This property determines the background positioning area, that is the position of
the origin of an image specified using the 'background-image' CSS property.
'background-origin' is ignored when background-attachment is fixed.
Spec: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-backgrounds-3/#background-originFixes#6045.
`BaseFlow::position` is relative to the parent flow's margin box in the inline
direction. We need to use the parent's `position` as the container size when
translating it to physical coordinates, or we get incorrect results for
non-LTR content.
The basic idea is it's safe to output an image for reftest by testing:
- That the compositor doesn't have any animations active.
- That the compositor is not waiting on any outstanding paint messages to arrive.
- That the script tasks are "idle" and therefore won't cause reflow.
- This currently means page loaded, onload fired, reftest-wait not active, first reflow triggered.
- It could easily be expanded to handle pending timers etc.
- That the "epoch" that the layout tasks have last laid out after script went idle, is reflected by the compositor in all visible layers for that pipeline.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6031)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
The basic idea is it's safe to output an image for reftest by testing:
- That the compositor doesn't have any animations active.
- That the compositor is not waiting on any outstanding paint messages to arrive.
- That the script tasks are "idle" and therefore won't cause reflow.
- This currently means page loaded, onload fired, reftest-wait not active, first reflow triggered.
- It could easily be expanded to handle pending timers etc.
- That the "epoch" that the layout tasks have last laid out after script went idle, is reflected by the compositor in all visible layers for that pipeline.
absolutely-positioned elements.
This also implements a little bit of the infrastructure needed to
support for fragmentation via support for multiple positioned fragments
in one flow.
Improves Google.
This implements a simple load-tracking system and tracks stylesheet loads as an example of how it fits together. This is a simplified and rebased version of #3714; I do not believe that the main thrust of hsivonen's comments (related to tracking navigation in browsing contexts) affect this part of the work.
r? @Ms2ger
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/5804)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Table columns should be layed out according to the 'direction' property of the
table flow, regardless of the 'direction' property of any table-row,
table-rowgroup, etc. flows.
This fixes a number of the `direction-applies-to-*` tests in the CSS2.1 test
suite.
This also simplifies `propagate_column_inline_sizes_to_child` by separating
the code used for table cells from the code for non-cell flows.
r? @pcwalton
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/5997)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Table columns should be layed out according to the 'direction' property of the
table flow, regardless of the 'direction' property of any table-row,
table-rowgroup, etc. flows.
This fixes a number of the `direction-applies-to-*` tests in the CSS2.1 test
suite.
This also simplifies `propagate_column_inline_sizes_to_child` by separating
the code used for table cells from the code for non-cell flows.
r? @pcwalton
computing the intrinsic widths of the associated fragment.
Fixes sites that use spacer gifs for table layout, such as the comments
page on Hacker News.
Improves the Google SERPs.
We mark `html/rendering/replaced-elements/images/space.html` as failing.
This test tested whether `<img hspace>` and inline margins do the same
thing. Since this was trivially the case before (since we implemented
neither) and now is not, this test now fails.
Spec: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-device-adapt/
Currently, the actual viewport is used by the layout task as part of the reflow, and the compositor uses the zoom constraints. I'm not sure if anywhere else currently needs access to the constraints (i.e. there's no CSSOM as far as I can tell).
I did not implement sections 9 (viewport <META>) or 10 (handling 'auto' for 'zoom').
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/5361)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
