* Makes LengthPercentageOrAuto generic, and removes a bunch of code fo
LengthPercentageOrNone, which was used only for servo and now can use the
normal MaxLength (with a cfg() guard for the ExtremumLength variant).
* Shrinks MaxLength / MozLength's repr(C) reperesentation by reducing enum
nesting. The shrinking is in preparation for using them from C++ too, though
that'd be a different bug.
* Moves NonNegative usage to the proper places so that stuff for them can be
derived.
I did this on top of bug 1523071 to prove both that it could be possible and
that stuff wasn't too messy. It got a bit messy, but just because of a bug I
had fixed in bindgen long time ago already, so this updates bindgen's patch
version to grab a fix instead of ugly workarounds :)
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D17762
Also for the intersection observer root margin, since it was easier to fix it
up and clean it up than not doing it.
This is the first big step to get rid of nscoord. It duplicates a bit of logic
in nsLayoutUtils since for now max/min-width/height are still represented with
nsStyleCoord, but I think I prefer to land this incrementally.
I didn't add helpers for the physical accessors of the style rect sides that
nsStyleSides has (top/bottom/left/right) since I think we generally should
encourage the logical versions, but let me know if you want me to do that.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D17739
But enable it in all tests because a lot of them rely on using it in the
style="" attribute for example, or in inline stylesheets, which will no longer
parse this (even in chrome documents), and we don't want to rewrite all the XUL
and XBL tests.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D18027
The only reason it was on style_traits is so that they could use it from some
other crates, but Servo eventually ends up getting the value from an integer, so
may as well pass it around and do that in the end of the process anyway.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D16557
Based on https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1348519#c6 and
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3201:
Currently grid-template-rows/columns interpolate “per computed value”, which
means that if the number of tracks differs, or any track changes to/from a
particular keyword value to any other value, or if a line name is added/removed
at any position, the entire track listing is interpolated as “discrete”.
But we "agree" with two more granular options:
1. Check interpolation type per track, rather than for the entire list, before
falling back to discrete. I.e. a length-percentage track can animate between
two values while an adjacent auto track flips discretely to min-content.
2. Allow discrete interpolation of line name changes independently of track
sizes.
Besides, for the repeat() function, it's complicated to support interpolation
between different repeat types (i.e. auto-fill, auto-fit) and different repeat
counts, so we always fall-back to discrete if the first parameter of repeat()
is different.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D16129
It does not represent `<length> | <percentage>`, but `<length-percentage>`, so
`LengthOrPercentage` is not the right name.
This patch is totally autogenerated using:
rg 'LengthOrPercentage' servo | cut -d : -f 1 | sort | uniq > files
for file in $(cat files); do sed -i "s#LengthOrPercentage#LengthPercentage#g" $file; done
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D15812
This is a first step to share LengthOrPercentage representation between Rust and
Gecko.
We need to preserve whether the value came from a calc() expression, for now at
least, since we do different things depending on whether we're calc or not right
now. See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3482 and dependent bugs for
example.
That means that the gecko conversion code needs to handle calc() in a bit of an
awkward way until I change it to not be needed (patches for that incoming in the
next few weeks I hope).
I need to add a hack to exclude other things from the PartialEq implementation
because the new conversion code is less lossy than the old one, and we relied on
the lousiness in AnimationValue comparison (in order to start transitions and
such, in [1] for example).
I expect to remove that manual PartialEq implementation as soon as I'm done with
the conversion.
The less lossy conversion does fix a few serialization bugs for animation values
though, like not loosing 0% values in calc() when interpolating lengths and
percentages, see the two modified tests:
* property-types.js
* test_animation_properties.html
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D15793
Replace LengthOrPercentage with NonNegativeLengthOrPercentage on
ShapeRadius, Circle, Ellipse. And derive ToAnimatedValue for ShapeSource and
its related types, so we clamp its interpolated results into non-negative
values. (i.e. The radius of circle()/ellipse() and the border-radius of
inset().)
Note: We may get negative values when using a negative easing function, so the
clamp is necessary to avoid the incorrect result or any undefined behavior.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D14654
We should let block-size/min-block-size/max-block-size accept keywords as the
initial value, just like width in vertical writing mode or height in horizontal
writing mode.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D14320
This ended up not being so small of a patch as I'd have thought, since it
propagated a bit. But most of it is mechanical. Interesting part is
NonNegativeNumberOrPercentage and the actual uses of the NonNegative stuff and
during parsing.
This looks like it'd fix a few correctness issues during interpolation for all
the types except for BorderRadius and co (which handled it manually).
I should write tests for those in a different patch.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D14673
Since it allows to animate display, which is not good.
This is a regression from:
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/6884ba750aa3
Actually I wonder if the logic shouldn't be the other way around, i.e., a
shorthand is animatable if all the longhands are, not if just one.
In any case this rolls back to the previous behavior, should we do that, it
should be another bug.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D14632
I'm pretty sure the FIXME I left in the outline-style code is a bug,
but I want to clean this up further and I didn't want to fix it without adding
a test.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D12859
