The flags stylo cares about reading and writing potentially at the same
time are disjoint, so there's no need for any strong memory ordering.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D141829
If the theme is dark but user prefers light pages, the background of the
tabpanel should arguably be light, since it can be seen across some
navigations.
Expose a -moz-content-prefers-color-scheme media query to chrome pages
so that our UI can correctly query it (and remove the unused -moz-proton
atom while at it).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D136437
The only remaining consumers are ::-moz-tree pseudo-elements (we used to
use ThinBoxedSlice for other data structures in the past).
Those are not particularly performance sensitive so I think just
double-boxing is fine. In the future, if we wanted to avoid the double
indirection, we could probably use the "thin" crate
(https://docs.rs/thin) or similar, which stores the length of the slice
along with the allocation, making the pointer thin in all
configurations, much like "ThinArc" does:
https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/1ce2eea39442190a71a1f8f650d098f286bf4a01/servo/components/servo_arc/lib.rs#891
In practice though, I don't think it's particularly worth it for this
specific case.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D134672
By modeling it as a separate layer that behaves somewhat specially.
See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6872.
The remaining revert-layer tests that we fail are because either we
don't implement a feature (like @property) or because it's used in
keyframes (where revert is a bit unspecified and we have existing
issues with it).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D133373
To do this, we always draw the native titlebar behind the toolbox, and
then make the toolbox adapt to it by using the titlebar radius. This
makes us preserve the shadow properly.
On Wayland we'd double-draw the shadow (see bug 1509931 comment 4) so
this fixes it by trimming it as well using border-radius.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D128681
This is based off work by smurfd. But this patch doesn't support buttons
both at the left and right, which simplifies a lot the implementation.
Also, clean-up the existing env variables while at it.
Co-authored-by: Nicklas Boman <smurfd@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D132073
We allow animating pseudo-elements like ::-moz-progress-bar (and we
treat them like regular elements).
Ideally we should store animations for these in the parent element as
well, so they survive reframes and such. But treating them as regular
elements right now means that we do animate them, but we never update
animations for them correctly because wrapper.rs assumed them to be
non-animatable.
Since it seems reasonable to keep allowing the animations to happen,
let's just correct the update code and add a test.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D131794
This causes (among other things) pages to be dark when using regular
windows system colors and forcing colors to "always", which is nice.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D131165
Behind a pref for now. Given these selectors do nothing on non-chrome
documents (they just don't match) it seems worth trying.
A cursory search seems to indicate they're not used for UA detection or
something like that (or at least I haven't found such an usage).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D130736
Use the same document state mechanism we have for :moz-locale-dir. Also,
simplify the setup of the later to be the same as :dir(), allowing the
matching code to be less repetitive.
This should fix some flakiness in chrome mochitests, but we have no existing
tests for these pseudo-classes more generally and since they're just
chrome-only I'm not super-excited about adding more.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D130735
This I noticed while working on the following patches. Shouldn't have
any behavior change: the behavior does in fact match the element state
flag semantics correctly if we do this. We did split the dir flags into
two element bits a while ago.
:not(:dir()) still behaves correctly of course, and we have tests for that.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D130734
To more properly support Linux having a different default at runtime.
Expose the resolved value in appinfo for convenience, and use it in the
front-end as needed.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D129004
We always use alpha visual for WebRender, and appearance: none is
unnecessary (root element has no intrinsic appearance).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D128682
This bit is taken straight from D73454 (I reviewed it but I guess
another pair of eyes is ok, it's really straight-forward).
Co-authored-by: Nicklas Boman <smurfd@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D128679
We make it work on macOS by setting pointer-events: none + opacity: 0 rather
than visibility: hidden, and tweaking the caching setup to be Android-like.
Now that the scrollbars sheet is the same across platforms, move it to where
the rest of the UA sheets are. This way we guarantee that the RDM vs. Android
difference is less (just the ifdef at the top of the sheet).
Depends on D128084
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D128085
The specifics of how this is going to work are still getting spec'd /
discussed in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6576, but this
allows DevTools to work fine and the feature to be complete enough for
Nightly experimentation (with the other in-flight patches).
Otherwise devtools crashes when trying to inspect pages that use them.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D124656
See the discussion here: https://twitter.com/Rich_Harris/status/1433153204678799365
This should make attribute selectors roughly as fast as class selectors.
I think it's worth trying and see if perf bots complain on
micro-benchmarks and stylebench and such.
I made attributes more specific than local names, but less specific than
classes, which I think makes sense. When doing something like
foo[data-bar], filtering by data-bar seems likely to yield less elements
than filtering by foo.
While at it, remove the bloom filter pref since we shipped it in
bug 1704551 for 87 and we haven't heard complaints.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D124383
Instead, fix up the various content data structures when the stylesheet
is mutated. This makes reading a stylesheet not disable style sharing.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D115203
It's very hot when matching some kind of selectors like the ones in bug
1717267, and the two function calls show up in the profiles.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D119505
This will allow detecting the system theme, which allows fixing some of
the blocked bugs.
Note that when using the system theme we will still match light or dark
appropriately, so this shouldn't change behavior just yet.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D113516
This adds a new @media query -moz-toolbar-prefers-color-scheme which works like
prefers-color-scheme but is set based on the browser theme rather than the OS
theme. The background colour of the toolbar is used to determine the theme
dark/light preference. This will be used for in-content common.css pages and
other UI elements that include that stylesheet in the browser-chrome through
shadow DOM.
The end result is that about: pages, infobars, and modals will now "match" the
browser theme (just light/dark mode, not LWT theming support).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D111486
Safari does this. This reduces the runtime in the example linked from
comment 0 quite a lot (40ms on a local opt build, from ~130ms on a
release nightly build).
I added a pref because there's a slight chance of performance
regressions on pages that do not use attribute selectors, as we're now
doing more unconditional work per element (adding the attributes to the
bloom filter). But the trade-off should be worth it, I think.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D111689
