* script: Do not run layout in a thread
Instead of spawning a thread for layout that almost always runs
synchronously with script, simply run layout in the script thread.
This is a resurrection of #28708, taking just the bits that remove the
layout thread. It's a complex change and thus is just a first step
toward cleaning up the interface between script and layout. Messages are
still passed from script to layout via a `process()` method and script
proxies some messages to layout from other threads as well.
Big changes:
1. Layout is created in the script thread on Document load, thus every
live document is guaranteed to have a layout. This isn't completely
hidden in the interface, but we can safely `unwrap()` on a Document's
layout.
2. Layout configuration is abstracted away into a LayoutConfig struct
and the LayoutFactory is a struct passed around by the Constellation.
This is to avoid having to monomorphize the entire script thread
for each layout.
3. Instead of having the Constellation block on the layout thread to
figure out the current epoch and whether there are pending web fonts
loading, updates are sent synchronously to the Constellation when
rendering to a screenshot. This practically only used by the WPT.
A couple tests start to fail, which is probably inevitable since removing
the layout thread has introduced timing changes in "exit after load" and
screenshot behavior.
Co-authored-by: Josh Matthews <josh@joshmatthews.net>
* Update test expectations
* Fix some issues found during review
* Clarify some comments
* Address review comments
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Matthews <josh@joshmatthews.net>
* Add initial support for sticky positioning for non-legacy layout
Many tests still fail for a variety of reasons. One of the primary ones
is that CSSOM currently does not return correct values for elements
positioned by sticky nodes. This requires changes to WebRender to work
properly.
* Fix an assertion failure in the legacy layout sticky code
This is the start of the organization of types that are in their own
crates in order to break dependency cycles between other crates. The
idea here is that putting these packages into their own directory is the
first step toward cleaning them up. They have grown organically and it
is difficult to explain to new folks where to put new shared types. Many
of these crates contain more than traits or don't contain traits at all.
Notably, `script_traits` isn't touched because it is vendored from
Gecko. Eventually this will move to `third_party`.
2023-11-03 15:38:18 +00:00
Renamed from components/script_layout_interface/message.rs (Browse further)
