We match with AllLinksVisitedAndUnvisited for style invalidation, and we already
do a subtree restyle because :visited matching doesn't depend on the actual
element state.
So all this stuff is just not needed. The comment points to the attribute tests
in bug 1328509, but those still trivially pass with this change.
I think this was unneeded since I introduced AllLinksVisitedAndUnvisited, or
maybe since https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/19520. In any case it doesn't
really matter, and I already had done this cleanup in my WIP patches for
bug 1406622, but I guess this is a slightly more suitable place to land them :)
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D3305
We force a repaint from ContentStateChangedInternal if visited links are
disabled, and that's observable. Let's cut it off as early as we can to avoid
timing attacks even when :visited is disabled.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D3304
It used to be this way because of lifetime issues (plus the shadow
datas were in RwLocks at some point IIRC). Now we guarantee that as long as the
element is away the cascade data is as well, so we don't need to thread it
around.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2768
And general Element logging. We now print all the attributes for comparison.
If this turns out to be too verbose we can change it to diff them or something.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2471
This fixes a couple fuzz bugs and prevents special-casing <svg:use> even more in
bug 1431255.
Unfortunately not as many hacks went away as I'd have hoped, since we still need
to match document rules, see the linked SVGWG issues.
But blocks_ancestor_combinators goes away, which is nice since it's on a very
hot path.
Bug: 1450250
Reviewed-by: heycam
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D2154
MozReview-Commit-ID: C4mthjoSNFh
We could invalidate in a slightly more fine-grained way, but I don't think it's
worth the churn vs. keeping the special-cases minimal.
Bug: 1452640
Reviewed-by: xidorn
MozReview-Commit-ID: 5DkQrgwg9GW
Kinda tricky because :host only matches rules on the shadow root where the rules
come from. So we need to be careful during invalidation and style sharing.
I didn't use the non_ts_pseudo_class_list bits because as soon as we implement
the :host(..) bits we're going to need to special-case it anyway.
The general schema is the following:
* Rightmost featureless :host selectors are handled inserting them in the
host_rules hashmap. Note that we only insert featureless stuff there. We
could insert all of them and just filter during matching, but that's slightly
annoying.
* The other selectors, like non-featureless :host or what not, are added to the
normal cascade data. This is harmless, since the shadow host rules are never
matched against the host, so we know they'll just never match, and avoids
adding more special-cases.
* Featureless :host selectors to the left of a combinator are handled during
matching, in the special-case of next_element_for_combinator in selectors.
This prevents this from being more invasive, and keeps the usual fast path
slim, but it's a bit hard to match the spec and the implementation.
We could keep a copy of the SelectorIter instead in the matching context to
make the handling of featureless-ness explicit in match_non_ts_pseudo_class,
but we'd still need the special-case anyway, so I'm not fond of it.
* We take advantage of one thing that makes this sound. As you may have
noticed, if you had `root` element which is a ShadowRoot, and you matched
something like `div:host` against it, using a MatchingContext with
current_host == root, we'd incorrectly report a match. But this is impossible
due to the following constraints:
* Shadow root rules aren't matched against the host during styling (except
these featureless selectors).
* DOM APIs' current_host needs to be the _containing_ host, not the element
itself if you're a Shadow host.
Bug: 992245
Reviewed-by: xidorn
MozReview-Commit-ID: KayYNfTXb5h
It's just a struct aggregating stylesheets + CascadeData, with a quirks_mode
parameter because XBL sucks so bad.
Bug: 1436059
Reviewed-by: xidorn
MozReview-Commit-ID: 7q99tSNXo0K
Otherwise removal of stylesheets may get out of sync with other DOM changes, and
we may fail to invalidate the style of the affected elements.
Bug: 1432850
Reviewed-by: bz
MozReview-Commit-ID: DrMTgLzQcnk
This is a partial revert of
ce1d8cd232
If you're in a shadow tree, you may not be slotted but you still need to look at
the slotted rules, since a <slot> could be a descendant of yours.
Just use the same invalidation map everywhere, and remove complexity.
This means that we can do some extra work while trying to gather invalidation
if there are slotted rules, but I don't think it's a problem.
The test is ported from https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/fast/css/invalidation/slotted.html?l=1&rcl=58d68fdf783d7edde1c82a642e037464861f2787
Curiously, Blink fails the test as written, presumably because they don't flush
styles from getComputedStyle correctly (in their test they do via
updateStyleAndReturnAffectedElementCount), due to <slot>s not being in the flat
tree in their implementation.
Bug: 1429846
Reviewed-by: heycam
MozReview-Commit-ID: 6b7BQ6bGMgd
