Reimplement AtomicRefCell with pure atomics
While reviewing @bzbarsky's patches in [1], I started typing out some lore about how mutable AtomicRefCell borrows are actually cheaper than immutable ones, so we should prefer them where possible. But then I decided that this was a really dumb state of affairs and that we should just fix AtomicRefCell instead, and implement a proper AtomicRef{,Mut}::map while we were at it. So here we are.
This PR adds a from-scratch implementation of AtomicRefCell that aims to be 100% sound, even in unrealistic overflow scenarios. We should probably get this on crates.io eventually, but I want to land it landed in-tree first.
With this implementation, each operation (borrow or release) is one atomic instruction, and all borrow/release pairs (mutable or immutable) take 12 ns on my machine, which is what I'd expect. This is a 50% improvement over the previous implementation in the immutable case.
There may be some places where we could get away with Ordering::Release instead of Ordering::AcqRel, but it didn't seem worth it to try to reason it out.
r? @Manishearth
CC @emilio @SimonSapin @heycam @upsuper
[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1298588
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14828)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Updating http_network_or_cache_fetch to better match the fetch API spec
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#14742
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14784)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Actually, I think most of the functions in DOMTraversalContext deserve a nice
comment, but that's probably fine as a followup, I want to land the require-docs
thing now.
