Fix the size and position of overflow:scroll clip
The clip for overflow:scroll clip was not including the space for
padding, which could lead to some content being clipped when it
shouldn't. This changes fixes that issue.
A test is skipped because this fix also stops hiding a failure due to
mispositioned text.
Fixes#16576.
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#16576 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/17712)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
layout: Stop in-order traversal on children of InlineFlow
No need to do in-order traversal for children of InlineFlow, since
they are either inline-block or absolutely positioned elements, which
are guaranteed to be block formatting context.
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [X] These changes do not require tests because cleanup
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/17690)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
No need to do in-order traversal for children of InlineFlow, since
they are either inline-block or absolutely positioned elements, which
are guaranteed to be block formatting context.
The clip for overflow:scroll clip was not including the space for
padding, which could lead to some content being clipped when it
shouldn't. This changes fixes that issue.
A test is skipped because this fix also stops hiding a failure due to
mispositioned text.
Fixes#16576.
This reverts commit ebfc8f5858, reversing
changes made to 5585ff2c44.
Animation code can reenter and create a new TLS context from the traversal
SequentialTask, so this won't work as written.
layout: Clean up inline_metrics_of_block a little.
Previously the variable names were a little confusing (ascent was used
for the space_above_baseline in one branch and the and ascent field in
another branch, and was not really the ascent in one). Also add a
small diagram.
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [X] These changes do not require tests because they just refactor existing code
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/17556)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Previously the variable names were a little confusing (ascent was used
for the space_above_baseline in one branch and the and ascent field in
another branch, and was not really the ascent in one). Also add a
small diagram.
Fix incremental layout bugs for absolute and cleared elements
Fixes#17307. <del>There were two underlying bugs:</del>
* <del>Nodes were not marked dirty when their style attribute changed.</del>
* BaseFlow flags set during flow construction could get out of sync with the element's style if repair_style was called.
---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#17307
- [x] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/17581)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Make background gradient cover padding
CSS-gradients should not only cover the content of an
element but also the padding (but not the border).
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Thanks to @atouchet for catching this.
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#17387 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] These changes do not require tests because gradients are hard to test automatically but you can use [this gist](https://gist.github.com/pyfisch/fa263c8dfc57e5812fe8a4869ad61513) as a manual test.
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/17395)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Parallel layout optimizations
This takes some of the optimizations made to parallel styling in #16971 and applies them to parallel layout. Specifically:
* Reduce the chunk size, to increase chances for parallelism on trees with small fan-out.
* Reduce allocations by using SmallVec.
* Reduce task switching by processing up to one chunk of children within the same rayon task as the parent.
This cuts the "Primary Layout Pass" time in **half** on the MySpace page from [tp5n], and on my other real-world test pages it is a small improvement or close to no change.
[tp5n]: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Buildbot/Talos/Tests#tp5n_pages_set
---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes do not require tests because they affect performance only
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/17192)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
stylo: Bug 1335998 - Handle interpolation and accumulation of mismatched transform lists
These are the interdependent patches of Bug 1335998. We want to do interpolation and accumulation for mismatched transform lists, so introduce ComputedOperation::InterpolateMatrix and ComputedOperation::Accumulation. Both arms store the from_list and to_list, and resolve them until we have the layout information. For the Servo part, we haven't implemented how to read the transform lists in layout/fragment.rs, but I think it would be easy. (related issue #13267)
---
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix [Bug 1335998](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1335998)
- [X] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/17202)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
If we set the composite operation to accumulate, we may need to accumulate two
mismatched transform lists, and then to interpolate them. In order to
accumulate two mismatched transform lists, we also need the reference
box information, so use the same idea as that for interpolation. i.e.
use AccmulateMatrix to store it temporarily, and convert it into matrix
later.
